本文關(guān)鍵詞： 死刑復(fù)核程序 律師 有效辯護　出處：《四川省社會科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：死刑是剝奪人生命權(quán)的刑罰,一旦被執(zhí)行則不可逆轉(zhuǎn)。我國死刑復(fù)核程序是最高人民法院對判處死刑的案件進行最終審核的把關(guān)程序,充分發(fā)揮死刑復(fù)核程序的功能對限制死刑適用、避免死刑濫用、誤用至關(guān)重要。但死刑復(fù)核程序要充分發(fā)揮其價值功能,必須輔以完善的制度予以保障。其中,在死刑復(fù)核程序中建立律師有效辯護制度是充分發(fā)揮死刑復(fù)核程序價值作用的有效途徑。2012年修改后的《刑事訴訟法》及其司法解釋明確辯護律師可以在死刑復(fù)核過程中提出辯護意見,這是我國司法改革中的重大進步。但由于現(xiàn)行法律對此規(guī)定比較粗糙,法律并未明確規(guī)定死刑復(fù)核階段的法律援助問題,也未明確規(guī)定律師在死刑復(fù)核階段中享有的辯護權(quán)問題。再加上部分辯護律師自身執(zhí)業(yè)技能欠缺、執(zhí)業(yè)道德缺乏,導(dǎo)致辯護律師在死刑復(fù)核程序中難以為被告人提供有效的辯護。這不僅損害了被告人辯護權(quán)的行使,不利于對被告人的人權(quán)保障,而且也違背了設(shè)立死刑復(fù)核程序的初衷。因此,筆者建議,在死刑復(fù)核程序中,應(yīng)建立律師有效辯護制度,不僅在形式上要保障有辯護律師參與,而且更應(yīng)該在實質(zhì)上注重辯護律師參與死刑復(fù)核程序的效果。在死刑復(fù)核程序中建立律師有效辯護制度是死刑復(fù)核充分發(fā)揮作用的關(guān)鍵,也是程序正義的應(yīng)有之義。本文用四個章節(jié)探討我國死刑復(fù)核程序中律師的有效辯護的問題,并結(jié)合典型案例和相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)加以論證。第一章首先介紹死刑復(fù)核程序的內(nèi)涵、特點和功能,然后從律師有效辯護的內(nèi)涵,死刑復(fù)核程序中律師辯護問題的法律規(guī)定兩個方面概述死刑復(fù)核中的律師有效辯護問題。第二章闡述了死刑復(fù)核程序中律師辯護的現(xiàn)狀,如大部分被告人在死刑復(fù)核程序中沒有得到律師的辯護,即使有少數(shù)被告人得到了律師幫助辯護,辯護律師也難以有效行使辯護權(quán),而且現(xiàn)行死刑復(fù)核文書不載明辯護律師的意見等。然后結(jié)合現(xiàn)狀,從四個方面分析其原因:死刑復(fù)核程序的非對抗性和秘密性,法律援助缺位、律師進入死刑復(fù)核程序渠道受阻,現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)定粗糙、操作性不強,辯護律師執(zhí)業(yè)技能欠缺,責(zé)任心不強。第三章主要從國家尊重和保障人權(quán)的憲法要求,死刑案件程序正義的內(nèi)在要求,確保死刑復(fù)核質(zhì)量、防范冤假錯案發(fā)生的現(xiàn)實要求,提高司法公信力,促進刑事辯護專業(yè)化的時代要求四個方面探討在死刑復(fù)核程序中建立律師有效辯護制度的必要性。第四章從六個方面提出建立我國死刑復(fù)核程序中律師有效辯護制度的具體措施:一是明確死刑復(fù)核程序的屬性,改革死刑復(fù)核的方式;二是要完善法律援助制度,實現(xiàn)律師參與死刑復(fù)核程序全覆蓋;三是加強死刑復(fù)核程序中對律師辯護權(quán)的保障;四是要建立死刑案件的辯護律師的資格準(zhǔn)入制度;五是設(shè)立死刑復(fù)核中律師辯護的最低質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn);六是死刑復(fù)核裁判文書增加辯護意見和說理內(nèi)容并在網(wǎng)上公開。
[Abstract]:The death penalty is deprivation of life right punishment, once the execution is irreversible. China's death penalty review process is the Supreme People's court for a final check of death penalty cases of the control procedures, give full play to the function of the death penalty review procedure applicable to limit the death penalty, the death penalty to avoid abuse, misuse is essential. But we should give full play to the death penalty review procedure the value function, must be supplemented by a perfect system to protect it. Among them, in the death penalty review process to establish effective lawyer defense system is to give full play to the role of the value of the death penalty review procedure effective way.2012 revised "Criminal Procedure Law > and clear judicial interpretation of the defense lawyer may in the death penalty review process is put forward to defend opinions, this is great progress in China's judicial reform. But due to the current law of rough comparison, the law does not specify the legal aid to the death penalty review stage To help the problem, also not clearly defined the right of defense lawyers have problems in the death penalty review stage. Plus some lawyers practicing their own lack of skills, lack of professional ethics, to provide effective defense counsel in the review of the death penalty to the defendant. This exercise not only harm the defendant, not to protect human rights of the accused, but also contrary to the original intention of the establishment of the death penalty review procedure. Therefore, the author suggests that in the death penalty, lawyers should establish effective defense system, not only to protect the defense lawyers involved in the form, but also should pay attention to in terms of Defense lawyers involved in the death penalty review process effect built in the death penalty law effective defense system is the death penalty review and give full play to the role of the key, is the proper meaning of procedural justice. This paper with four chapters on the death penalty in China The effective defense of the judicial review of the problems, combined with the typical case and the relevant data to be demonstrated. The first chapter introduces the connotation of the death penalty review procedure, characteristics and functions, and then from the connotation of effective defense lawyers, lawyers effective defense issues outlined in the death penalty review in two aspects of the provisions of the defense lawyer problem in the procedure of death penalty review law. The second chapter introduces the status of lawyer in the procedure of death penalty review, such as most of the defendant did not get an attorney in the death penalty, even if there are a few defendants are a lawyer to help defend lawyer, is also difficult to effectively exercise the right of defense, and the current death penalty review documents not stated in the defense counsel then. Combined with the status quo, analyzes the reasons from four aspects: non confrontational and secret of the death penalty review procedure. The absence of legal aid lawyers to enter the death penalty review process, Order channels blocked, the current legislation is rough, operability is not strong, the defense lawyers lack of skills, strong sense of responsibility. The third chapter mainly from the requirement of respecting and safeguarding human rights in the constitution, the death penalty case requirement of procedural justice, to ensure the quality of the death penalty review, to prevent miscarriages of justice occurred practical requirements, improve the judicial credibility to promote the professional requirements of the times of criminal defense lawyers to discuss the necessity of effective defense system in the death penalty review procedure in four aspects. The fourth chapter puts forward concrete measures for establishing the effective system of our country's lawyer in the procedure of death penalty review from six aspects: one is the attribute of the death penalty review procedure. The reform of the death penalty review way; two it is necessary to improve the legal aid system, to achieve full coverage of lawyers involved in the death penalty review procedure; the three is to strengthen the death penalty review procedure to protect the right to counsel; the four is to build up the dead The qualification admittance system of defense counsel for criminal cases is established. The five is to set up the lowest quality standard for lawyer defense in the review of death penalty; the six is to review the death penalty, increase the defense opinions and reasoning contents, and make public online.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 高子程;盧建平;陳瑞華;;以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革:律師的職業(yè)定位[J];中國法律評論;2016年01期

2 劉計劃;;死刑冤案的程序控制[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年06期

，

本文編號：1517096