本文選題：指導(dǎo)性案例 + 事實(shí)拘束力　； 參考：《長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)歷來(lái)是傳統(tǒng)的成文法國(guó)家,成文法具有體系清晰、內(nèi)容完整、邏輯嚴(yán)密、結(jié)構(gòu)科學(xué)等優(yōu)點(diǎn)。但從具體的司法實(shí)踐來(lái)看,成文法也具有一定的局限性。例如其自身所具有的穩(wěn)定性及滯后性,決定了其很容易出現(xiàn)不能適應(yīng)社會(huì)不斷發(fā)展變化的形勢(shì)的情況,很多案件在為了實(shí)現(xiàn)遵守制定法中的形式的合法,與具體個(gè)案中對(duì)公平正義的要求之中進(jìn)退兩難,再加上制定法的修改和完善需要一個(gè)審慎和長(zhǎng)期的論證過(guò)程。因此目前我們面臨的亟需解決的問(wèn)題,就是如何在成文法的框架下,在不根本否定現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定的條件下,探索一種新的制度,以充分協(xié)調(diào)靈活性與穩(wěn)定性的關(guān)系,更好的適應(yīng)社會(huì)關(guān)系的急劇發(fā)展和變化。 鑒于此種情況,我們必然要探尋一種全新的制度,即具有中國(guó)特色的案例指導(dǎo)制度,具體在行政法領(lǐng)域中,鑒于行政法自身的諸多特性,例如在紛繁復(fù)雜的行政關(guān)系面前,難以形成統(tǒng)一的法典,行政成文法自身所具有的不周延性和抽象性也難以適應(yīng)社會(huì)發(fā)展的需要,司法能動(dòng)性不足,司法適用不統(tǒng)一等問(wèn)題,在行政法領(lǐng)域建立案例指導(dǎo)制度顯得尤為必要。近年來(lái),各級(jí)法院對(duì)于實(shí)行案例指導(dǎo)制度也進(jìn)行了很多積極性的探索,由此我們看出建立案例指導(dǎo)制度已經(jīng)在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)形成了共識(shí),但是其在具體的審判實(shí)踐中依舊面臨許多亟待解決的問(wèn)題,例如關(guān)于指導(dǎo)性案例的效力問(wèn)題、如何判斷待決案件與指導(dǎo)性案例的相似問(wèn)題以及指導(dǎo)性案例的適用方法問(wèn)題等諸多方面還存在一些爭(zhēng)議,因而極有可能導(dǎo)致法官在適用指導(dǎo)性案例的時(shí)候,會(huì)出現(xiàn)無(wú)所適從的狀況,本文是在通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)人員進(jìn)行調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)近年來(lái)發(fā)布的案例進(jìn)行了搜集和整理,著重針對(duì)上述幾個(gè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行闡釋,主要涉及目前我國(guó)行政案例指導(dǎo)制度所包含的基本問(wèn)題及其現(xiàn)狀分析,并試圖提出一些關(guān)于完善我國(guó)行政案例指導(dǎo)制度的建議,以供參考和借鑒。
[Abstract]:China has always been a traditional statutory country, written law has the advantages of clear system, complete content, strict logic, structural science and so on. But from the concrete judicial practice, the statute law also has the certain limitation. For example, its own stability and tardiness determine that it is easy for it to be unable to adapt to the changing situation of society. Many cases are in order to achieve the legitimacy of the form of compliance with the statute law. The dilemma with the demand for fairness and justice in specific cases, plus the revision and improvement of the formulation law, requires a prudent and long-term process of argumentation. Therefore, the urgent problem that we are now facing is how to explore a new system within the framework of statutory law and without fundamentally negating the provisions of the existing laws, in order to fully coordinate the relationship between flexibility and stability. Better adapt to the rapid development and change of social relations. In view of this situation, we must explore a new system, namely, the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics, in the field of administrative law, in view of the many characteristics of administrative law itself, such as in the face of complicated administrative relations. It is difficult to form a unified code of law, the administrative statute law itself has not comprehensive and abstract to meet the needs of social development, the lack of judicial initiative, judicial application is not uniform, and so on. It is necessary to establish case guidance system in the field of administrative law. In recent years, courts at all levels have also carried out many positive explorations on the implementation of the case guidance system. From this, we can see that the establishment of the case guidance system has formed a consensus across the country. However, it still faces many urgent problems in its specific trial practice, such as the effectiveness of guiding cases. There are still some controversies on how to judge the similarity between the pending case and the guiding case and the applicable method of the instructive case, so it is very likely that the judge will apply the instructive case. This paper collects and arranges the cases published in recent years on the basis of investigation and research on the relevant personnel, focusing on the explanation of the above several problems. This paper mainly deals with the basic problems and current situation analysis of administrative case guidance system in our country, and tries to put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the guiding system of administrative cases in our country for reference and reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張娟;;論案例指導(dǎo)制度[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

2 蘇澤林;李軒;;論司法統(tǒng)一與案例指導(dǎo)制度的完善[J];中國(guó)司法;2009年12期

3 周道鸞;中國(guó)案例制度的歷史發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2004年05期

4 蔣惠嶺;建立案例指導(dǎo)制度的幾個(gè)具體問(wèn)題[J];法律適用;2004年05期

5 陽(yáng)賢文;判例回歸環(huán)境的思考[J];法律適用;2004年05期

6 傅蔚蔚;張旭良;;試論我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度之建構(gòu)[J];法律適用;2006年Z1期

7 陳燦平;;案例指導(dǎo)制度中操作性難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

8 干朝端;建立以判例為主要形式的司法解釋體制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

9 周佑勇;;作為過(guò)渡措施的案例指導(dǎo)制度——以“行政[2005]004號(hào)案例”為觀察對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年03期

10 李仕春;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的另一條思路——司法能動(dòng)主義在中國(guó)的有限適用[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 丁海湖;案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1898026