本文選題：政府信息公開 + 知情權(quán)�。� 參考：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在社會政治文明高速發(fā)展的今天,法治作為一種順應(yīng)時代發(fā)展的治國理政重要方式也越來越得到重視。政府信息公開就是在改變政府職能,推動政府法治化建設(shè)這個大環(huán)境下產(chǎn)生的。保證政府依法公開信息有利于保障公民知情權(quán)的落實,而公民知情權(quán)的有效保障也能有效推動政府的依法行政。但不容忽視的是,我國這項制度的法律基礎(chǔ)較為薄弱及政府部門公開信息的意識不強都導致了公開政府信息的目的即對公民知情權(quán)的保障難以實現(xiàn),此時對于知情權(quán)的救濟也就尤為重要和必不可少了。政府信息公開的行政訴訟制度作為對公民知情權(quán)的救濟已經(jīng)在很多國家發(fā)展到一個較為完善的階段。而我國在這方面的法律制度建設(shè)起步較晚,各項規(guī)定也不太成熟,在實踐過程中還存在很多問題,也致使公民在維護自己知情權(quán)時面對很多困難。本文在立足我國政府信息公開各項訴訟制度與實踐的基礎(chǔ)上進行研究,針對在訴訟過程中出現(xiàn)的較為突出的問題,深入分析各項問題并試圖找到解決這些問題的對策。首先是對于政府信息公開訴訟的一般理論進行介紹,簡要概述有關(guān)的基本概念和重要特征,同時探討其所涉及的法理依據(jù)和法律價值,引申出對這一法律問題研究的重要意義,為下文相關(guān)問題的展開奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。其次,通過對典型案例進行介紹分析,簡要梳理出目前我國政府信息公開訴訟在發(fā)展過程中取得的成就以及存在的不足,為引出下文具體問題的分析奠定基礎(chǔ)。首要的就是受案范圍的界定問題,對于哪些案件應(yīng)該受理,哪些不屬于受案范圍實踐中還存在很多爭議,對這一問題的準確界定對于政府信息公開訴訟目的的實現(xiàn)至關(guān)重要。實踐中還存在的一個較為突出的問題就是關(guān)于例外信息的認定問題,在法院審理過程中由于例外信息的認定不明確會使法官無法判定案件所涉及的信息是否屬于不予公開的范圍。與受案范圍密切相關(guān)的是關(guān)于訴訟中原告與被告的資格認定問題,準確界定當事人資格能有效保護公眾的權(quán)益也能有效監(jiān)督行政行為;在對受案范圍與原被告資格的界定問題進行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,進一步探究我國信息公開訴訟中存在的原被告雙方的舉證責任分配問題。最后,就實踐中出現(xiàn)的突出問題結(jié)合我國的實際情況提出改善的建議,以此保證建立起更加健全的政府信息公開的行政訴訟法律制度。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social political civilization, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law as an important way of governing the country in accordance with the development of the times. The publicity of government information is produced under the environment of changing government functions and promoting the construction of government by law. Ensuring the government to disclose information according to law is conducive to the implementation of citizens' right to know, and the effective guarantee of citizens' right to know can also effectively promote the administration of government according to law. However, it can not be ignored that the weak legal basis of this system and the weak awareness of the public information of the government departments lead to the difficulty of realizing the purpose of the disclosure of government information, that is, the protection of citizens' right to know. At this time for the right to know the relief is particularly important and essential. As a relief to citizens' right to know, the administrative litigation system of government information disclosure has developed to a relatively perfect stage in many countries. However, the construction of legal system in this aspect of our country started late, the provisions are not very mature, there are still many problems in the process of practice, which makes citizens face a lot of difficulties in safeguarding their right to know. Based on the litigation system and practice of government information disclosure in our country, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the various problems and tries to find the countermeasures to solve these problems in view of the outstanding problems in the process of litigation. First of all, it introduces the general theory of public government information litigation, briefly summarizes the basic concepts and important characteristics, discusses the legal basis and legal value involved, and extends the significance of the research on this legal issue. To lay a theoretical foundation for the following related issues. Secondly, through the introduction and analysis of typical cases, this paper briefly combs out the achievements and shortcomings in the development process of the government information publicity litigation in our country at present, which lays a foundation for the analysis of the following specific problems. The first is to define the scope of the case, which cases should be accepted, which is not part of the scope of the case in practice there are many disputes, the accurate definition of this issue for the realization of the goal of public government information litigation is very important. One of the more prominent problems in practice is the identification of exceptional information. In the course of the court hearing, the judge can not judge whether the information involved in the case belongs to the scope of not public because of the uncertainty of the identification of the exceptional information. Closely related to the scope of the case is the qualification of the plaintiff and the defendant in the litigation, the accurate definition of the qualification of the parties can effectively protect the rights and interests of the public, and can effectively supervise administrative actions; Based on the analysis of the definition of the scope of the case and the qualification of the original defendant, this paper further explores the distribution of burden of proof between the original defendant and the original defendant in the information disclosure litigation in China. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the outstanding problems in practice combined with the actual situation of our country, so as to ensure the establishment of a more sound legal system of administrative litigation of government information disclosure.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鐘翠霞;;政府信息公開行政訴訟原告資格研究[J];湖北第二師范學院學報;2014年07期

2 張弛;;我國政府信息公開訴訟原告資格問題研究[J];法制與社會;2014年16期

3 王華麗;;關(guān)于政府信息公開行政訴訟的突出問題及對策建議[J];法制與社會;2014年05期

4 柏寒;;試論我國行政訴訟受案范圍的局限和改進建議[J];法制與社會;2013年34期

5 王盈;;政府信息公開行政訴訟問題探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2013年04期

6 王敬波;;政府信息概念及其界定[J];中國行政管理;2012年08期

7 譚博愛;;淺談?wù)畔⒐_訴訟的完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年07期

8 胡衛(wèi)列;;論行政公益訴訟制度的建構(gòu)[J];行政法學研究;2012年02期

9 史艷麗;;行政訴訟原告資格制度之評析與重構(gòu)[J];廣東社會科學;2012年03期

10 裴婷婷;;論政府信息公開行政訴訟的基本原則[J];科學經(jīng)濟社會;2012年01期

，

本文編號：2017682