本文選題：專利 + 確認不侵權之訴　； 參考：《廣東財經大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國，專利權人濫用權力的情況時有發(fā)生，權利人向其競爭者發(fā)出警告信，對他人進行侵權指控并威脅起訴，但在相當長的期間內都不向法院起訴，不僅給權力相對人造成損失，還給市場競爭造成不良影響。在知識經濟的今天，為保證知識產權都可以順利地轉化為資本，促進知識經濟的良好運作，嚴格規(guī)制專利權人濫用權力無疑是大勢所趨。專利確認不侵權之訴是最早在我國實踐領域出現的知識產權確認不侵權之訴的子訴，具有督促專利權人積極依法使用專利權的功能，可惜此類訴訟在理論和實踐上都存在不少問題需要厘清，其法理性質、當事人資格、受理條件、管轄范圍以及審判等問題等等一系列理論和實踐方面的具體問題并未明確。這類案件在法律法規(guī)中還找不到對應的規(guī)定，其受理條件等問題的規(guī)定還保留在最高院的司法解釋層次。本文從研究專利確認不侵權之訴的理論入手，再分析我國專利確認不侵權之訴的實施情況，并有針對性的考察域外制度，在結合我國實際情況的基礎上，嘗試借鑒域外制度和實踐經驗，以圖完善我國的專利確認不侵權制度。本文共分為四部分： 第一章先論述專利確認不侵權之訴的定義與性質，然后介紹了此類訴訟的發(fā)展歷程和制度價值，最后辨析專利確認不侵權之訴與其他相關訴訟的關系，突出在專利領域引入確認不侵權訴訟制度的必要性。 第二章對我國專利確認不侵權之訴的現狀進行考察，集中分析了我國專利確認不侵權之訴的受理條件、管轄和審判，同時提出我國專利確認不侵權之訴在實踐中所遇到的困境。 第三章考察了域外的專利確認不侵權之訴制度，并主要探討了英美日德以及我國澳門臺灣地區(qū)的專利確認不侵權之訴的受理條件、管轄法院和審判制度，并分析其對我國專利確認不侵權之訴的借鑒意義，以圖能為我國專利確認不侵權之訴的制度完善帶來參考意義。 第四章主要針對我國專利確認不侵權之訴的制度完善進行探討，并結合第二、三章的研究成果，嘗試從專利確認不侵權之訴的受理條件、管轄法院和審判制度等方面提出改善建議。
[Abstract]:In our country , the abuse of power by the patent holder has occurred , and the author has issued a warning letter to his competitors , and has not been charged to the court in a long period of time . It has not only caused the loss to the power but also the market competition . It is a pity that this kind of litigation has many problems in theory and practice . It is a pity that no infringement is made in theory and practice . It is a pity that this kind of litigation has many problems in theory and practice . It is a pity that the patent recognition does not infringe the right of infringement . In the light of the practical situation of our country , the author tries to draw lessons from the extraterritorial system and practical experience to perfect the patent recognition non - infringement system in our country .

The first chapter discusses the definition and nature of the patent recognition non - infringement , then introduces the development course and the system value of such litigation , and finally analyzes the relation between the patent recognition non - infringement and other relevant litigation , and highlights the necessity of confirming the non - infringement litigation system in the patent field .

The second chapter investigates the current situation of patent recognition non - infringement in our country , analyzes the acceptance condition , jurisdiction and trial of the patent recognition non - infringement in our country , and puts forward the dilemma that the patent recognition does not infringe in practice in practice .

The third chapter examines the system of patent recognition non - infringement in China and mainly discusses the admissibility condition , jurisdiction court and trial system of patent recognition non - infringement in China and Japan , and analyzes its reference significance to the patent recognition non - infringement of our country , so as to bring the reference significance for the perfection of the system of patent recognition and non - infringement .

In the fourth chapter , the author probes into the perfection of the system of patent recognition non - infringement in our country , and combines the research results of the second and third chapters , and attempts to improve the suggestions from the aspects of patent recognition , acceptance condition , jurisdiction court and trial system .
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42;D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 江早云;;知識產權案件確認不侵權之訴的法院管轄[J];中華商標;2005年12期

2 郭瑩;閆文軍;;確認不侵犯專利權之訴的受理條件研究[J];北京政法職業(yè)學院學報;2012年02期

3 孫海龍;姚建軍;;對確認不侵犯專利權法律問題的探討[J];電子知識產權;2008年02期

4 郭偉;;基于平衡視角論域名確認不侵權案件的受理條件[J];電子知識產權;2012年03期

5 周平;;淺析知識產權確認不侵權訴訟的受理條件[J];發(fā)明與創(chuàng)新(綜合版);2008年12期

6 陳鈞;;對確認不侵權之訴有關問題的研究[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2010年04期

7 徐輝鴻;;知識產權確認不侵權之訴受理條件探析[J];法學雜志;2006年05期

8 趙蕾;;確認不侵權之訴的理論探討及程序細化——以民事訴訟為視角的分析[J];法治研究;2011年01期

9 熊亮;;論知識產權領域確認不侵權訴訟的訴的利益[J];甘肅理論學刊;2011年02期

10 易玲;;知識產權確認不侵權訴訟之法律性質探析[J];公民與法(法學);2010年12期

，

本文編號：2000560