本文選題：審前會(huì)議 + 審前審查�。� 參考：《廣西民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從“審前會(huì)議制度”在《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》(以下簡稱“新法”)中得到確立。其就成為了學(xué)術(shù)界討論的熱點(diǎn)話題,因?yàn)槠湓谖覈痉w制中具有開創(chuàng)性的價(jià)值。通過《最高人民法院關(guān)于執(zhí)行《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》若干問題的解釋》(以下簡稱最高法司法解釋)對(duì)“審前會(huì)議制度”的闡述,說明其既具有實(shí)體性審查的作用也具有程序性審查的意義。在這一制度建立之前,法院不介入審前程序,也沒有控、辯、審三方參與的刑事訴訟構(gòu)造,這就導(dǎo)致了行政化特別明顯。及其不利于辯護(hù)權(quán)的行使,尤其是對(duì)非法證據(jù)的排除,這些都被迫推遲到法院的開庭審理之中。經(jīng)過這一次的改革,辯護(hù)人的辯護(hù)意見就可以在庭審前提出。這種訴訟化渠道的拓寬,更好的保障了人權(quán),是審判的一大進(jìn)步。但是對(duì)于審前會(huì)議的具體流程,我國的立法之中還無涉及。本文從審前會(huì)議制度出發(fā),采取比較研究的方法,在對(duì)與之相類似的英美法系預(yù)審程序、德國中間程序等研究的基礎(chǔ)上,以新刑事訴訟法內(nèi)容和最高法司法解釋為依據(jù),著重探討審前會(huì)議制度的具體內(nèi)容,制度價(jià)值、科學(xué)體系構(gòu)建等方面,以完善審前會(huì)議制度,使其與既有的審前審查程序相互配合,力求建立起符合國情的預(yù)審程序,使刑事司法更進(jìn)一步。
[Abstract]:The system of pretrial meeting has been established in the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the New Law). It has become a hot topic in academic circles because of its pioneering value in China's judicial system. Through the interpretation of several issues concerning the implementation of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court (hereinafter referred to as the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Law), It shows that it not only has the function of substantive examination but also has the significance of procedural review. Before the establishment of this system, the court did not intervene in the pretrial procedure, nor did it have the criminal procedure structure in which the three parties participated in the prosecution, defense and trial. It is not conducive to the exercise of the right to defence, especially the exclusion of illegal evidence, which has to be postponed to the court session. With this reform, the defender's defence can be presented before the trial. This widening of litigation channels, better protection of human rights, is a major progress of the trial. However, the specific process of the pretrial meeting, our legislation has not been involved. Starting from the system of pretrial meeting, this paper adopts the method of comparative study, on the basis of the research of the similar preliminary procedure in common law system and the intermediate procedure in Germany, based on the content of the new criminal procedure law and the judicial interpretation of the supreme law. Focusing on the specific content, system value and scientific system construction of the pretrial conference system, in order to perfect the pretrial conference system, make it cooperate with the existing pretrial review procedure, and strive to establish a pre-trial procedure in accordance with the national conditions, To further the administration of criminal justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪建成;;刑事審判程序的重大變革及其展開[J];法學(xué)家;2012年03期

2 張建偉;;紙面上的法與行動(dòng)中的法——排除非法證據(jù)規(guī)定引發(fā)的一點(diǎn)思考[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年05期

3 潘金貴;;英國刑事預(yù)審程序及其借鑒意義[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2008年05期

4 潘金貴;;美國刑事預(yù)審程序考察與評(píng)價(jià)[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2007年12期

5 閔春雷;;刑事庭前程序研究[J];中外法學(xué);2007年02期

6 ;刑事審判程序改革若干問題實(shí)證研究[J];法律適用;2007年02期

7 潘金貴;法國刑事預(yù)審程序考察與評(píng)價(jià)[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年01期

8 謝佑平,鄧立軍;預(yù)審法官制度比較研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

9 唐磊;效率與效益:刑事庭前準(zhǔn)備程序的法理分析[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

10 汪建成,楊雄;比較法視野下的刑事庭前審查程序之改造[J];中國刑事法雜志;2002年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2022132