天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 訴訟法論文 >

試論小額訴訟程序的制度完善

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-27 09:05

  本文選題:小額訴訟 + 局限性。 參考:《上海交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文


【摘要】:小額訴訟程序是指專門針對(duì)輕微小額案件設(shè)計(jì)的一種獨(dú)立的訴訟程序,其目的不僅在于通過多元化途徑促進(jìn)糾紛解決以提高審判效率,更在于體現(xiàn)司法為民的理念。隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的高速發(fā)展,國人對(duì)司法的需求也日趨增加,有學(xué)者提議在我國法律體系中增設(shè)小額訴訟程序。2011年10月,民事訴訟法開始修改,當(dāng)時(shí)在民訴法修正案(第一稿)中的簡易程序篇內(nèi)增設(shè)了“基層人民法院和它的派出法庭審理標(biāo)的額人民幣五千元以下的民事案件,實(shí)行一審終審”的條文,突破性地將小額訴訟寫入了我國的法條之中。最終經(jīng)過多方討論,民訴法定稿時(shí)對(duì)小額訴訟程序的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了調(diào)整。設(shè)立小額訴訟程序?qū)ξ覈痉w系來說是一個(gè)突破性的進(jìn)展,但我們對(duì)此不能盲目樂觀,因?yàn)樾旅裨V法中僅對(duì)小額訴訟做了一條原則性的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的規(guī)定,實(shí)踐中仍有許多具體問題亟待明確,因此相對(duì)于其他早已設(shè)立小額訴訟程序的國家而言,我國的小額訴訟程序存在一定的局限性和制度缺失,如果我們不制定相關(guān)的配套措施,小額訴訟程序的設(shè)置很有可能將流于形式而無法達(dá)到國家預(yù)期設(shè)立該項(xiàng)程序的法律效果及社會(huì)效應(yīng)。本文筆者試圖在司法實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合世界各國的立法體例,,對(duì)我國設(shè)立小額訴訟程序時(shí)的制度缺失進(jìn)行相應(yīng)地論述,并提出一定的建議,力求完善我國的小額訴訟程序。 本文主要分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分主要闡述小額訴訟程序在我國的確立;第二部分主要闡述域外小額訴訟程序的立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和受理規(guī)則;第三部分主要論述小額訴訟程序在我國司法適用中的制度缺失;最后一部分就如何構(gòu)建符合我國國情的小額訴訟程序提出相應(yīng)的建議。
[Abstract]:Small claims procedure is a kind of independent litigation procedure designed specifically for minor small cases. Its purpose is not only to promote dispute resolution through multiple channels to improve trial efficiency, but also to embody the concept of justice for the people. With the rapid development of our country's economy and society, the Chinese people's demand for justice is also increasing day by day. Some scholars have proposed to establish a small amount of litigation procedure in our legal system. In October 2011, the Civil procedure Law began to be amended. At that time, in the section on summary procedures in the amendment to the Civil procedure Law (the first draft), a provision was added that "the grassroots people's court and its dispatched court shall hear civil cases of less than 5,000 yuan in the amount of the target, and carry out the final appeal of the first instance." A breakthrough will be written into the small-claims in our country in the law. Finally, after various discussions, the civil action law was finalized to adjust the applicable standards of small claims. The establishment of the small claims procedure is a breakthrough for the judicial system of our country, but we should not be blindly optimistic about this, because the new civil litigation law only makes a provision of a principled applicable standard for small claims. In practice, there are still many specific problems that need to be clarified. Therefore, compared with other countries that have already established small claims proceedings, there are some limitations and institutional deficiencies in our small claims proceedings, if we do not formulate relevant supporting measures, The setting of small claims procedure is likely to be formalized and unable to achieve the legal and social effects of the procedure expected by the state. On the basis of judicial practice, the author tries to make a corresponding exposition on the lack of the system when establishing the small claims procedure in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the small claims procedure in our country, combined with the legislation style of the countries all over the world. This article is mainly divided into four parts, the first part mainly expounds the establishment of small claims procedure in our country, the second part mainly expounds the standards of filing and accepting rules of foreign small claims procedure. The third part mainly discusses the system deficiency of the small claims procedure in the judicial application of our country; the last part puts forward the corresponding suggestions on how to construct the small claims procedure in accordance with the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范愉;;司法資源供求失衡的悖論與對(duì)策 以小額訴訟為切入點(diǎn)[J];法律適用;2011年03期

2 李江蓉;;論小額訴訟制度的司法困境與制度構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2012年08期

3 廖中洪;;小額訴訟立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與受理規(guī)則比較研究——兼論我國小額訴訟程序的立法完善[J];法治研究;2012年09期

4 劉仲屹;王保民;;小額訴訟程序及其在我國民事訴訟法修改中的完善[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

5 徐超;;淺論我國的小額訴訟程序——兼論與簡易程序之關(guān)系[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

6 肖建華;唐玉富;;小額訴訟制度建構(gòu)的理性思考[J];河北法學(xué);2012年08期

7 黃海榕;陳奧琳;;我國小額訴訟制度探究[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年12期

8 夏梓耀;;我國民事訴訟引入小額訴訟程序的思考——以《民事訴訟法》修改為視角[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2012年01期

9 齊樹潔;;構(gòu)建小額訴訟程序若干問題之探討[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

10 范愉;小額訴訟程序研究[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年03期



本文編號(hào):1941357

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1941357.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶3de95***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com