本文選題：股東派生訴訟 + 審判權(quán)��； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東派生訴訟是順應(yīng)現(xiàn)代公司發(fā)展,保護公司和小股東利益,減少公司代理成本的重要手段。該制度在我國的發(fā)展處于起步階段,法律的規(guī)定少,可操作性差。之前學(xué)界的研究主要集中在具體制度的構(gòu)建方面,但由于立法的滯后性,這些研究尚不能解決法院在具體案件審判上的困惑。本文主要從法院審判權(quán)的角度出發(fā),深入探討股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的相關(guān)理論及具體內(nèi)容,試圖為我國法院審理該類訴訟提供可供參考的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。全文共分為引言、正文、結(jié)語三部分,正文內(nèi)容分為五章。 第一章是股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的理論解釋。本部分主要運用學(xué)術(shù)理論說明股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的正當(dāng)性以及權(quán)力基礎(chǔ)。包括大陸法系相關(guān)實體法和程序法理論,英美法系的公司民主理論、私人檢察官理論,法經(jīng)濟學(xué)的代理成本理論、博弈理論。 第二章是股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的主體。本部分主要討論管轄法院和審判組織構(gòu)成,關(guān)于前者,筆者認(rèn)為宜采取由公司所在地法院管轄實行專屬管轄。關(guān)于后者,筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)以合議制為宜,不宜采獨任制。 第三章是股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的客體。本節(jié)一是討論派生訴訟的案件范圍,即哪些主體的什么行為可以作為派生訴訟的受案范圍。二是股東派生訴訟司法審判與仲裁的關(guān)系。 第四章是股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)的內(nèi)容。本章在總結(jié)訴訟法學(xué)界研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,將法院在股東派生訴訟中的民事審判權(quán)分為程序指揮權(quán)、實體裁判權(quán)和對當(dāng)事人處分行為的干預(yù)權(quán),分別加以論述。 第五章是股東派生訴訟審判權(quán)行使的基本原則。筆者認(rèn)為法院在審理此類案件時應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循依法行使的原則、公司內(nèi)部機構(gòu)先行處理原則、依申請和依職權(quán)相結(jié)合的原則、司法謙抑的原則四個原則。
[Abstract]:Shareholder derivative litigation is an important means to comply with the development of modern companies, to protect the interests of companies and minority shareholders, and to reduce the agency costs of companies.The development of the system in China is in its infancy, the legal provisions are few and the operability is poor.Previous academic research mainly focused on the construction of specific systems, but due to the lag of legislation, these studies can not solve the court in the specific case trial confusion.From the angle of court jurisdiction, this paper probes into the relevant theories and specific contents of shareholder derivative litigation, and tries to provide a reference standard for our courts to hear such cases.The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, and the text is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the theoretical explanation of shareholder derivative litigation.This part mainly uses academic theory to explain the legitimacy and power basis of shareholder derivative litigation.It includes relevant substantive law and procedural law theory in civil law system, corporate democracy theory in common law system, private prosecutor theory, agency cost theory in law and economics, and game theory.The second chapter is the main body of shareholder derivative litigation.This part mainly discusses the constitution of jurisdiction court and trial organization. As for the former, the author thinks that it is appropriate to adopt exclusive jurisdiction by the jurisdiction of the court where the company is located.As for the latter, the author thinks that the collegial system should be taken as the appropriate system, and the system of single appointment should not be adopted.The third chapter is the object of shareholder derivative litigation.In this section, we discuss the scope of derivative actions, that is, which subjects' actions can be taken as the scope of derivative actions.Second, the relationship between the judicial trial of shareholder derivative litigation and arbitration.The fourth chapter is the content of shareholder derivative litigation.On the basis of summarizing the research results in the field of procedural law, the civil jurisdiction of the court in the shareholder derivative action is divided into procedural command power, substantive adjudication power and interference right to the party's disciplinary action, which are discussed separately in this chapter.The fifth chapter is the basic principle of shareholder derivative litigation.The author thinks that the court should follow the principle of exercising according to law, the principle of dealing with the company's internal organization in advance, the principle of combining the application with the authority, the principle of judicial modesty and the four principles of judicial modesty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291.91;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 甘培忠;有限責(zé)任公司小股東利益保護的法學(xué)思考——從訴訟視角考察[J];法商研究;2002年06期

2 胡濱,曹順明;股東派生訴訟的合理性基礎(chǔ)與制度設(shè)計[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

3 蔡元慶;;股東代表訴訟中公司的地位和作用 以美國特別訴訟委員會制度為中心[J];中外法學(xué);2006年04期

4 趙萬一;趙信會;;我國股東代表訴訟制度建立的法理基礎(chǔ)和基本思路[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年03期

5 劉凱湘;;股東代表訴訟的司法適用與立法完善——以《公司法》第152條的解釋為中心[J];中國法學(xué);2008年04期

6 江偉,段厚省;論股東訴權(quán)[J];浙江社會科學(xué);1999年03期

，

本文編號：1763978