本文關(guān)鍵詞： 行政訴訟 當(dāng)事人 處分權(quán) 制度完善　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：無(wú)論從尊重個(gè)人主體性的憲政精神來(lái)說(shuō),還是保障當(dāng)事人主體地位的訴訟理念來(lái)看,當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建和完善都是一項(xiàng)意義重大的工程。隨著行政訴訟領(lǐng)域理論和實(shí)踐的改革與發(fā)展,尊重當(dāng)事人意愿、順從當(dāng)事人依法處置權(quán)利的行為,已得到越來(lái)越多人的支持。 但不得不承認(rèn),當(dāng)前我國(guó)關(guān)于行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)這一議題存在很多不完善之處,例如沒(méi)有相關(guān)原則性規(guī)定的支撐,處分權(quán)的范圍狹窄以及行使過(guò)程多受限制等。基于上述問(wèn)題的存在,制度建設(shè)就顯得尤為重要。本文在查閱相關(guān)資料的基礎(chǔ)上,從五個(gè)方面對(duì)我國(guó)行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建和完善進(jìn)行了闡述,并提出了具體的建議與對(duì)策,以期真正實(shí)現(xiàn)當(dāng)事人訴訟主體地位。 第一部分介紹當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)的界定問(wèn)題。主要介紹在行政訴訟中處分權(quán)的行使主體、行使方式,權(quán)利的主要內(nèi)容,并在此基礎(chǔ)上區(qū)分行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)與民事訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)之不同,以及原告和被告之間在具體權(quán)利上的不同之處。 第二部分介紹我國(guó)行政訴訟中當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)存在的正當(dāng)性。從學(xué)術(shù)理論和司法實(shí)踐兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論證,前者主要包括權(quán)利可處分的特征、行政訴權(quán)、程序正義等理論,后者則主要從提高司法權(quán)威、提高訴訟效率和減少當(dāng)事人抵觸情緒等現(xiàn)實(shí)意義上進(jìn)行考慮。 第三部分介紹當(dāng)前我國(guó)行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)在行使中所面臨的問(wèn)題。主要包括三個(gè)方面：缺乏原則性規(guī)定,行使過(guò)程多受限制或侵占,得處分的權(quán)利范圍狹窄。在第二個(gè)問(wèn)題的介紹上,選取了起訴、審理和裁判范圍、撤訴等幾個(gè)典型環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行分析。 第四部分介紹了完善我國(guó)行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)的可能性,即當(dāng)前所具備的得以完善的現(xiàn)實(shí)條件。隨著國(guó)內(nèi)行政訴訟理論和實(shí)踐的發(fā)展,在參考和借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和民事訴訟相關(guān)規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,我國(guó)已初步具備了構(gòu)建相應(yīng)制度的可能。 第五部分著重介紹完善當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)制度的對(duì)策。主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行：確立明確的處分原則,減少對(duì)相關(guān)權(quán)利行使過(guò)程中的限制和侵占,賦予當(dāng)事人更多事項(xiàng)上的處分權(quán),并且要妥善處理當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)與法院審判權(quán)之間的關(guān)系,促使二者之間形成制約、監(jiān)督和保障的良性互動(dòng)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:No matter from the constitutional spirit of respecting the individual subjectivity, or from the litigant idea of safeguarding the subject status of the parties, With the reform and development of the theory and practice in the field of administrative litigation, the behavior of respecting the will of the parties and obeying the parties to deal with the rights according to the law, It has gained more and more support. However, it has to be admitted that there are many imperfections in the current issue of the right to dispose of the parties in administrative proceedings in our country, for example, there is no support from the relevant provisions of principle. The scope of disciplinary power is narrow and the exercise process is restricted. Based on the above problems, the system construction is particularly important. This paper expounds the construction and perfection of the system of the litigant's right of disposition in administrative litigation in China from five aspects, and puts forward some concrete suggestions and countermeasures in order to realize the status of the litigant as the subject of litigation. The first part introduces the definition of the right of disposition of the parties. It mainly introduces the main body, the way of exercising, the main content of the right of disposition in the administrative litigation. On this basis, the author distinguishes the difference between the administrative litigant's disposition right and the civil litigant's disposition right, as well as the difference between the plaintiff and the defendant in the specific right. The second part introduces the legitimacy of the parties' right of disposition in our country's administrative litigation. The former mainly includes the characteristics of the right to dispose, the administrative right of action, the theory of procedural justice, and so on from two aspects: academic theory and judicial practice. The latter is mainly considered from the practical significance of improving the judicial authority, improving the efficiency of litigation and reducing the resistance of the parties. The third part introduces the problems in the exercise of the parties' right of disposition in administrative litigation in our country. It mainly includes three aspects: lack of rules of principle, restrictions or encroachment on the exercise process. The scope of the right to be punished is narrow. In the introduction of the second question, several typical links, such as prosecution, trial, adjudication and withdrawal, are selected for analysis. Part 4th introduces the possibility of perfecting the right to dispose of the parties in administrative litigation in China, that is, the realistic conditions which can be perfected. With the development of the theory and practice of administrative litigation in China, On the basis of referring to the advanced experience of foreign countries and the relevant provisions of civil litigation, our country has preliminarily possessed the possibility of constructing the corresponding system. Part 5th focuses on the countermeasures of perfecting the system of the parties' right to dispose. It mainly deals with the following aspects: establishing clear principles of disposition, reducing the restrictions and encroachment on the exercise of relevant rights, It is necessary to deal with the relationship between the party's disposition right and the court's jurisdiction properly, and to promote the positive interaction between them in terms of restriction, supervision and guarantee.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高春貴;;論行政訴訟當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)之法律保護(hù)[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

2 關(guān)保英;;論行政主體的職權(quán)處分權(quán)[J];東方法學(xué);2008年01期

3 莫紀(jì)宏;論人權(quán)的司法救濟(jì)[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年05期

4 宋爐安;評(píng)我國(guó)行政訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

5 曾哲;趙鐘根;;論行政訴訟執(zhí)行程序[J];東方法學(xué);2012年04期

6 徐國(guó)棟;市民社會(huì)與市民法——民法的調(diào)整對(duì)象研究[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年04期

7 韓香;;論民事訴訟處分原則的限制與糾正——兼論我國(guó)民事訴訟處分原則規(guī)定的完善[J];理論界;2011年08期

8 葉江,和牟;行政訴訟陪審制的缺陷與完善[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年09期

9 ;審理行政案件應(yīng)如何參照民事訴訟法?[J];人民司法;1993年07期

10 張家慧;處分原則下的當(dāng)事人訴訟行為[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1530922