發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-24 13:29

  本文選題：口供的證明力 + 印證規(guī)則�。� 參考：《華北電力大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：口供是我國(guó)刑事訴訟領(lǐng)域的一項(xiàng)重要證據(jù),其證明效果的直接性相比于其他證據(jù)來(lái)講有著明顯的優(yōu)勢(shì),在司法審判工作中起著難以替代的作用�？诠┑淖C明力是指口供在案件審理過(guò)程中的可信程度以及證明效果。它主要依賴(lài)于口供內(nèi)容的真實(shí)程度,而真實(shí)程度的影響因素包括：口供的自愿性、穩(wěn)定性和印證度。 我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》及相關(guān)司法解釋從口供真實(shí)性的影響因素出發(fā),主要確立了兩大口供證明力規(guī)則。一是口供的印證規(guī)則,要求口供的內(nèi)容能夠與本案其他證據(jù)相互佐證,旨在根據(jù)口供的印證度來(lái)審查判斷具體口供的真實(shí)性；二是口供的補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則,要求被告人的口供不得成為有罪判決的唯一依據(jù),必須經(jīng)由其他證據(jù)對(duì)口供進(jìn)行補(bǔ)強(qiáng),也就是說(shuō)口供對(duì)案件事實(shí)不具有完全和獨(dú)立的證明力。除此之外,為了從源頭上保障口供的真實(shí)性,我國(guó)法律也對(duì)口供的獲取程序做出了相應(yīng)地規(guī)定,力圖通過(guò)對(duì)自愿性的保護(hù)來(lái)促進(jìn)口供的真實(shí)性。 這些規(guī)定在保障口供的真實(shí)性方面產(chǎn)生了較為明顯的效果,對(duì)辦案人員的司法實(shí)踐也起到了積極地指導(dǎo)作用。但其仍然存在著內(nèi)容不足與規(guī)定不完善的缺陷,這些缺陷在司法實(shí)踐中產(chǎn)生了許多問(wèn)題,甚至導(dǎo)致了冤假錯(cuò)案的屢禁不止。因而,本文將從口供證明力的基本理論出發(fā),結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)這些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行細(xì)致的分析。同時(shí),針對(duì)問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的原因,總結(jié)并論證出適合我國(guó)口供證明力規(guī)則完善和發(fā)展的建議。
[Abstract]:Confession is an important evidence in the field of criminal procedure in our country. Compared with other evidence, the direct effect of the evidence has obvious advantages and plays an irreplaceable role in the judicial work. The probative power of confession refers to the credibility and effect of confession in the course of trial. It mainly depends on the truth of the confession, and the factors influencing the truth include the voluntary, stability and corroboration of the confession. The Criminal procedure Law of our country and the related judicial explanation mainly establish two rules of testifying power according to the factors influencing the truth of confession. First, the corroboration rules of confessions, which require that the contents of confessions can be mutually corroborated with other evidence in this case, in order to examine and judge the authenticity of specific confessions according to the corroboration degree of confessions; and second, the rules on the reinforcement of confessions. The defendant's confession must not be the only basis for the conviction, but must be reinforced by other evidence, that is, the confession does not have a complete and independent evidentiary effect on the facts of the case. In addition, in order to guarantee the truth of confession from the source, the law of our country also makes the corresponding stipulation to the procedure of obtaining the confession, trying to promote the truth of the confession through the protection of the voluntary nature. These regulations have obvious effect in protecting the truth of confession, and also play a positive role in guiding the judicial practice of the case handling personnel. However, it still has the defects of insufficient content and imperfect regulations. These defects have caused many problems in judicial practice, and even led to repeated prohibition of false and wrong cases. Therefore, this article will proceed from the basic theory of testifying power, unifies the judicial practice experience, carries on the detailed analysis to these questions. At the same time, according to the causes of the problem, the author summarizes and demonstrates some suggestions for the perfection and development of the rules of testimonial power of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 譚勁松;我國(guó)口供補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則研究[J];法律適用;2003年05期

2 衛(wèi)躍寧;;無(wú)罪推定原則的確立與口供制度的完善[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2008年06期

3 陳瑞華;;論被告人口供規(guī)則[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

4 陳光中;鄭曦;;論刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)裁判原則——兼談《刑事訴訟法》修改中的若干問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2011年09期

5 孟桂芹;;刑事訴訟中對(duì)口供倚重的歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)的反思——兼談規(guī)制刑訊逼供的法制措施[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年32期

6 張閃閃;;“零口供”案件證據(jù)審查與證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)探究——以審查起訴環(huán)節(jié)為中心的分析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年10期

7 胡常龍,汪海燕;論共犯口供的性質(zhì)及其證明力[J];人民司法;2001年08期

8 趙旭光;王勇;;論口供的補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

9 趙旭光;王勇;;論口供的證明力[J];鐵道警官高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

10 林鐵軍;;論我國(guó)非法口供排除規(guī)則的再完善——以非法口供證明力的阻斷為視角[J];犯罪研究;2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1796836