本文選題：民事證據(jù) + 失權(quán)　； 參考：《黑龍江大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：證據(jù)是訴訟取勝的關(guān)鍵核心，其重要性自是不必說明。當事人的訴訟主張能否得到法院支持取決于雙方所擁有的證據(jù)，證據(jù)失權(quán)制度能夠保障庭審中證據(jù)合理收集，訴訟程序公正，維護訴訟安定�，F(xiàn)階段，，我國民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度并不是十分成熟，對司法實務(wù)中諸多困難問題無法解決，導(dǎo)致我國民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度在審判實務(wù)中無法得到良好應(yīng)用，不僅當事人權(quán)益無法得到保障，而且實踐中司法工作人員對于民事證據(jù)失權(quán)的適用也多持著消極態(tài)度，致使此項制度經(jīng)常處于閑置狀態(tài)，難以發(fā)揮其真正應(yīng)有的效用。對于民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度在司法實踐中面臨的困境，文章通過民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度的基本內(nèi)容，民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度的歷時性審視和民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度完善三個部分闡釋了民事證據(jù)失權(quán)制度對我國證據(jù)制度和訴訟程序的重要性。
[Abstract]:Evidence is the key to the success of litigation, and its importance should not be explained. Whether the litigants' claims can be supported by the court depends on the evidence owned by both parties. The system of evidence loss can guarantee the reasonable collection of evidence, the fairness of litigation procedure and the maintenance of litigation stability. At present, the system of loss of power of civil evidence in our country is not very mature, and many difficult problems in judicial practice can not be solved, resulting in the system of losing power of civil evidence in our country can not be applied well in trial practice. Not only the rights and interests of the parties can not be protected, but also the judicial staff hold a negative attitude towards the application of civil evidence loss in practice, which makes the system often idle and difficult to play its proper role. With regard to the dilemma faced by the civil evidence loss system in judicial practice, the article adopts the basic contents of the civil evidence loss system. The diachronic examination of the civil evidence loss system and the perfection of the civil evidence loss system explain the importance of the civil evidence loss system to the evidence system and the litigation procedure of our country.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.13

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉春梅;大陸法系民事訴訟證據(jù)排除規(guī)則及其借鑒[J];法商研究;2005年02期

2 趙鋼;民事訴訟證據(jù)制度的新發(fā)展——兼述舉證時限與證據(jù)交換制度[J];河南大學學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

3 顧玉彬;民事舉證時限制度之救濟方式的多元化初探——兼論民事舉證時限制度中的證據(jù)失權(quán)制度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2003年06期

4 張建權(quán);試論民事訴訟中的舉證時限制度——兼評最高人民法院《關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》中有關(guān)舉證時限的規(guī)定[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2004年02期

5 孫轍;新的證據(jù)與相對化的舉證時限制度[J];人民司法;2002年05期

6 湯維建;;兩大法系民事訴訟制度比較研究——以美、德為中心[J];訴訟法論叢;1998年01期

7 陳桂明,李仕春;程序安定論──以民事訴訟為對象的分析[J];政法論壇;1999年05期

8 羅曉斌;民事舉證時限制度芻議[J];政法學刊;2002年02期

9 蒲菊花;舉證時限制度的理性分析[J];浙江社會科學;2004年03期

10 江偉;孫邦清;;對我國舉證時限制度確立的反思[J];證據(jù)學論壇;2003年00期

本文編號：1920633