本文選題：緊急仲裁員　切入點：臨時措施　出處：《北京外國語大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：緊急仲裁員制度作為商事仲裁臨時措施的重要創(chuàng)新,相繼納入世界主要仲裁機構(gòu)的仲裁規(guī)則。部分在國際仲裁領(lǐng)域居于領(lǐng)先地位的國家（地區(qū)）,通過立法的形式對緊急仲裁員所作裁決或決定的效力予以確認,并對該裁決或決定的執(zhí)行模式進行安排。在此背景下,我國主要仲裁機構(gòu)在最近的仲裁規(guī)則修訂中,加入了緊急仲裁員制度,主要為方便當事人在支持緊急仲裁員制度的執(zhí)行地獲得臨時措施救濟。與之相對,緊急仲裁員制度在中國大陸的效力及執(zhí)行問題,在立法層面的規(guī)制尚付闕如。為了賦予仲裁當事人在中國大陸利用緊急仲裁員制度有效救濟的權(quán)利,構(gòu)建合理運行的緊急仲裁員機制,我國的民事訴訟法及仲裁法需要相應(yīng)作出調(diào)整。 在此過程中,如何借鑒世界主要仲裁機構(gòu)的先進理念,合理安排緊急仲裁員程序的制度細節(jié),并結(jié)合我國仲裁領(lǐng)域特有的司法政策及司法理念,提出具有可行性的建議,構(gòu)成了本文關(guān)注的研究方向與主要內(nèi)容。為滿足上述研究目的,本文綜合考量仲裁的特性、仲裁當事人的權(quán)利保護、仲裁成本等多重因素,采用比較法和案例分析法,對可行性立法建議進行論證,主要分以下四個章節(jié)： 第一章主要是商事仲裁中緊急仲裁員制度概覽。簡要介紹緊急仲裁員制度的發(fā)展歷程,及其在世界主要仲裁機構(gòu)的適用情況,以及與傳統(tǒng)臨時措施相比的優(yōu)勢及弊端,為后文分析并提出立法建議提供背景。 第二章介紹了我國商事仲裁臨時措施的立法及司法現(xiàn)狀。從時間節(jié)點上可分為仲裁前臨時措施與仲裁中臨時措施,法律依據(jù)方面包括2012年新修訂的《民事訴訟法》及《仲裁法》,并結(jié)合相關(guān)案例對司法實踐進行評析。主要關(guān)注現(xiàn)行仲裁臨時措施在緊急仲裁員制度構(gòu)建中的局限性。其中將仲裁臨時措施按時間點劃分并獨立分析的角度為本文的創(chuàng)新之處。 第三章分析我國仲裁規(guī)則中關(guān)于緊急仲裁員制度的新發(fā)展。一方面肯定其制度創(chuàng)新的先進性,一方面關(guān)注該規(guī)則項下的緊急仲裁員制度的適用范圍,指出該仲裁規(guī)則由于缺少立法層面的支持,對在大陸構(gòu)建緊急仲裁員制度的貢獻十分有限,強調(diào)通過修訂法律構(gòu)建緊急仲裁員制度的緊迫性及必要性。 第四章主要是構(gòu)建我國商事仲裁中緊急仲裁員制度的具體建議。先從我國仲裁領(lǐng)域特有的司法理念入手,強調(diào)緊急仲裁員制度構(gòu)建的過程中需要因地制宜。進而在借鑒世界主要仲裁機構(gòu)的先進理念,通過比較法和案例分析法,從適用方式、決策程序、發(fā)布主體、執(zhí)行模式層面給出具體建議。其中,結(jié)合我國仲裁領(lǐng)域特有司法理念進行立法建議選擇的角度和方法,為本文的創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:Emergency arbitrators system as an important innovation of interim measures of commercial arbitration, One after another into the arbitration rules of the world's leading arbitration institutions. Some of the countries (regions) that are leading in the field of international arbitration confirm, by way of legislation, the validity of awards or decisions made by emergency arbitrators, In this context, the major arbitration institutions in our country have added the system of emergency arbitrators in the recent revision of the arbitration rules. The main purpose is to facilitate the parties to obtain interim measures relief in support of the enforcement of the emergency arbitrators system. In contrast, the effectiveness and enforcement of the emergency arbitrator system in the mainland of China, In order to give the arbitration parties the right to use the emergency arbitrators system to remedy effectively in mainland China, the system of emergency arbitrators should be constructed. The civil procedure law and arbitration law of our country need to be adjusted accordingly. In this process, how to draw lessons from the advanced ideas of the world's major arbitration institutions, reasonably arrange the system details of the emergency arbitrators' procedure, and combine with the judicial policy and judicial idea of our country's arbitration field, put forward some feasible suggestions. In order to satisfy the above research purpose, this paper synthetically considers the characteristics of arbitration, the protection of the rights of the arbitration parties, the arbitration cost and so on, and adopts the comparative method and the case analysis method. The feasibility of legislative proposals for demonstration, mainly divided into the following four chapters:. The first chapter is an overview of the emergency arbitrators system in commercial arbitration. It briefly introduces the development of the emergency arbitrators system and its application in the world's major arbitration institutions, as well as the advantages and disadvantages compared with the traditional interim measures. To provide the background for the following analysis and legislative proposals. The second chapter introduces the legislative and judicial status of the interim measures of commercial arbitration in China, which can be divided into pre-arbitration interim measures and interim measures in arbitration from the point of view of time. The legal basis includes the newly revised Civil procedure Law and the Arbitration Law in 2012, and analyzes the judicial practice in light of relevant cases. It mainly focuses on the limitations of the current interim measures of arbitration in the construction of the emergency arbitrators system. The innovation of this paper is to divide the interim measures into time points and analyze them independently. The third chapter analyzes the new development of the emergency arbitrators system in China's arbitration rules. On the one hand, it affirms the advanced nature of its system innovation, on the other hand, it pays close attention to the scope of application of the emergency arbitrators system under the rules. It is pointed out that due to the lack of legislative support, the arbitration rules have limited contribution to the construction of the emergency arbitrators system in mainland China, and the urgency and necessity of establishing the emergency arbitrators system through the revision of the law are emphasized. The fourth chapter is the construction of China's commercial arbitration in the system of emergency arbitrators specific recommendations. First of all, starting with the unique judicial concept in the field of arbitration in China. Emphasizing the need to adapt measures to local conditions in the process of constructing the emergency arbitrators system. Then, through comparative law and case analysis, we can learn from the advanced ideas of major arbitration institutions in the world, and issue the subject from the applicable mode, the decision-making procedure, and the main body. The specific suggestions are given at the level of execution mode, among which, the angle and method of legislative suggestion selection combined with the unique judicial concept in the field of arbitration in our country are the innovations of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 顏海燕;;國際商事仲裁臨時措施制度及我國相關(guān)制度的完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2011年02期

2 張科;;仲裁裁決若干問題思考——以當事人意思自治原則為視角[J];法制與社會;2012年25期

3 袁杜娟;;上海自貿(mào)區(qū)仲裁糾紛解決機制的探索與創(chuàng)新[J];法學(xué);2014年09期

4 芮安牟;陳宛寧;張然;;邁向有競爭力和符合成本效益的爭議解決制度[J];北京仲裁;2013年04期

5 房沫;;仲裁庭組成前的臨時救濟措施——以新加坡國際仲裁中心仲裁規(guī)則為視角[J];社會科學(xué)家;2013年06期

，

本文編號：1680296