本文選題：法庭話語 + 減責(zé)策略�。� 參考：《學(xué)習(xí)與探索》2017年05期

【摘要】：黨的十八屆四中全會明確提出了以審判為中心的改革方向,要求偵查、起訴和辯護等各訴訟環(huán)節(jié)都必須圍繞審判來展開。這一要求不僅從程序上確保了司法公正,也是現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟發(fā)展的新常態(tài)。在這一背景下,“快播案”正是以審判為中心進行訴訟的一個范例和有益嘗試。以Martinovski的減責(zé)策略為理論指導(dǎo),分析“快播案”中控辯雙方所使用的辯護策略,對“接受”“預(yù)防”及“反擊”等三個話語步驟的實現(xiàn)過程進行描述與闡釋,可以進一步明晰法庭話語減責(zé)策略在個案中的應(yīng)用,從而推進以審判為中心的司法公開和司法公正。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee clearly put forward the reform direction of taking the trial as the center, and demanded that the investigation, prosecution and defense should be carried out around the trial. This requirement not only ensures the judicial justice from the procedure, but also is the new normal of the development of the modern criminal procedure. In this context, the trial-centric litigation is an example and a useful attempt. Under the guidance of Martinovski's duty abatement strategy, this paper analyzes the defense strategies used by both the prosecution and the defense in "Quick broadcast case", and describes and interprets the realization process of the three discourse steps of "accepting" prevention "and" counterattack ". It can further clarify the application of court discourse abatement strategy in individual cases, so as to promote judicial openness and justice centered on trial.
，

本文編號：1944630