本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事惡意訴訟 識(shí)別 證據(jù)　出處：《沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：民事惡意訴訟是一種在訴訟中損害國(guó)家、集體和個(gè)人利益的行為。近年來有愈演愈烈的趨勢(shì)，這種行為擾亂了正常的司法秩序，把正當(dāng)合法的訴訟行為當(dāng)做侵害他人利益的工具。民事惡意訴訟現(xiàn)象的猖獗和危害性應(yīng)該引起我們的重視，我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律卻無法對(duì)其進(jìn)行有力的規(guī)避，這樣便無法保護(hù)受害人的合法權(quán)益，與法治社會(huì)的要求背道而馳。具體的規(guī)制辦法無法指定出來很大的原因是民事惡意訴訟行為在實(shí)踐中很難去識(shí)別，這類行為的隱蔽性極強(qiáng)。這就要求司法工作者們?cè)谡５乃痉ɑ顒?dòng)中利用各種各樣的辦法去將它識(shí)別出來，這也是本篇論文創(chuàng)造的目的。 民事惡意訴訟是指當(dāng)事人利用訴訟損害國(guó)家、集體或個(gè)人的合法利益，并為自己謀取不正當(dāng)利益的訴訟行為。它的成因是多方面的，，包括過度追求利益最大化、訴訟的負(fù)面效應(yīng)、法律制度的漏洞，通過對(duì)成因的分析，對(duì)這一行為做一個(gè)本質(zhì)的探究。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)民事惡意訴訟的規(guī)制辦法，主要是從立案前、庭審中、結(jié)案時(shí)三個(gè)時(shí)間段概括的，這三個(gè)時(shí)間段基本可以囊括民事惡意訴訟出現(xiàn)的所有時(shí)刻，通過介紹這些規(guī)制辦法，思考出我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的法律是如何識(shí)別出民事惡意訴訟行為的，進(jìn)而在之后兩章對(duì)識(shí)別方式做進(jìn)一步的推敲。民事惡意訴訟識(shí)別的基礎(chǔ)，通過民事惡意訴訟的主體、民事惡意訴訟的特點(diǎn)，民事惡意訴訟的識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)三個(gè)方面為其在訴訟過程中的識(shí)別問題打好基礎(chǔ)，這也是對(duì)這一行為進(jìn)一步的剖析，為識(shí)別對(duì)策掃清技術(shù)上的難題。民事惡意訴訟行為識(shí)別的難點(diǎn)與對(duì)策，這兩方面是相輔相成的，介紹難點(diǎn)，跨過難點(diǎn)，之后便是一片海闊天空，制定出識(shí)別對(duì)策，這些對(duì)策根據(jù)民事惡意訴訟表現(xiàn)出的不同類型進(jìn)行分類識(shí)別。
[Abstract]:Civil malicious litigation is an act that damages the interests of the state, collectives and individuals in litigation. In recent years, there has been a growing tendency for this kind of behavior to disturb the normal judicial order. We should pay attention to the rampant and harmful phenomenon of civil malice litigation, but the current law of our country can not evade it. In this way, the legitimate rights and interests of the victims cannot be protected, which runs counter to the requirements of a society governed by law. The major reason why specific regulatory measures cannot be specified is that civil malicious litigation acts are difficult to identify in practice. The hidden nature of this kind of behavior is very strong, which requires judicial workers to use various methods to identify it in normal judicial activities, which is also the purpose of this paper. The civil malicious lawsuit refers to the litigant who uses the lawsuit to damage the legitimate interests of the state, collective or individual, and to seek improper interests for himself. The causes of the action are various, including excessive pursuit of the maximization of interests. The negative effect of litigation, the loophole of legal system, through the analysis of the cause of formation, make an essential inquiry into this behavior. The conclusion of the case can be summarized in three time periods, these three time periods can basically include all the time of the emergence of civil malicious litigation, through the introduction of these regulatory measures, thinking out how the current law of our country is to identify civil malicious litigation acts, Then, in the next two chapters, the identification method is further examined. The basis of the identification of civil malicious litigation, through the main body of civil malicious litigation, the characteristics of civil malicious litigation, The three aspects of the identification standard of civil malicious litigation lay a good foundation for its identification in the process of litigation, which is also a further analysis of this behavior. In order to identify the countermeasures to clear the technical difficulties. The difficulties and countermeasures of the identification of civil malicious actions, these two aspects are complementary, introduce the difficulties, step over the difficulties, and then is a broad sky, to formulate the identification countermeasures, These countermeasures are classified and identified according to different types of civil malicious litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳慧;;當(dāng)前民事訴訟中的惡意調(diào)解現(xiàn)象及防范研究 兼談我國(guó)惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度的建立[J];法律適用;2007年05期

2 魏新璋;張軍斌;李燕山;;對(duì)“虛假訴訟”有關(guān)問題的調(diào)查與思考 以浙江法院防范和查處虛假訴訟的實(shí)踐為例[J];法律適用;2009年01期

3 徐愛國(guó);;英美法中“濫用法律訴訟”的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)家;2000年02期

4 湯維建;;論民事訴訟中的誠(chéng)信原則[J];法學(xué)家;2003年03期

5 袁寶成;完善我國(guó)民事訴訟擔(dān)保制度[J];法學(xué);1989年03期

6 張勝先,伍浩鵬;“惡意訴訟”的社會(huì)危害性及對(duì)策[J];河北法學(xué);2002年05期

7 章曉洪;論惡意訴訟[J];河北法學(xué);2005年05期

8 肖國(guó)耀;濫用訴訟權(quán)利問題探析[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

9 劉榮軍;誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則在民事訴訟中的適用[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年04期

10 陳桂明,李仕春;訴訟欺詐及其法律控制[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

本文編號(hào)：1531406