本文選題：第三人　切入點(diǎn)：類型劃分　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟第三人類型劃分的研究?jī)?nèi)容主要包含兩方面：一是民事訴訟第三人應(yīng)當(dāng)分為哪些種類；二是不同類型第三人的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第三人的類型劃分與第三人的參訴依據(jù)、訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)、各訴訟主體之間的關(guān)系、判決形式和效力等內(nèi)容密切相關(guān)，可以說(shuō)是第三人制度研究中的核心問(wèn)題。 本文通過(guò)四個(gè)部分對(duì)第三人類型的重新劃分進(jìn)行探究。 第一部分是對(duì)我國(guó)第三人制度演進(jìn)及現(xiàn)狀的介紹。該部分勾畫(huà)了我國(guó)民事訴訟第三人制度的發(fā)展歷程，并通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)存爭(zhēng)議的概括說(shuō)明了我國(guó)先行民事訴訟制度所面臨的困難處境，由于制度整體缺乏內(nèi)在思路的完整性，，不能為第三人制度的研究提供任何既定的依據(jù)，故對(duì)第三人類型進(jìn)行重新劃分有十分的必要性。 第二部分是對(duì)國(guó)外第三人制度立法例的介紹。該部分包含了前蘇聯(lián)、德國(guó)、日本、美國(guó)四個(gè)國(guó)家的第三人制度概述，并點(diǎn)明了各國(guó)制度對(duì)本文研究的啟示。 第三部分是對(duì)現(xiàn)有的第三人制度重構(gòu)方案的介紹及其評(píng)價(jià)。該部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹了我國(guó)學(xué)界現(xiàn)存的四種代表性重構(gòu)方案，并在宏觀上指出了各方案共有的三種缺陷，為本文研究提供了基本思路和價(jià)值指導(dǎo)，即第三人制度之重構(gòu)應(yīng)當(dāng)從制度價(jià)值的探討出發(fā)從整體上進(jìn)行。 第四部分闡述了以合一確定為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)第三人類型進(jìn)行的重新劃分。此部也是文章的主體部分，主要內(nèi)容有第三人的類型劃分模式、分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、合一確定的內(nèi)涵和三種具體情形，并通過(guò)對(duì)有獨(dú)立當(dāng)事人地位第三人參訴的五個(gè)具體程序問(wèn)題的闡釋對(duì)本文論題做了進(jìn)一步展開(kāi)。 本文通過(guò)以上四部分，在對(duì)現(xiàn)行第三人制度及相關(guān)學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行批評(píng)的基礎(chǔ)上，以我國(guó)所采用的規(guī)范出發(fā)型民事訴訟模式為立足點(diǎn)，通過(guò)對(duì)第三人制度獨(dú)立價(jià)值的探討得出了具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的第三人類型劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，為第三人制度的研究提供了全新的思路。
[Abstract]:The research contents of the classification of the third party in civil action mainly include two aspects: the first is the classification of the third party in the civil action, the second is the standard of the classification of the third party of different types, the classification of the third party and the basis of the third party's pleading. The structure of litigation, the relationship between the subjects of litigation, the form and effect of judgment are closely related, which can be said to be the core issues in the study of the third party system. This paper probes into the re-division of the third-party type in four parts. The first part is an introduction to the evolution and present situation of the third party system in China, which outlines the development course of the third party system in civil litigation in China. And through the summary of the existing disputes, it explains the difficult situation that our country's first civil action system faces. Because the system lacks the integrity of the internal thinking, it can not provide any established basis for the study of the third party system. Therefore, it is necessary to reclassify the third party type. The second part is an introduction to the legislation of the third party system in foreign countries. This part contains an overview of the third party system of the former Soviet Union, Germany, Japan and the United States, and points out the enlightenment of the systems of various countries to the study of this paper. The third part is the introduction and evaluation of the existing third party system reconstruction scheme. This part briefly introduces the existing four representative reconstruction schemes in Chinese academic circles, and points out three common defects in each scheme. It provides the basic thinking and value guidance for this study, that is, the reconstruction of the third party system should be carried out from the perspective of the system value. Part 4th expounds the redivision of the third party type with the criterion of unity determination. This part is also the main part of the article, which mainly includes the classification mode and classification standard of the third party. The connotation and three kinds of concrete circumstances of unified determination, and through the interpretation of the five specific procedural issues of independent party status, the third ginseng litigation, this paper makes a further development of the topic. Through the above four parts, on the basis of criticizing the current third party system and related theories, this paper bases on the standardised civil litigation mode adopted in our country. Through the discussion of the independent value of the third party system, the author obtains the original criteria for the classification of the third party type, and provides a new way of thinking for the study of the third party system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 張晉紅;論無(wú)獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)的第三人[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1986年03期

2 王青方;無(wú)獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)第三人參訴方式之我見(jiàn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年04期

3 孟濤,房國(guó)賓;論有獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)第三人之訴[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年S1期

4 張培;;論我國(guó)有獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)第三人制度的完善[J];司法改革論評(píng);2010年00期

5 宋振玲;無(wú)獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)的第三人制度之比較研究[J];沈陽(yáng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

6 趙信會(huì),李祖軍;無(wú)獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)第三人制度的內(nèi)部沖突與制衡[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年06期

本文編號(hào)：1565019