本文選題：刑事證人 + 出庭作證��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事證人出庭作證是維護(hù)程序正義和確保實體正義的需要，是檢驗審判公正的試金石，但是在我國的司法實踐當(dāng)中，證人出庭難的現(xiàn)狀至今仍未改變，證人出庭率低一直都是真實的擺在我們面前的難題。完善我國的刑事證人出庭作證制度有著重大的現(xiàn)實意義和司法完善的象征意義。2012年3月14日全國人大通過了修改后的刑事訴訟法，本文從刑事證人出庭作證的基本知識入手介紹并以此次新刑事訴訟法的修改為契機，逐步深入進(jìn)行討論。 首先，介紹了我國刑事證人出庭作證的基本知識、理論淵源，包括證人出庭作證的概述、證人出庭作證的必要性討論以及證人作證的理論基礎(chǔ)性原則。 其次，是對國外刑事證人出庭作證的制度進(jìn)行了考察與評析，其中主要是證人出庭作證方面立法比較完善的英美法系和大陸法系的典型國家進(jìn)行的考察。 再次，分析我國新刑事法修改前的證人出庭作證的狀況及造成這種狀況的深層次原因，對新修訂的刑事訴訟法中證人出庭作證部分的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行詳細(xì)而全面的解讀，肯定此次修改對于我國證人出庭現(xiàn)狀改善的積極意義。深刻剖析挖掘出此次修改中的立法不足之處，包括一些模糊的性表述，缺乏可操作性的規(guī)定以及一些法律仍未涉及到的空白制度等。 最后，結(jié)合我國的具體國情積極的借鑒國內(nèi)外立法的優(yōu)點，在此次修改刑訴法的基礎(chǔ)上提出了進(jìn)一步完善我國證人出庭制度的一些新的嘗試，涉及到進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大證人免證權(quán)、設(shè)立專門的證人保護(hù)法對擴(kuò)大證人保護(hù)范圍，明確證人保護(hù)機構(gòu)、證人保護(hù)不力的責(zé)任劃分以及增加和細(xì)化、改進(jìn)證人保護(hù)措施等內(nèi)容的規(guī)定從而形成比較完善證人保護(hù)的體系、完善對拒絕作證的證人的責(zé)任追究機制、嘗試建立證人宣誓制度等，以期通過這些努力能對我國證人出庭作證率低的現(xiàn)狀的改善起到積極的作用。
[Abstract]:The criminal witness appearing in court to testify is the need to safeguard the procedural justice and ensure the substantive justice, and is the touchstone to test the justice of the trial. However, in the judicial practice of our country, the present situation of the difficulty of the witness appearing in court has not changed up to now. The low attendance rate of witnesses has always been a real problem in front of us. It is of great practical significance and symbolic significance to perfect the system of criminal witness appearing in court in our country. On March 14, 2012, the National people's Congress adopted the revised Criminal procedure Law. This paper introduces the basic knowledge of the criminal witness testifying in court and discusses it step by step with the opportunity of the revision of the new criminal procedure law. First of all, it introduces the basic knowledge and theoretical origin of criminal witnesses appearing in court in our country, including the summary of witnesses appearing in court, the necessity of witnesses to testify in court and the basic theoretical principles of witnesses testifying. Secondly, it makes an investigation and analysis on the system of foreign criminal witnesses appearing in court, mainly from the typical countries of Anglo-American law system and continental law system, where the legislation of witness appearing in court is relatively perfect. Thirdly, the paper analyzes the state of the witnesses appearing in court before the revision of the new criminal law of our country and the deep-seated reasons for this situation, and makes a detailed and comprehensive interpretation of the contents of the part of the witness appearing in court as a witness in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law. Affirm this revision to our country witness present situation to appear in court to improve the positive meaning. It deeply analyzes and excavates the legislative deficiencies in this revision, including some vague statements, lack of operational regulations and blank systems which are still not involved in some laws and so on. Finally, according to the specific conditions of our country and the advantages of domestic and foreign legislation, this paper puts forward some new attempts to further improve the system of witness appearance in our country on the basis of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law, which involves the further expansion of the right to exempt witnesses from testifying. The establishment of a special witness protection law will expand the scope of witness protection, clarify the witness protection organization, divide the responsibility of witness protection insufficiently, and increase and refine the scope of witness protection. To improve the provisions of witness protection measures so as to form a relatively perfect witness protection system, to perfect the accountability mechanism for witnesses who refuse to testify, and to try to establish a witness oath system, etc. Through these efforts, it can play a positive role in improving the present situation of the low rate of witnesses appearing in court in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟傳香;;刑事證人保護(hù)制度研究[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年10期

2 陳瑞華;法治視野下的證人保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2002年03期

3 王馨婧;;對刑事證人出庭作證的思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2010年02期

4 楊雄;;證人出庭作證制度的立法發(fā)展與困境[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

5 章禮明;;證人出庭“難”的文化類型學(xué)解釋——兼評新《刑事訴訟法》中相關(guān)規(guī)則的實效性[J];河北法學(xué);2012年10期

6 劉權(quán);;新《刑事訴訟法》視野下證人保護(hù)制度的思考[J];河北科技師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年03期

7 童道才,彭竣;對刑事訴訟證人出庭作證的幾點思考[J];人民司法;1997年11期

8 陳衛(wèi)東;;讓證人走向法庭——刑事案件證人出庭作證制度研究[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期

9 汪建成,楊雄;警察作證制度的理論推演與實證分析[J];政法論壇;2003年04期

10 左衛(wèi)民;馬靜華;;刑事證人出庭率:一種基于實證研究的理論闡述[J];中國法學(xué);2005年06期

，

本文編號：1979490