本文選題：行政訴訟 + 立案登記制�。� 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：為解決“起訴難”的問題,保障當(dāng)事人的訴權(quán),十八屆四中全會(huì)提出:改革法院案件受理制度,變立案審查制為立案登記制,對(duì)人民法院依法應(yīng)該受理的案件,做到“有案必立、有訴必理”。借著《行政訴訟法》修改之際,立案登記制得以在行政訴訟領(lǐng)域率先實(shí)施。經(jīng)過一年的實(shí)施,該制度在立法中存在的問題及缺乏相應(yīng)的配套制度等問題逐漸暴露,使立案登記制難以得到落實(shí)。本文立足于司法實(shí)踐,通過對(duì)行政訴訟中立案登記制實(shí)施情況進(jìn)行調(diào)研和考察,同時(shí)結(jié)合理論知識(shí)對(duì)立案登記制的本質(zhì)內(nèi)涵、實(shí)施原因、實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題進(jìn)行全面系統(tǒng)的分析,提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策。本文除引言之外,分四部分進(jìn)行論述。第一部分明確行政訴訟立案登記制的概念,通過與立案審查制的比較闡述立案登記制的內(nèi)涵。在對(duì)我國的立案登記制有初步認(rèn)識(shí)的情況下比較域外立案登記制的概念及本質(zhì),從正反兩方面認(rèn)識(shí)現(xiàn)行行政訴訟法中的立案登記制。本部分從行政訴訟糾紛增多、行政訴權(quán)的發(fā)展、立案審查制的弊端、政策因素的導(dǎo)向四個(gè)方面來闡釋立案登記制在行政訴訟領(lǐng)域率先實(shí)行的原因,提出我國現(xiàn)行的立案登記制并非真正意義上的立案登記制,其實(shí)質(zhì)乃立案審查制。第二部分通過實(shí)地走訪、發(fā)放問卷、電話訪問等形式對(duì)寧波市若干法院、行政機(jī)關(guān)及一些行政訴訟相對(duì)人進(jìn)行調(diào)研并對(duì)調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,用圖表的形式證明在立案登記制實(shí)施后行政訴訟案件快速增長,案件類型呈現(xiàn)多元化趨勢。第三部分以第二部分為基礎(chǔ),從行政訴訟立案登記制實(shí)施后的現(xiàn)狀中總結(jié)現(xiàn)行制度存在問題的三個(gè)原因。第一個(gè)原因即現(xiàn)行立案登記制的立法存在缺陷,提出立法對(duì)行政起訴狀審查內(nèi)容未作明確規(guī)定、存在起訴要件與訴訟要件不分、對(duì)不予立案的監(jiān)督不明等問題。第二個(gè)原因是對(duì)行政濫訴規(guī)制程序的缺失。第三個(gè)原因是法院審判力量不足。正是由于這幾個(gè)因素的存在,使得立案登記制難以真正得到落實(shí)。第四部分針對(duì)上述問題立足本國國情,結(jié)合域外的立法、司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出區(qū)分起訴要件與訴訟要件、明確行政訴訟立案登記制審查內(nèi)容、對(duì)行政濫訴進(jìn)行規(guī)制、落實(shí)行政訴訟調(diào)解制度、加強(qiáng)行政審判力量等措施以落實(shí)立案登記制。
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of "difficult to prosecute" and to protect the litigant's right of action, the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed that: reform the system of accepting court cases, change the system of filing and examination into the system of filing and registration, and deal with cases that should be accepted by the people's courts according to law, To achieve "there is a case must be set up, there is a case must be reasonable." With the amendment of the Administrative procedure Law, the registration system can be first implemented in the field of administrative litigation. After one year's implementation, the problems existing in the legislation and the lack of corresponding supporting systems are gradually exposed, which makes the registration system difficult to implement. Based on the judicial practice, this paper investigates and inspects the implementation of the registration system in the administrative proceedings, and combines the theoretical knowledge with the essential connotation of the registration system and the reasons for its implementation. The implementation status and existing problems are analyzed comprehensively and systematically, and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into four parts. The first part clarifies the concept of the registration system of administrative proceedings, and expounds the connotation of the registration system by comparing it with the system of filing and examining. In the case of preliminary understanding of the registration system of our country, this paper compares the concept and essence of the extraterritorial registration system, and understands the registration system in the current administrative procedure law from both positive and negative aspects. This part explains the reasons for the first implementation of the registration system in the field of administrative litigation from four aspects: the increase of disputes in administrative litigation, the development of administrative right of action, the malpractice of filing and examining system, and the guidance of policy factors. It is put forward that the present registration system is not the real registration system, but the examination system. In the second part, through field visits, questionnaires, telephone interviews, and other forms of investigation and analysis of the investigation data of several courts, administrative organs and some administrative litigation counterparts in Ningbo, It is proved by chart that the cases of administrative litigation increase rapidly after the registration system is put into practice, and the types of cases show a trend of diversification. The third part, based on the second part, summarizes the three reasons for the existing problems in the current system from the current situation after the implementation of the registration system of administrative proceedings. The first reason is that there are defects in the legislation of the current registration system. It is pointed out that the legislation has no clear provisions on the contents of the examination of the administrative indictment, and there are problems such as the lack of distinction between the elements of prosecution and the elements of litigation, and the unclear supervision over the non-filing of the case. The second reason is the lack of administrative overappeal regulation procedure. The third reason is the lack of court power. It is because of these factors that the registration system is difficult to implement. The fourth part aims at the above problems based on the national conditions, combined with the extraterritorial legislation, judicial experience, proposed to distinguish the elements of prosecution from the elements of litigation, to clarify the content of administrative proceedings registration system review, to regulate the administrative overappeal. Carry out the administrative litigation mediation system, strengthen the administrative trial force and other measures to implement the registration system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈巋;;信息公開申請(qǐng)和訴訟濫用的司法應(yīng)對(duì)——評(píng)“陸紅霞訴南通市發(fā)改委案”[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2016年05期

2 李培磊;;2014—2015年行政訴訟制度改革——以《行政訴訟法》修改和實(shí)施為中心[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年02期

3 王春業(yè);;論行政訴訟的登記立案制度——兼評(píng)新行政訴訟法相關(guān)條款[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年11期

4 熊黎;;論行政訴訟中的調(diào)解[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年10期

5 范志勇;;立案登記制下的行政訴訟原告資格[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年08期

6 段文波;;起訴程序的理論基礎(chǔ)與制度前景[J];中外法學(xué);2015年04期

7 張衛(wèi)平;;民事案件受理制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法商研究;2015年03期

8 張文忠;;新《行政訴訟法》實(shí)施與法院立案登記制度[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2015年03期

9 姜峰;;法院“案多人少”與國家治道變革——轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期中國的政治與司法憂思[J];政法論壇;2015年02期

10 傅郁林;;再論民事訴訟立案程序的功能與結(jié)構(gòu)[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1875404