本文選題：不起訴審查 + 訴訟化��； 參考：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：檢察官的起訴裁量權，是檢察機關最核心的權力，，包括指控犯罪和不起訴兩方面。2012年修改的《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》（以下簡稱《刑事訴訟法》）不僅保留了檢察機關擁有絕對不起訴、相對不起訴、存疑不起訴等訴訟程序終結權，還增加了附條件不起訴的裁量權，對訴訟民主、訴訟文明、訴訟公開提出了更高的要求。在寬嚴相濟的刑事政策下，隨著檢察機關不起訴裁量權的擴大，如何加強不起訴裁量權的監(jiān)督和制約成為我國不起訴制度面臨的新課題。 多年來，我國檢察機關作出不起訴審查與決定的過程具有較大的行政化色彩，缺乏公開性和透明度，容易使社會公眾對其公正性產生質疑。因此，有必要對我國的不起訴審查制度進行改革。在我國已經試行十余年的不起訴公開審查制度，作為對不起訴制度的改革探索，在一定程度上增強了不起訴決定環(huán)節(jié)的訴訟性、公開性和公正性。在當前我國審查起訴程序缺乏典型的三方構造、引入司法審查制度不具備現(xiàn)實可能性的刑事司法現(xiàn)狀下，我國對不起訴審查制度的改革應遵循“相對合理主義”的道路，以我國不起訴公開審查制度的技術性改良為切入點，對我國不起訴審查制度進行訴訟化改造，使我國的不起訴決定程序訴訟化。 本文從不起訴審查制度訴訟化的基本理論出發(fā)，采用比較研究的方法，通過對我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的必要性與可行性進行論證，在對我國不起訴公開審查制度現(xiàn)狀進行考察和分析的基礎上，借鑒大陸法系、英美法系代表國家的不起訴制約機制的經驗，提出對我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的初步設想，期待通過對不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的具體設計，讓不起訴決定過程更加公開化、透明化。本文主要分為以下五章： 第一章為不起訴審查制度訴訟化的基本理論概述。本章首先對不起訴審查制度的涵義與我國不起訴審查的模式進行介紹，隨后在對刑事訴訟構造特征進行考察的基礎上，對我國不起訴審查制度應具有的訴訟構造進行探討，最后指出我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的切入點。 第二章為我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的必要性與可行性。本章從必要性和可能性兩個角度對我國不起訴審查制度的訴訟化改造進行分析論證。 第三章為我國不起訴公開審查制度的現(xiàn)狀與分析。本章首先對我國不起訴公開審查制度的產生和發(fā)展進行考察，隨后對該制度的司法實踐現(xiàn)狀進行分析，最后對該制度目前存在的問題進行總結。 第四章為不起訴審查制度訴訟化的域外借鑒。本章對大陸法系與英美法系代表國家的不起訴制約機制進行分析和總結，為我國不起訴審查制度的訴訟化改造提供借鑒。 第五章為我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的初步設想。本章首先對不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造應遵循的基本原則進行介紹，隨后在基本原則的指導下，借鑒我國不起訴公開審查制度和域外國家不起訴制約機制的有益經驗，提出對我國不起訴審查制度訴訟化改造的具體設計。
[Abstract]:The prosecutor's discretion in prosecution is the most important power of the procuratorial organ, including the two aspects of the charge of crime and non prosecution in the "Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Procedure Law), which has been amended in the two aspects of the accusation of crime and non prosecution. The procuratorial organs not only retain the right of the procuratorial organs to have the absolute non prosecution, relative non prosecution, doubt and non prosecution, but also increase the right to end the proceedings. Adding the discretion of conditional non prosecution, it puts forward higher requirements for litigation democracy, litigation civilization and public litigation. Under the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy, with the expansion of the procuratorial organ's non prosecution discretion, how to strengthen the supervision and restriction of non prosecution discretion has become a new subject in China's non prosecution system.
Over the years, the process of examining and deciding on non prosecution in the procuratorial organs of our country has great administrative color, lack of openness and transparency, which makes it easy for the public to question its impartiality. Therefore, it is necessary to reform the system of non prosecution examination in our country. As the reform exploration of the system of "sorry," to a certain extent, it has strengthened the litigation, openness and impartiality of the decision link of non prosecution. In the current situation of the lack of typical three party structure in the procedure of examination and prosecution in our country and the present situation of criminal justice which does not have the practical possibility of the judicial review system, the reform of our country's sorry prosecution system should be carried out. Following the road of "relative rationalism", taking the technical improvement of the system of public review of non prosecution in our country as the breakthrough point, the reform of our country's non prosecution examination system is proceeding lawfully, and the procedure of the decision procedure of non prosecution in our country is lawless.
On the basis of the basic theory of the litigation of the non prosecution examination system, this paper adopts the method of comparative study to demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of the procedural transformation of the non prosecution examination system in China, and on the basis of the investigation and analysis of the present situation of the public examination system of non prosecution in China, and on the basis of the continental law system and the Anglo American law system represent the country. On the basis of the experience of the non prosecution and restriction mechanism, this paper puts forward the tentative idea of the procedural transformation of the non prosecution review system in China, and expects to make the process of the non prosecution more open and transparent through the concrete design of the procedural transformation of the system of the sorry prosecution review. This article is divided into the following five chapters:
The first chapter is an overview of the basic theory of the litigation of the non prosecution review system. First, I am sorry to introduce the meaning of the system and the mode of the non prosecution examination in our country. Then, on the basis of the investigation of the structural characteristics of the criminal procedure, the paper discusses the litigation structure of the non prosecution examination system in our country, and finally points out that I have the structure of the lawsuit. The entry point of Litigation Reform for non prosecution system.
The second chapter is the necessity and feasibility of the procedural transformation of the non prosecution examination system in China. This chapter analyzes and demonstrates the procedural transformation of the non prosecution examination system in China from the two angles of necessity and possibility.
The third chapter is the present situation and analysis of the public review system of non prosecution in China. This chapter first investigates the emergence and development of the public review system of non prosecution in China, and then analyzes the current situation of the judicial practice of the system, and finally summarizes the existing problems of the system.
The fourth chapter is the extraterritorial reference for the litigation of the non prosecution review system. This chapter analyses and summarizes the non prosecution restriction mechanism of the representative countries of the continental law system and the Anglo American law system, and provides the reference for the Litigation Reform of the non prosecution examination system in China.
The fifth chapter is the tentative idea of the procedural transformation of the non prosecution examination system in China. This chapter first introduces the basic principles that should be followed in the procedural reform of the system of complaint review, and then, under the guidance of the basic principles, draw on our country's non prosecution open review system and the beneficial experience of the non prosecution restriction mechanism of foreign countries, and put forward to our country. The concrete design of Litigation Reform of non prosecution review system.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 詹建紅;李紀亮;;困境與出路:我國刑事程序分流的制度化[J];當代法學;2011年06期

2 陳佳;;我國不起訴聽證可行性機制探討——以廈門市集美區(qū)人民檢察院不起訴公開審查會為例[J];法制與經濟(中旬刊);2011年08期

3 李靜;;淺析不起訴公開審查制度[J];學理論;2010年21期

4 龍宗智;為什么要實行主訴檢察官辦案責任制———論主訴檢察官辦案責任制[J];人民檢察;2000年01期

5 王松苗;公訴改革:能否兩全其美?──關于公訴工作改革重心的采訪與思索[J];人民檢察;2000年10期

6 謝暉;;法律的意義模糊及其救濟方法[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2009年01期

7 屈玲玲;;檢察院里的“檢察庭” 徐匯區(qū)人民檢察院探索不訴權司法化新路徑[J];檢察風云;2013年14期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 葉青;刑事審前程序訴訟化問題研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年

2 陳海鋒;刑事審查起訴程序正當性完善研究[D];華東政法大學;2013年

本文編號：1979075