本文選題：變更罪名 + 變更模式　； 參考：《法商研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：人民法院能否變更起訴罪名在我國(guó)刑事訴訟法學(xué)界頗具爭(zhēng)議�，F(xiàn)階段,"以審判為中心"的訴訟制度改革以及認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度改革等司法改革措施正在逐步展開,使得人民法院變更起訴罪名又出現(xiàn)新的問(wèn)題。以司法實(shí)務(wù)中的具體樣態(tài)為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),人民法院變更起訴罪名的模式可分為"由重罪轉(zhuǎn)輕罪"、"由輕罪轉(zhuǎn)重罪"以及"平行變更"3種。對(duì)人民法院變更起訴罪名行為的法律規(guī)制也應(yīng)當(dāng)在不同的變更模式下從實(shí)體法與程序法兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行研討,應(yīng)正確適用罪數(shù)區(qū)分理論,充分貫徹罪刑法定原則、控審分離原則與辯護(hù)權(quán)保障原則。為了增強(qiáng)法律規(guī)制的實(shí)效,應(yīng)當(dāng)完善刑事立法,科學(xué)設(shè)置罪名,增加"起訴罪名不成立"判決無(wú)罪、明確規(guī)定人民法院變更起訴罪名的具體形式、細(xì)化保障辯護(hù)權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:Whether the people's court can change the charge of prosecution is controversial in the field of criminal procedure law of our country. At present, the judicial reform measures, such as the reform of the lawsuit system centered on the trial and the reform of the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing, are being carried out step by step, which makes the people's court change the charge of prosecution and bring forth new problems. According to the concrete pattern of judicial practice, the pattern of people's court to change the charge of prosecution can be divided into three types: "from felony to misdemeanor", "from misdemeanor to felony" and "parallel alteration". The legal regulation of the people's court to change the charge of prosecution should also be studied from two aspects of substantive law and procedural law under different changing modes, and the theory of number differentiation of crime should be applied correctly, and the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime should be fully implemented. The principle of separation of charge and trial and the principle of safeguarding the right of defense. In order to enhance the effectiveness of legal regulation, we should perfect the criminal legislation, set up the charge scientifically, increase the acquittal of "not guilty of prosecution", clearly stipulate the specific form of the people's court to change the charge of prosecution, and refine the relevant provisions to protect the right to defense.
【作者單位】： 中央民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1866558