本文選題：已決犯　切入點(diǎn)：逮捕　出處：《中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：對(duì)于已決犯再犯新罪或發(fā)現(xiàn)漏罪訴訟程序的論述在刑事理論中并不多見(jiàn)，尤其是當(dāng)已決犯兼具犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和罪犯等多重身份時(shí),探討如何啟動(dòng)追究其新罪或者漏罪的刑事責(zé)任的訴訟程序少之甚少。司法實(shí)踐中無(wú)論是訴訟程序的選取還是量刑的具體適用，歸根結(jié)底有必要明確區(qū)分當(dāng)事人的具體身份和所處的訴訟階段，如不進(jìn)行節(jié)點(diǎn)區(qū)分，將會(huì)引起偵查辦案期間、羈押期間、審理期限無(wú)法明確以及刑期無(wú)法科學(xué)、合理計(jì)算，訴訟權(quán)利無(wú)法保障等現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。本文以“已決犯”為切入點(diǎn)，，分三部分展開(kāi)論述：第一部分通過(guò)對(duì)“三個(gè)問(wèn)題”的思考引出“服刑中止”制度存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求和價(jià)值意義；第二部分“服刑中止”制度的審視與提出，論證了該制度的必要性和合理性；第三部分詳細(xì)論述了“服刑中止”制度的具體構(gòu)建和程序設(shè)置。文章根據(jù)最高院“三五改革綱要”的關(guān)于建立健全貫徹寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策的司法協(xié)調(diào)制度與保障制度的精神，本著實(shí)體與程序并重的理念和保障人權(quán)的需要，層層遞進(jìn)，逐步延伸，構(gòu)建了較為全面的“服刑中止”這一全新的司法制度。即在堅(jiān)持刑罰的強(qiáng)制性、嚴(yán)厲性的前提下，承認(rèn)刑罰執(zhí)行過(guò)程的客觀性、復(fù)雜性和漸進(jìn)性，通過(guò)必要時(shí)中止正在進(jìn)行的刑罰，留待將來(lái)中止條件消失后繼續(xù)進(jìn)行這一制度設(shè)計(jì)，來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)法律精神和客觀需要的契合和互補(bǔ)。這樣不僅能清楚區(qū)分服刑期間、偵查辦案期間、羈押期間、訴訟期間，還能為法官刑期清晰的計(jì)算提供方便，保障了程序正義和實(shí)體正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)，維護(hù)了被告人的合法權(quán)利，也體現(xiàn)了訴訟的經(jīng)濟(jì)原則，同時(shí)對(duì)于彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有刑罰執(zhí)行制度的短板亦大有裨益，為刑事訴訟的修改提供一個(gè)新的視野。
[Abstract]:It is rare in criminal theory to discuss the procedure for a convicted offender to repeat a new crime or to discover a missing crime, especially when a convicted offender has multiple identities such as suspect, defendant and criminal, etc. How to start the criminal responsibility for new crimes or omissions is very few. In judicial practice, whether the selection of litigation procedures or the specific application of sentencing, In the final analysis, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the specific identity of the parties and the litigation stage. If no distinction is made between the nodes, it will lead to the investigation and handling of cases, the detention period, the uncertainty of the trial period, and the lack of scientific and reasonable calculation of the term of the sentence. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part leads to the realistic demand and value meaning of the system of "suspension of sentence" through the consideration of "three issues"; The second part examines and puts forward the system of "sentence suspension", and proves the necessity and rationality of the system. The third part discusses the concrete construction and procedure setup of "sentence suspension" system in detail. According to the spirit of establishing and perfecting judicial coordination system and guarantee system of carrying out the criminal policy of leniency and severe punishment in the "three five year Reform outline" of the Supreme Court, In line with the concept of equal emphasis between entity and procedure and the need to protect human rights, the new judicial system of "suspension of sentence", which is a relatively comprehensive judicial system, has been constructed step by step and gradually extended, that is, under the premise of insisting on the mandatory and severe nature of punishment, Recognizing the objectivity, complexity and progressiveness of the process of execution of penalties, by suspending ongoing penalties, if necessary, and leaving the design of the system to continue after the conditions of suspension have disappeared in the future, To realize the compatibility and complementarity between the legal spirit and the objective needs. In this way, not only can we clearly distinguish between the period of serving a sentence, the period of investigation, the period of custody, the period of litigation, but also provide convenience for the judge to calculate his sentence clearly. It not only guarantees the realization of procedural justice and substantive justice, maintains the legal rights of defendants, but also embodies the economic principle of litigation. To provide a new perspective for the revision of criminal proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭學(xué)勤;;試論我國(guó)罰金刑的執(zhí)行[J];閩江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

2 于志剛;;關(guān)于“刑罰執(zhí)行完畢”之內(nèi)涵的思考——以累犯與數(shù)罪并罰制度的適用為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年07期

3 萬(wàn)毅;;刑事執(zhí)行制度之檢討與改造[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

4 張琪;;服刑期間發(fā)現(xiàn)漏罪后的程序性問(wèn)題思考[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

5 焦勇;;對(duì)我國(guó)緩刑制度有關(guān)問(wèn)題的探析[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

6 劉湘蓉;;我國(guó)緩刑考察制度的應(yīng)然設(shè)計(jì)[J];湖南人文科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

7 鞠正芳;;完善罰金刑執(zhí)行制度的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];社會(huì)工作;2007年03期

8 矯春曉,秦秀春;論財(cái)產(chǎn)刑適用中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];山東審判;2001年03期

9 高貴君;王勇;吳光俠;;《關(guān)于在執(zhí)行附加刑剝奪政治權(quán)利期間犯新罪應(yīng)如何處理的批復(fù)》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2009年13期

10 蔡國(guó)芹;趙增田;;暫予監(jiān)外執(zhí)行制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境及其出路[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2011年03期

本文編號(hào)：1650252