天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 訴訟法論文 >

民事訴訟中的先行調(diào)解制度研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-06 18:34

  本文選題:先行調(diào)解 + 準(zhǔn)司法性; 參考:《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文


【摘要】:無論是從多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的發(fā)展背景,還是從具有緩解緊張的司法資源、保護(hù)爭訟外利益、減少當(dāng)事人訴訟對抗等價(jià)值和功能的角度上看,先行調(diào)解制度的適用都是具有較大優(yōu)勢的。我國新民事訴訟法第122條就是關(guān)于先行調(diào)解制度的規(guī)定。但是由于該規(guī)定概括性較強(qiáng),所以一定程度上造成了司法實(shí)踐中存在著尚不規(guī)范的做法。筆者試圖以民事訴訟法122條規(guī)定的先行調(diào)解為研究對象,對其含義和屬性、司法實(shí)踐情況、制度的適用等進(jìn)行分析探討。除引言和結(jié)語外,文章結(jié)構(gòu)分為四個(gè)部分。第一個(gè)部分從民訴法122條的先行調(diào)解的含義和屬性入手,通過分析與相關(guān)概念的異同,來明確先行調(diào)解的含義和性質(zhì)。文章第二部分闡述了美國、日本、我國臺灣地區(qū)與先行調(diào)解相類似的制度,主要分析了其制度的運(yùn)作及運(yùn)作特點(diǎn),總結(jié)了我國在先行調(diào)解制度的適用中可以借鑒的方面;另外筆者將我國現(xiàn)階段司法實(shí)踐中的先行調(diào)解分為三種模式,即立案調(diào)解中心的訴前模式、訴前委托調(diào)解模式和法院附設(shè)訴前調(diào)解模式,并對三種先行調(diào)解模式進(jìn)行了比較分析。文章第三部分是對先行調(diào)解制度在具體運(yùn)行中的問題進(jìn)行分析,主要包括調(diào)解和審判關(guān)系、矛盾解決和權(quán)利保護(hù)兩對內(nèi)在緊張關(guān)系和司法實(shí)踐中具體存在的問題。文章的第四部分從先行調(diào)解的基本原則、適用范圍、程序流程、激勵機(jī)制這些方面提出了筆者對于新民事訴訟法第122條的適用的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Not only from the perspective of the development background of diversified dispute resolution mechanism, but also from the perspective of its value and function, such as relieving the tension of judicial resources, protecting the interests outside litigation, reducing the litigants' litigation confrontation and so on. The application of the first mediation system has great advantages. Article 122 of the new Civil procedure Law of our country is the stipulation of the mediation system in advance. However, due to the strong generality of the provisions, to a certain extent, there are still some non-standard practices in judicial practice. The author tries to analyze the meaning and attribute of mediation in advance, judicial practice and the application of system, which is stipulated in Article 122 of the Civil procedure Law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the structure of the article is divided into four parts. The first part starts with the meaning and attribute of the first mediation in the 122 article of the Civil procedure Law, and clarifies the meaning and nature of the advance mediation by analyzing the similarities and differences with the related concepts. The second part of the article expounds the similar systems between the United States, Japan and Taiwan, mainly analyzes the operation and operation characteristics of the system, and summarizes the aspects that can be used for reference in the application of the system. In addition, the author divides the current judicial practice of our country into three modes, namely, the pre-litigation model of the mediation center, the pre-litigation entrustment mediation model and the pre-litigation mediation model attached to the court. In addition, three kinds of mediation modes are compared and analyzed. The third part of the article is to analyze the problems in the specific operation of the advance mediation system, mainly including mediation and trial relations, conflict resolution and protection of the rights of the two pairs of internal tension and the specific problems in judicial practice. The fourth part of the article puts forward the author's idea of the application of Article 122 of the new Civil procedure Law from the following aspects: the basic principle, the scope of application, the procedure flow and the incentive mechanism of the mediation in advance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘劍鋒;劉哲瑋;;論法院調(diào)解與糾紛解決之關(guān)系——從構(gòu)建和諧社會的角度展開[J];比較法研究;2010年04期

2 肖建華;唐玉富;;論法院調(diào)解保密原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

3 袁煜馳;;法院調(diào)解自愿原則新解[J];法律適用;2006年12期

4 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會責(zé)任 從司法社會化到司法能動主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

5 張華;趙可;;人民法院訴前調(diào)解制度的初步建構(gòu) 司法ADR模式訴前調(diào)解制度合理性、可操作性探究[J];法律適用;2007年11期

6 李浩;;委托調(diào)解若干問題研究——對四個(gè)基層人民法院委托調(diào)解的初步考察[J];法商研究;2008年01期

7 趙遠(yuǎn);;困境與出路:我國訴前調(diào)解制度改革論析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

8 許少波;;先行調(diào)解的三重含義[J];海峽法學(xué);2013年01期

9 趙鋼;;關(guān)于“先行調(diào)解”的幾個(gè)問題[J];法學(xué)評論;2013年03期

10 楊雅妮;;多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制下立案調(diào)解制度構(gòu)建的再思考[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年S1期

,

本文編號:1853407

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1853407.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶19411***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com