本文選題：民事訴訟 + 民事訴訟法律關(guān)系��； 參考：《對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟程序?qū)用娴膯栴}往往都會(huì)最終指向?qū)嶓w法領(lǐng)域，離開訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的基礎(chǔ)去談訴訟程序制度的設(shè)計(jì)是站不住腳的。在明確訴訟主體角色定位、訴訟主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)分配、訴訟程序如何推進(jìn)和發(fā)展、案件事實(shí)真相的發(fā)現(xiàn)、法官如何形成內(nèi)心的確信以及訴訟程序如何安排的重要問題都需要從以法官與當(dāng)事人、當(dāng)事人之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)分配為內(nèi)容的訴訟法律關(guān)系理論問題抓起。 本文從第二章開始對(duì)作為法學(xué)方法的法律關(guān)系理論進(jìn)行分析。然后是民事訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的緣起與發(fā)展。第一，介紹民事訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的產(chǎn)生，引出民事訴訟法律關(guān)系的概念和不同學(xué)說的不同含義，進(jìn)而介紹民事訴訟法律關(guān)系的內(nèi)涵；第二，對(duì)民事訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的發(fā)展進(jìn)行總體概述，突出介紹國(guó)新民事訴訟法下對(duì)訴訟法律關(guān)系的理解；第三，說明民事訴訟程序與民事訴訟法律關(guān)系的相互影響，主要包括：民事訴訟程序?qū)γ袷略V訟法律關(guān)系的決定性，民事訴訟法律關(guān)系對(duì)民事訴訟程序繁簡(jiǎn)的影響和民事訴訟法律關(guān)系對(duì)訴訟程序的描述作用。 第三章是現(xiàn)代民事訴訟法律關(guān)系的抽象——合作主義訴訟模式。第一，先介紹民事訴訟模式的含義和基本類型；第二，合作主義訴訟模式產(chǎn)生的歷史背景和基本內(nèi)容作出說明，再同其他訴訟模式相對(duì)比，尋找合作主義模式的特點(diǎn)和與其他模式的理論聯(lián)系，主要體現(xiàn)在合作主義與辯論主義，基礎(chǔ)性權(quán)利的訴權(quán)與審判權(quán)，訴訟主體之間的對(duì)抗與協(xié)作方面；第三，與介紹與合作主義訴訟模式相匹配的理論和制度；第四，，對(duì)合作主義訴訟模式的成效進(jìn)行評(píng)析。 第四章是合作主義模式對(duì)民事訴訟法律關(guān)系的滲透。主要是從宏觀的角度對(duì)合作主義模式下當(dāng)事人與法官的權(quán)利和義務(wù)進(jìn)行探討。首先，對(duì)新訴訟模式下法官角色的轉(zhuǎn)換及其理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行說明，包括：法官監(jiān)督能夠保證訴訟程序的公平進(jìn)行，法官對(duì)案件進(jìn)行積極管理的體現(xiàn)，法官程序性職權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)；其次，說明合作主義模式如何對(duì)當(dāng)事人訴訟權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行再調(diào)整，主要從辯論主義與當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)的角度展開，研究合作主義模式如何構(gòu)建當(dāng)事人訴訟程序下的權(quán)利和義務(wù)；第三，對(duì)合作主義模式下法律關(guān)系的理想狀態(tài)進(jìn)行概括性的說明。 第五章是合作主義訴訟模式中的法官與當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系。主要通過比較法的研究方法，對(duì)不同訴訟程序中法官與當(dāng)事人之間的訴訟活動(dòng)和訴訟權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行研究，可以分為三個(gè)部分：第一，審理前階段法官與當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系；第二，審理中法官與當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系。包括法官對(duì)訴訟程序的指揮和當(dāng)事人推進(jìn)訴訟的義務(wù)及訴訟責(zé)任；第三，訴訟和解（調(diào)解）中的法官與當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系。 第六章是合作主義訴訟模式中的當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系。也可以分成四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行介紹：第一，當(dāng)事人合作的理論分析；第二，審理前階段當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系，主要是訴答程序中當(dāng)事人主張?zhí)岢龊褪占C據(jù)的合作，以及我國(guó)訴答程序的完善；第三，審理中當(dāng)事人之間的關(guān)系；第四，和解（調(diào)解）的強(qiáng)制。
[Abstract]:The problems in the procedural aspects of civil proceedings tend to point to the substantive law field , and the basis of leaving the theory of legal relation of litigation is not tenable . In the course of clarifying the role orientation of the litigation subject , the distribution of the rights and obligations of the subject , how the procedure is pushed forward and developed , the fact that the facts of the case facts are found , how the judge forms the inner conviction and how to arrange the proceedings need to be grasped from the theoretical question of the legal relationship between the judge and the parties and the parties , the rights and obligations of the parties .

This paper begins with the analysis of the theory of legal relation as a legal method from the second chapter . Then it is the origin and development of the theory of the legal relation of civil litigation . Firstly , the author introduces the generation of the theory of the legal relation of civil litigation , draws out the concept of the legal relation of civil litigation and the different meanings of the different theories , and then introduces the connotation of the legal relation of civil litigation .
Second , an overview of the development of the theory of civil action legal relations , highlighting the understanding of the legal relationship of litigation under the new civil procedure law of the State ;
Thirdly , it illustrates the mutual influence of civil litigation procedure and the legal relation of civil litigation , which mainly includes the decisive effect of civil action procedure on the legal relation of civil litigation , the influence of civil litigation legal relation on the complicated civil procedure and the description of the legal relation of civil litigation .

The third chapter is the abstract _ cooperative litigation pattern of the legal relation of modern civil litigation . First , the meaning and basic type of civil action model are introduced first .
Second , the historical background and the basic contents of the cooperative litigation pattern are explained , then compared with other modes of action , the characteristics of the cooperative mode and the theoretical connection with other modes are found .
Thirdly , with the introduction of the theory and system matching the cooperative litigation pattern ;
Fourthly , we analyze the effectiveness of cooperative litigation model .

The fourth chapter is the penetration of the cooperative mode on the legal relations of civil litigation . It mainly discusses the rights and obligations of the parties and judges in the cooperative mode from the macro perspective . First , the conversion of the judge ' s role in the new litigation mode and its theoretical basis will be described .
Secondly , the author explains how to adjust the rights and obligations of the parties in the cooperative mode , mainly from the angle of debate doctrine and the party ' s right to litigation , and to study how cooperative mode can construct the rights and obligations under the parties ' litigation procedure ;
Thirdly , an overview of the ideal state of the legal relationship in the cooperative mode is described .

The fifth chapter is the relationship between the judge and the party in the cooperative litigation mode . Through the comparative law research method , the lawsuit activities and the litigation rights and obligations between the judge and the parties in different proceedings are studied , which can be divided into three parts : the first , the relation between the judge and the parties before the trial ;
Second , the relationship between the judge and the party in the trial , including the command of the judge to the procedure and the obligation of the party to advance the lawsuit and the litigation responsibility ;
Third , the relationship between the judges and the parties in the settlement of the proceedings ( mediation ) .

The sixth chapter is the relationship between the parties in the cooperative litigation mode . It can also be divided into four parts : the first , the party cooperation theory analysis ;
Secondly , the relationship between the parties in the pre - trial stage is mainly the cooperation between the parties in the prosecution procedure and the collection of evidence , as well as the perfection of China ' s v . A procedure .
Third , the relationship between the parties in the trial ;
Fourth , the enforcement of reconciliation ( mediation ) .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D915.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 柯陽(yáng)友,吳英旗;民事訴訟當(dāng)事人真實(shí)義務(wù)研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

2 張祥龍;;民事訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的困惑及其消解[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

3 韓波;;民事訴訟模式論:爭(zhēng)鳴與選擇[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年05期

4 湯維建;;論民事訴訟法修改的指導(dǎo)理念[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年06期

5 戴素君;;法院訴訟指揮權(quán)的價(jià)值分析及制度構(gòu)建[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

6 冀宗儒;;從英美法官對(duì)案件的管理看民事程序的變化[J];國(guó)際商務(wù).對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 楊柳青;;民事訴訟法律關(guān)系理論的三個(gè)缺陷[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

8 李立新;;訴訟和解與訴訟調(diào)解制度辨析[J];法律適用;2008年06期

9 江偉;劉榮軍;;民事訴訟中當(dāng)事人與法院的作用分擔(dān)──兼論民事訴訟模式[J];法學(xué)家;1999年03期

10 李祖軍;民事訴訟答辯狀規(guī)則研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年04期

本文編號(hào)：1870822