本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事送達 電子化 實踐　出處：《湖南師范大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：民事送達是民事訴訟活動過程中的重要環(huán)節(jié),訴訟活動中各項程序的進行必定聯(lián)系著送達,起著將程序和實體相接的橋梁作用。送達的意義不僅在于將訴訟文書交給受送達的當事人和其他訴訟參與人,讓他們了解訴訟文書的內(nèi)容,以便他們據(jù)此參加訴訟活動,行使訴訟權(quán)利,履行訴訟義務(wù),而更重要的是送達行為包含進一步可能的法律后果,即法院依法將訴訟文書送達后,受送達人無正當理由耽誤訴訟期間或未按法院要求進行一定訴訟行為,則必須承擔由此產(chǎn)生的法律后果,送達的重要性不言而喻。而隨著我國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,人口流動性不斷加大,科學技術(shù)的普及以及我國國民受教育程度的提高,我國民事案件數(shù)量逐年遞增,而我國的民事送達方式呈現(xiàn)出多樣化、多元化的趨勢。同時,在司法實踐過程中送達仍是“老大難”問題,在多元化的信息時代，，電子科技的更新、信息技術(shù)的普及對于民事送達方式的進步有著創(chuàng)新性的意義,我國民事訴訟法修改后將電子化送達方式通過法律條文的形式予以確認,但對于實際操作過程中存在的問題并未去明確法律實施細則將之具化,電子化的送達操作規(guī)定和完整制度構(gòu)建在立法上仍處于空白狀態(tài)。本文通過分析電子化送達的產(chǎn)生的原因及利弊、電子化送達的立法現(xiàn)狀和在司法實踐的運行現(xiàn)狀,采集法院運用電子化方式與傳統(tǒng)送達方式進行送達的實際數(shù)據(jù)并將之比照,同時借鑒國外經(jīng)驗,針對我國電子化送達制度的完善提出建議,通過電子化的送達方式提高民事訴訟效率,便利訴訟參與人,最終實現(xiàn)程序上公正與效率的同步的目的。
[Abstract]:Civil service is an important link in the process of civil litigation. Serving as a bridge between the procedure and the entity... the purpose of service is not only to hand over the documents to the parties served and to other participants in the proceedings, so that they can understand the content of the legal instruments so that they can participate in the proceedings accordingly, Exercise the right of action, fulfill the obligation of action, and more importantly, the act of service contains further possible legal consequences, that is, after the court has served the litigation document according to law, If the addressee delays the proceedings or fails to act in accordance with the requirements of the court, he must bear the legal consequences arising therefrom. The importance of service is self-evident, and with the development of China's economy, With the increasing mobility of population, the popularization of science and technology and the improvement of the education level of Chinese people, the number of civil cases in our country is increasing year by year, while the mode of civil service in our country shows a trend of diversification and diversification. In the process of judicial practice, service is still a big problem. In the pluralistic information age, the updating of electronic science and technology and the popularization of information technology have innovative significance for the progress of civil service mode. After the amendment of the Civil procedure Law of our country, the electronic service mode is confirmed by the form of the legal provisions, but the problems existing in the actual operation process have not been made clear to the legal implementation rules. The operation regulation and complete system of electronic service are still in blank state in legislation. This paper analyzes the reasons and advantages and disadvantages of electronic service, the current legislative situation of electronic service and the current situation of its operation in judicial practice. Collect and compare the actual data of the court using the electronic method and the traditional way of service, and at the same time, draw lessons from the experience of foreign countries, and put forward some suggestions for the perfection of the electronic service system in our country. The purpose of synchronizing procedural justice and efficiency can be achieved by improving the efficiency of civil litigation through electronic service and facilitating the participants in the proceedings.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蘇佳;;論我國民事電子送達的建立與完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

2 Peter Gilles;張陳果;;德國民事訴訟程序電子化及其合法化與“E—民事訴訟法”之特殊規(guī)則[J];民事程序法研究;2007年00期

3 宋朝武;;電子司法的實踐運用與制度碰撞[J];中國政法大學學報;2011年06期

4 劉敏;;電子時代中國民事訴訟的變革[J];人民司法;2011年05期

5 何其生;;域外電子送達與《海牙送達公約》[J];訴訟法論叢;2005年00期

6 楊劍;;美國聯(lián)邦民事訴訟中采用電子送達的新趨勢[J];訴訟法論叢;2006年00期

本文編號：1523239