本文選題：偵查實(shí)驗(yàn) + 重新演示��； 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)刑事訴訟法的歷史上,關(guān)于偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)的規(guī)定一直是借鑒前蘇聯(lián)的做法,只是僅僅作為一種偵查措施規(guī)定在勘驗(yàn)、檢查一節(jié)中,通常只是用來驗(yàn)證犯罪嫌疑人供述、被害人陳述已經(jīng)證人證言的真實(shí)性,大多時(shí)候只是作為偵查手段來尋找破案的線索,并沒有賦予其證據(jù)的身份。直到2013年1月1日生效的中華人民共和國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》中第一次將偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄作為證據(jù)的一種寫進(jìn)了《刑事訴訟法》的第四十八條中,偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄的證據(jù)身份才得以合法化。 學(xué)術(shù)界目前也并沒有就偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)及偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄這個(gè)問題上升為理論層次,主要表現(xiàn)為在眾多的著作中都是輕描淡寫,并沒有進(jìn)行深層次的研究,鮮見此方面的專著,所以可以說偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)在實(shí)際操作中并沒有理論基礎(chǔ)。實(shí)務(wù)界更是如此,筆者深入到基層公安機(jī)關(guān)和法院系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行調(diào)研,發(fā)現(xiàn)公安機(jī)關(guān)雖然知道現(xiàn)在偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄可以作為證據(jù)適用,但是由于偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)涉及物理、化學(xué)、生物等等方面的知識(shí)太過廣泛,基層人才又匱乏,所以在運(yùn)用偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)的時(shí)候會(huì)覺得缺少理論依據(jù),無從下手,以至于實(shí)驗(yàn)過程五花八門。 具體來說,本文擬從四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行研究。首先是從偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)的基本問題入手,厘清偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)基本內(nèi)容；其次對(duì)偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)的程序進(jìn)行研究,深入了解偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)的實(shí)施過程；再次對(duì)偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄的審查與運(yùn)用進(jìn)行分析；最后就偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄證據(jù)化過程中存在的立法過于籠統(tǒng)、實(shí)驗(yàn)主體過于單一、筆錄證據(jù)實(shí)用過量、證據(jù)分類過于封閉這四個(gè)問題進(jìn)行分析并提出些可行的對(duì)策,以解決偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄證據(jù)化過程中存在的問題。
[Abstract]:In the history of our country's criminal procedure law, the provisions on investigation experiments have always been based on the practice of the former Soviet Union, but only as a kind of investigative measures, in the section of investigation and inspection, they are usually used only to verify the statements of criminal suspects. The victim's statement has been the truth of the witness's testimony, most of the time it is only as a means of investigation to find the clues to solve the case, and does not give him the identity of the evidence. Until the people's Republic of China's Criminal procedure Law, which entered into force on January 1, 2013, for the first time, a record of the investigation experiment as evidence was included in article 48 of the Criminal procedure Code, Only the evidence status of the record of the investigation experiment can be legalized. At present, the academic circles have not raised the issue of investigation experiments and transcripts of investigation experiments to a theoretical level, mainly showing that they are understated in many works, and have not carried out in-depth research. Few monographs have been written in this respect. So it can be said that the investigation experiment has no theoretical basis in the actual operation. This is especially true in the practical circles. The author went deep into the grass-roots public security organs and the court system to investigate, and found that although the public security organs know that the records of the investigation experiments can be used as evidence now, but because the investigation experiments involve physics and chemistry, Biology and other aspects of knowledge is too extensive, grass-roots talent is scarce, so in the use of investigative experiments will feel that the lack of theoretical basis, can not start, so that the experimental process is varied. Specifically, this paper intends to study from four aspects. First of all, starting with the basic problems of the investigation experiment, it clarifies the basic contents of the investigation experiment; secondly, it studies the procedure of the investigation experiment, deeply understand the implementation process of the investigation experiment; again, it analyzes the examination and application of the record of the investigation experiment. Finally, this paper analyzes the four problems of the legislation in the process of evidentization of the investigation experiment record, such as too general legislation, too single experimental subject, excessive practical evidence, too close classification of evidence, and puts forward some feasible countermeasures. In order to solve the problems existing in the process of evidence conversion in the record of investigation experiment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田口守一;張凌;;日本裁判員制度的創(chuàng)設(shè)與證據(jù)法的變動(dòng)[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2008年05期

2 吳專生;許越騁;;偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄、搜查筆錄、辨認(rèn)筆錄證據(jù)能力探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年28期

3 傅曉海;淺析犯罪現(xiàn)場(chǎng)模擬[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2002年01期

4 薛麗婷;;析偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)、搜查、辨認(rèn)三種筆錄的證據(jù)能力[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 黃道誠(chéng);;中國(guó)古代偵查方法及對(duì)現(xiàn)代偵查的啟示——以《折獄龜鑒》為視角[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

6 馬楠楠;;淺議偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

7 柯昌林;;偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)筆錄的證據(jù)歸屬分析[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

8 龍宗智;證據(jù)分類制度及其改革[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年05期

9 陳瑞華;;案卷筆錄中心主義——對(duì)中國(guó)刑事審判方式的重新考察[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年04期

10 黃建平;;論偵查實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)論的證據(jù)效力[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃道誠(chéng);宋代偵查制度與技術(shù)研究[D];河北大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1970095