本文選題：民事訴訟 + 行為保全��； 參考：《南昌大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文章是立足于2013年《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》中對行為保全的首次創(chuàng)立，研究分析此制度需要進一步完善的地方，并提出自己的建議設想。保全制度的完善是法治國家建立的重要象征，也是我國法治完善的趨勢，在我國行為保全的概念最初是由江偉和肖建國教授帶頭提出來的，首次發(fā)表在《民事訴訟中的行為保全初探》一文中。隨著我國經(jīng)濟的飛速發(fā)展，對我國保全制度的完善提出了更高的要求，值此2013年《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》中首次確立行為保全制度，所以在這個時候對我國行為保全制度具體內(nèi)容研究顯示特別的重要。 本文在第一章主要介紹行為保全的概念及相關的解釋，明確行為保全制度的概念，然后講述行為保全制度的發(fā)展歷程。在第二章主要從法理上分析行為保全制度的理論基礎。第三章主要立足新民訴法分析立法上存在的問題和實務中存在的問題。第四章主要針對問題提出完善的建議。同時在對比分析在國外不同國家和地區(qū)行為保全制度的基礎上，，結合我國的實際國情研究分析得出對行為保全制度的完善。理論上在我國財產(chǎn)保全制度已有比較的成熟規(guī)定。在此我個人建議為凸顯行為保全其存在的價值和迎合對實踐的需要，應當在立法上逐步的完善行為保全制度的具體規(guī)范，使其更加的完備。
[Abstract]:This article is based on the first establishment of the act preservation in the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2013. This paper studies and analyzes the areas where the system needs to be further improved, and puts forward its own suggestions and assumptions. The perfection of preservation system is not only an important symbol of the establishment of a country ruled by law, but also a trend of perfection of the rule of law in our country. In our country, the concept of preservation of conduct was first put forward by Jiang Wei and Professor Xiao Jianguo. For the first time, it was published in the article "the Preservation of acts in Civil Action". With the rapid development of China's economy, a higher requirement is put forward for the perfection of our country's preservation system. On the occasion of the first establishment of the act preservation system in the "Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China" in 2013, So at this time, it is particularly important to study the concrete content of the act preservation system in our country. In the first chapter, this paper mainly introduces the concept of act preservation and its related explanation, and clarifies the concept of act preservation system. Then the course of development of act preservation system is described. The second chapter mainly analyzes the theoretical basis of act preservation system from the legal theory. The third chapter analyzes the problems in legislation and practice based on New Civil procedure Law. The fourth chapter mainly aims at the question puts forward the consummation proposal. At the same time, on the basis of comparative analysis of the behavior preservation system in different countries and regions abroad, combining with the actual situation of our country, the author concludes the perfection of the act preservation system. In theory, the property preservation system in China has been relatively mature provisions. Here I personally suggest that in order to highlight the value of behavior preservation and meet the needs of practice, we should gradually improve the specific norms of the act preservation system in legislation to make it more complete.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳瑩;;我國行為保全制度的建構[J];廈門大學法律評論;2006年01期

2 陳嫻靈;;關于民事訴訟行為保全若干問題的法律思考[J];東岳論叢;2005年05期

3 張淑雋;劉園園;;論行為保全 兼談我國民訴法設立行為保全制度的必要性[J];法律適用;2006年10期

4 張衛(wèi)平;;《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》修改之我見[J];法商研究;2006年06期

5 范躍如;;試論我國行為保全制度及其構建與完善[J];法學家;2004年05期

6 陳小煒;施曉楠;;論行為保全制度的內(nèi)涵界定和價值考量[J];改革與開放;2010年09期

7 蔣吉才,危紅;論我國民事訴訟行為保全制度的建構[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年02期

8 陳琿;曹敏;;民事訴訟行為保全基本問題探究[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2010年06期

9 朱曉邈;Q饔

本文編號：2004513