本文選題：民事訴訟 + 證據(jù)制度　； 參考：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任素有“民事訴訟的脊梁”之稱,德國學(xué)者羅森貝克(Rosenberg)認(rèn)為證明責(zé)任是通過分析實(shí)體法中法規(guī)范的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分配,法官無權(quán)對證明責(zé)任分配自由裁量。我國是成文法國家,由于法律的制定具有滯后性特征,新類型的案件可能會造成法官難以分配證明責(zé)任,嚴(yán)格按照法律要件分類說分配證明責(zé)任在一些特殊案件處理上可能會導(dǎo)致不公平的結(jié)果。大陸法系國家為了追求法律的穩(wěn)定性、可判性,在分配證明責(zé)任上采用法律要件分類說為主,利益衡量說為輔進(jìn)行操作,在特殊案件中一般允許法官在根據(jù)原、被告的舉證能力,并在誠實(shí)信用原則等前提下,自由裁量分配證明責(zé)任。新頒布的《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國民事訴訟法的解釋》(以下簡稱《民事訴訟法司法解釋》)中第91條,將法律要件分類說的觀點(diǎn)作為理論依據(jù),對證明責(zé)任分配規(guī)則形成成文解釋。本文以大陸法系基本證據(jù)理論,分析何為證明責(zé)任分配,在分配證明責(zé)任方面法官能否擁有自由裁量權(quán)及法官如何行使自由裁量權(quán)分配證明責(zé)任,并力求提出解決的初步方案。
[Abstract]:The burden of proof in civil action is known as "the backbone of civil action". Rosenberg, a German scholar, believes that the burden of proof is distributed by analyzing the logical structure of the norms of law in substantive law, and that the judge has no right to exercise discretion in the distribution of burden of proof. Our country is a statutory country, because the law making has the characteristic of lag, the new type of case may make it difficult for the judge to distribute the burden of proof. According to the strict classification of legal elements, the assignment of burden of proof may lead to unfair results in some special cases. In order to pursue the stability of the law and the justiciability of the civil law system, the countries of the civil law system adopt the classification theory of the legal elements mainly in the distribution of the burden of proof, and the theory of weighing the interests as the auxiliary operation. In special cases, judges are generally allowed to operate according to the original. The defendant's ability to prove, and the principle of good faith and other premises, discretionary distribution of the burden of proof. Article 91 of the newly promulgated interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Judicial interpretation of the Civil procedure Law) takes as the theoretical basis the viewpoint of classifying the legal elements. Form a written explanation of the rules of burden of proof. Based on the basic evidence theory of the continental law system, this paper analyzes what is the distribution of burden of proof, whether the judge can have the discretion to distribute the burden of proof and how to exercise the discretion to distribute the burden of proof, and tries to put forward a preliminary plan to solve the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李浩;;《民事訴訟法》修訂中的舉證責(zé)任問題[J];清華法學(xué);2011年03期

，

本文編號：1854100