本文關(guān)鍵詞： 刑民交叉 先刑后民 先民后刑 刑民并行　出處：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在司法實踐中，常出現(xiàn)刑事案件和民事案件發(fā)生競合的情形。長期以來，實務上針對該類案件主要以“先刑后民”為模式處理。盡管“先刑后民”已成為事實上的指導原則，但立法上并無明確規(guī)定。同時隨著商品經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，該處理模式逐漸不能滿足部分刑民交叉類案件的需求，使得當事人的合法權(quán)益不能得到及時的救濟和充分的保障，法律的權(quán)威也受到損害。鑒于理論界和司法實踐中對刑民交叉案件的認知不一，本文對該類案件進行重新定義和劃分，并試圖從法理基礎(chǔ)上質(zhì)疑“先刑后民”處理模式的合理性，同時從司法現(xiàn)狀的典型案例中分析該處理模式的現(xiàn)實問題，提出刑民交叉類案件的例外處理模式。此外，本文運用比較法的方式將域外的刑民交叉案件模式進行借鑒，由此大膽設(shè)想我國刑民交叉案件的例外處理模式。 本文總共分為五部分： 第一章主要在現(xiàn)有的學術(shù)觀點的基礎(chǔ)上對刑民交叉案件進行重新定義，并依據(jù)表現(xiàn)形式將其類型化；同時結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有的司法解釋和司法實踐，對處理刑民交叉案件的模式進行了歸納總結(jié)，分別為：“先刑后民”、“先民后刑”、“刑民并行”。 第二章則主要對“先刑后民”處理模式的法規(guī)條例進行梳理，從該處理模式長期存在的成因角度分析其法理基礎(chǔ)的不足。此外，，通過對司法現(xiàn)狀該處理模式的濫用分析其存在的現(xiàn)實問題。 第三章則從理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實需要兩方面對“先刑后民”處理模式進行例外評析。 第四章運用比較法的研究方式將域外處理刑民交叉案件的模式進行列舉，如刑事附帶民事訴訟處理模式和刑民訴訟分開審理模式，從中獲得對我國刑民交叉案件處理模式的啟示。 第五章通過對“先刑后民”例外模式的設(shè)想，提出具體模式的證明和證明標準以及對事實認定的處理，為解決刑民交叉案件提供一些建議，為我國刑民交叉案件的妥善解決和處理提供思路。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, criminal cases often coincide with civil cases. For a long time, in practice, this kind of cases is mainly dealt with in the mode of "first punishment before people", although "first punishment before people" has become a de facto guiding principle. At the same time, with the development of commodity economy, the model can not meet the needs of some criminal cases, which makes the legitimate rights and interests of the parties can not be timely relief and adequate protection. The authority of the law has also been damaged. In view of the different cognition of cross-criminal cases in theory and judicial practice, this paper redefines and classifies such cases. It also tries to question the rationality of the treatment mode of "first punishment before people" on the basis of jurisprudence, at the same time, analyzes the practical problems of this mode from the typical cases of judicial status, and puts forward the exceptional handling mode of cross-type cases of criminal and civilian. This article uses the method of comparative law to draw lessons from the mode of extra-territorial criminal and civilian cross cases, thus boldly conceive the exceptional handling mode of criminal and civil cross cases in our country. This paper is divided into five parts:. The first chapter mainly redefines the cross-criminal cases based on the existing academic viewpoints, and classifies them according to their forms of expression; at the same time, combined with the existing judicial interpretation and judicial practice in China, This paper sums up the modes of dealing with the cross cases of criminal and civilian, which are as follows: first punishment after people "," foreman after punishment "," parallel between criminal and civilian ". The second chapter mainly combs the laws and regulations of the "first punishment before the people" treatment model, and analyzes the deficiency of its legal basis from the point of view of the causes of the long-term existence of the treatment model. Through the abuse of the handling mode of the judicial status quo, it analyzes the existing practical problems. The third chapter makes an exception analysis on the treatment mode of "first punishment before people" from two aspects: theoretical basis and practical need. Chapter 4th enumerates the modes of extra-territorial handling of cross-criminal cases, such as the mode of handling criminal incidental civil proceedings and the mode of separate trial of criminal proceedings. From this, we can get the enlightenment to the mode of dealing with the cross-cases of criminal and civilian in our country. Chapter 5th, through the assumption of the exceptional mode of "first sentence before the people", puts forward the proof and proof standard of the specific model and the handling of the fact, and provides some suggestions for solving the cross-criminal cases. To provide ideas for the proper resolution and handling of cross-criminal cases in China.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 周海浪;;先予執(zhí)行可以重復適用[J];人民司法;2011年18期

2 萬毅;;“先刑后民”原則的實踐困境及其理論破解[J];上海交通大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年02期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 侯雪;刑事?lián)p害賠償法律制度研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

本文編號：1505935