本文選題：公訴案件 + 刑事和解　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事司法政策的背景之下,一種通過(guò)被害人與加害人之間的協(xié)商,由加害人給予被害人賠償、恢復(fù)被破壞的社會(huì)關(guān)系,并因此對(duì)加害人進(jìn)行從寬處理的刑事和解制度應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。伴隨著傳統(tǒng)刑事司法理論上的困境,刑事和解制度自產(chǎn)生以來(lái)就作為一種全新的刑事沖突應(yīng)對(duì)模式而存在。刑事和解既能夠幫助犯罪人確立新的生活態(tài)度與行為模式,使其重新回歸社會(huì)；又能夠幫助被害人恢復(fù)損害,重建其安全感。作為一種新型的糾紛解決機(jī)制,刑事和解制度自20世紀(jì)70年代以來(lái)已經(jīng)被許多國(guó)家采納并應(yīng)用于刑事案件中。近年來(lái),隨著我國(guó)司法改革的不斷推進(jìn),越來(lái)越多的地方對(duì)刑事和解進(jìn)行了一些積極的、有意義的探索。正是基于刑事和解制度的本身價(jià)值和多年來(lái)司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的總結(jié),我國(guó)在2012年新修訂的《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱新《刑事訴訟法》)中正式規(guī)定了刑事和解制度,賦予其合法地位。這標(biāo)志著我國(guó)的法治進(jìn)程邁向了更加注重人權(quán)保障的重要一步。然而,新《刑事訴訟法》對(duì)于刑事和解的適用只是剛剛開(kāi)始,司法實(shí)踐中仍然存在著很多模糊不明確的問(wèn)題需要我們繼續(xù)探索。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分,主要運(yùn)用理論分析、文獻(xiàn)分析、比較分析的方法就我國(guó)公訴案件的刑事和解制度進(jìn)行探討。第一部分著重介紹了刑事和解制度的基本理論,在明確了刑事和解的含義、性質(zhì)及特征的基礎(chǔ)之上,針對(duì)刑事和解的理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行分析,從而為刑事和解的司法實(shí)踐提供理論上的依托。第二部分主要介紹刑事和解制度在大陸法系和英美法系國(guó)家的發(fā)展概況,通過(guò)對(duì)比西方國(guó)家的發(fā)展概況進(jìn)而分析總結(jié)出西方刑事和解制度的主要特點(diǎn)與啟示,以期為我國(guó)刑事和解的理論與實(shí)踐提供參考和借鑒。第三部分是著重論述了我國(guó)公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解的立法現(xiàn)狀及存在問(wèn)題。通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)新《刑事訴訟法》的深入解讀,我們不難發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)的刑事和解制度仍然存在需要完善的一些地方。第四部分針對(duì)如何完善我國(guó)公訴案件的刑事和解制度,筆者提出了四個(gè)方面的建議,包括確立刑事和解的基本原則、進(jìn)一步完善刑事和解的法律規(guī)定、健全刑事和解的法律監(jiān)督機(jī)制和完善相關(guān)的配套制度建設(shè),以期為進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)的刑事和解制度提供有益參考。
[Abstract]:In the context of the criminal justice policy of combining leniency and severity, a kind of social relationship that is restored through consultation between the victim and the perpetrator, where the victim is compensated by the perpetrator, Therefore, the lenient criminal reconciliation system emerges as the times require. With the dilemma of the traditional criminal justice theory, the criminal reconciliation system has existed as a new criminal conflict response model since its emergence. Criminal reconciliation can not only help the offender establish a new life attitude and behavior pattern, but also help the victim to recover the damage and rebuild his sense of security. As a new type of dispute settlement mechanism, criminal reconciliation system has been adopted and applied in many countries since 1970s. In recent years, with the continuous promotion of judicial reform in China, more and more places have carried out some positive and meaningful exploration on criminal reconciliation. It is based on the value of the criminal reconciliation system and the summary of judicial practice for many years, our country formally stipulated the criminal reconciliation system in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the New Criminal procedure Law) in 2012. Give him legal status. This marks an important step in the process of our country's rule of law towards paying more attention to the protection of human rights. However, the application of the new Criminal procedure Law to the criminal reconciliation is just beginning, and there are still many vague and ambiguous problems in the judicial practice that need us to continue to explore. This article is divided into four parts, mainly using the methods of theoretical analysis, literature analysis and comparative analysis to discuss the criminal reconciliation system of public prosecution cases in China. The first part mainly introduces the basic theory of the criminal reconciliation system. On the basis of defining the meaning, nature and characteristics of the criminal reconciliation, it analyzes the theoretical basis of the criminal reconciliation. Thus provides the theoretical support for the judicial practice of criminal reconciliation. The second part mainly introduces the development of the criminal reconciliation system in the continental law system and the common law system countries, and then analyzes and summarizes the main characteristics and enlightenment of the western criminal reconciliation system by comparing the development general situation of the western countries. In order to provide reference for the theory and practice of criminal reconciliation in China. The third part focuses on the legislative status and existing problems of party reconciliation in public prosecution cases in China. Through the thorough interpretation of the new Criminal procedure Law of our country, it is not difficult to find out that there are still some places that need to be perfected in the criminal reconciliation system of our country. In the fourth part, the author puts forward four suggestions on how to perfect the criminal reconciliation system of public prosecution cases in our country, including establishing the basic principles of criminal reconciliation and further perfecting the legal provisions of criminal reconciliation. Improve the legal supervision mechanism of criminal reconciliation and improve the relevant supporting system construction, in order to further improve the criminal reconciliation system in China to provide a useful reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 樊崇義;王文生;;關(guān)于刑事和解的若干問(wèn)題探討[J];中國(guó)司法;2009年01期

2 馬靜華;羅寧;;西方刑事和解制度考略[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

3 孫力,劉中發(fā);暫緩起訴制度再研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年05期

4 陳興良;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

5 劉凌梅;西方國(guó)家刑事和解理論與實(shí)踐介評(píng)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年01期

6 陳光中;葛琳;;刑事和解初探[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年05期

7 陳瑞華;;刑事訴訟的私力合作模式——刑事和解在中國(guó)的興起[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年05期

8 李忠誠(chéng);關(guān)于恢復(fù)性司法方案中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)律師;2002年09期

9 宋英輝;;刑事和解的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

10 陳光中;彭東;王公義;樊崇義;左衛(wèi)民;李愛(ài)君;皇甫覺(jué)新;王丹;傅文魁;王金鳳;卞建林;李貴方;閔釤;王敏遠(yuǎn);熊秋紅;張建偉;鄒開(kāi)紅;翁躍強(qiáng);李建明;丁建勤;莊文生;周光權(quán);龍宗智;田文昌;谷雄偉;葉青;周欣;甄貞;王洪祥;宋英輝;;刑事和解實(shí)證研究觀點(diǎn)擷錄[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1978102