本文選題：強(qiáng)奸罪 + 定案根據(jù)　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：強(qiáng)奸是指違背婦女意志，以暴力、脅迫或者其他手段，強(qiáng)行與其發(fā)生性交，或者同不滿(mǎn)14周歲的幼女發(fā)生性關(guān)系的行為。強(qiáng)奸行為侵犯了婦女性的不可侵犯性或者幼女的身心健康。張高平、張輝強(qiáng)奸案引發(fā)了大范圍的爭(zhēng)議。張高平、張輝強(qiáng)奸案共有兩大爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)：一是該案被告人是否構(gòu)成強(qiáng)奸罪，二是袁連芳的證言能否作為定案根據(jù)。對(duì)認(rèn)定張高平、張輝二人是否構(gòu)成犯罪，應(yīng)當(dāng)從強(qiáng)奸罪的客觀(guān)方面進(jìn)行分析。本案證明被告人存在強(qiáng)奸行為的主要證據(jù)即被告人的有罪供述，被告人的供述要成為定案根據(jù)則應(yīng)當(dāng)審查證據(jù)的合法性，對(duì)于口供合法性的認(rèn)定必須根據(jù)非法言詞證據(jù)排除規(guī)則來(lái)判斷�！缎淌略V訟法》中規(guī)定，由刑訊逼供等非法方法取得的被告人供述法院應(yīng)當(dāng)予以排除，不能作為定案根據(jù)。對(duì)認(rèn)定袁連芳的證言能否作為定案的證據(jù)，首先應(yīng)該從袁連芳的證言的證據(jù)能力來(lái)判斷，獄內(nèi)偵查是公安機(jī)關(guān)秘密偵查手段中的一種，特情人員所獲情報(bào)只能認(rèn)定為公安機(jī)關(guān)破案的線(xiàn)索，但是通過(guò)一定程序的轉(zhuǎn)化也能作為公開(kāi)證據(jù)使用。其次，，應(yīng)從袁連芳證言的證明力來(lái)分析，從證據(jù)的來(lái)源判斷袁連芳的證言屬于傳聞證據(jù)，同時(shí)綜合全案分析袁連芳的證言屬于孤證，孤證不能定案，因此，袁連芳的證言不能作為本案的定案根據(jù)。對(duì)該案爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的分析，能夠?qū)ξ覈?guó)刑事審判活動(dòng)中對(duì)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的理解和面對(duì)存在獄偵特情人員作證的案件處理方式起到幫助作用。
[Abstract]:Rape is an act of sexual intercourse against a woman's will, violence, coercion or other means, or sexual relations with a young girl under the age of 14. Rape violates the sexual inviolability of a woman or the physical and mental health of a young girl. The rape case of Gao Ping Zhang and Zhang Hui has caused a great deal of controversy. There are two controversial points in the rape case of Zhang Gao Ping and Zhang Hui: one is whether the defendant constitutes the crime of rape, the other is whether Yuan Lianfang's testimony can be taken as the basis of the final case. It is necessary to analyze whether Zhang Gao Ping and Zhang Hui constitute a crime from the objective aspects of the crime of rape. The case proves that the defendant has the main evidence of rape, that is, the defendant's guilty confession. In order for the defendant's confession to be conclusive, the legality of the evidence should be examined. The determination of the legality of confession must be judged according to the rule of exclusion of illegal verbal evidence. According to the Criminal procedure Law, the court of defendant's confession obtained by illegal means such as extorting confessions by torture should be excluded and can not be used as the basis of final decision. To determine whether Yuan Lianfang's testimony can be taken as final evidence, first of all, we should judge from Yuan Lianfang's evidentiary ability that the investigation in prison is one of the secret investigative techniques of the public security organs. The intelligence obtained by the special intelligence personnel can only be regarded as the clues of the public security organs to solve the case, but it can also be used as public evidence through the transformation of certain procedures. Secondly, it should be analyzed from the evidential power of Yuan Lianfang's testimony, judging from the source of the evidence that Yuan Lianfang's testimony belongs to hearsay evidence, and at the same time synthetically analyzing Yuan Lianfang's testimony belongs to solitary evidence. Yuan Lianfang's testimony could not be taken as the final basis of the case. The analysis of the controversial focus of the case can help the understanding of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in the criminal trial in our country and the way to deal with the cases in which the special persons of prison investigation give evidence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 陳興良;正當(dāng)化事由研究[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年03期

2 龍宗智;;聶樹(shù)斌案法理研判[J];法學(xué);2013年08期

3 徐克林;;獄偵特情:監(jiān)獄秘密偵查制度的理性回歸[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

4 縱博;王瑩;;“獄偵特情”所獲證據(jù)之規(guī)范使用[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年24期

5 周平;;技術(shù)偵查措施的內(nèi)涵與法律監(jiān)督[J];人民檢察;2012年13期

6 李學(xué)寬;論刑事訴訟中的非法證據(jù)[J];政法論壇;1995年02期

7 陳光中,張建偉;聯(lián)合國(guó)《公民權(quán)利和政治權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》與我國(guó)刑事訴訟[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1998年06期

8 陳光中;;刑事證據(jù)制度改革若干理論與實(shí)踐問(wèn)題之探討——以?xún)稍喝俊秲蓚�(gè)證據(jù)規(guī)定》之公布為視角[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年06期

本文編號(hào)：1779881