本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論 司法公正 社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析 內(nèi)容分析法 司法審判　出處：《湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)化的雙向傳輸優(yōu)勢(shì)，提供了民眾關(guān)注司法審判的平臺(tái)。然而，網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)社會(huì)道德以是非為判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，在不同的情況下，法律意義上的公平和正義，有者不同的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；再加上網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論主體的素質(zhì)不高、偏情緒化，，更缺少應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)墓芾泶胧�，讓本�?lái)就不太好的司法環(huán)境，更加的被動(dòng)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)大眾的輿論常常跳出了原本的范圍，這種強(qiáng)有力的力量給司法機(jī)關(guān)中的人員產(chǎn)生了巨大的壓力，對(duì)司法客觀審判也起到了沖擊。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的輿論非常復(fù)雜，一般人很難辨別哪些是客觀正確的，哪些是虛假的，這樣產(chǎn)生的作用，不然不能被認(rèn)為是都正確的，廣大老百姓的美好愿望，也不能通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)來(lái)全部實(shí)現(xiàn)。僅僅只能說(shuō)是老百姓的一種強(qiáng)烈的愿望同司法公正的目標(biāo)，天然的連接在了一起。怎樣避免輿論同司法審判之間的不和諧，肯定是我們應(yīng)當(dāng)正視的問(wèn)題。只有科學(xué)地、辯證地分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)司法審判的影響，并在保證依法審判的前提下，利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論推動(dòng)法治的進(jìn)步，才能真正發(fā)揮網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)司法審判的正向價(jià)值。 本文通過(guò)五個(gè)部分來(lái)論述：第一部分：詳細(xì)說(shuō)明了論文寫作的目的、意義。在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)閱讀的基礎(chǔ)上，形成了比較詳實(shí)的綜述。 第二部分:概述了輿論、網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論、司法審判的相關(guān)概念，分析了他們之間的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)。其中對(duì)司法審判監(jiān)督的論述，既總結(jié)了傳統(tǒng)的監(jiān)督方式，也分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論的監(jiān)督方式。 第三部分:從正反兩個(gè)角度分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論如何影響司法審判，既對(duì)影響的具體表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行了分析，也對(duì)引起這些影響的原因進(jìn)行了細(xì)致的分析。并以理論分析為手段，宏觀分析為角度。 第四部分:以“7·20首都機(jī)場(chǎng)爆炸案”為例，對(duì)主題進(jìn)行個(gè)案研究，分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)司法審判的影響。采用社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的分析方法、內(nèi)容分析的方法等實(shí)證研究手段。利用Ucinet和其它分析軟件，對(duì)相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行了數(shù)據(jù)收集和統(tǒng)計(jì)，并對(duì)所得數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了分析和解釋，給出有針對(duì)性的建議。 第五部分:就司法機(jī)關(guān)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論背景下如何依法審判給出了相應(yīng)的建議。如：提高網(wǎng)絡(luò)認(rèn)識(shí)、注重網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論數(shù)據(jù)收集，完善立法等。
[Abstract]:The advantage of two-way transmission of information network provides a platform for people to pay attention to judicial trial. However, network public opinion regards right and wrong as the criterion of judging social morality, and under different circumstances, the fairness and justice in the sense of law. There are different evaluation criteria; In addition, the quality of the main body of network public opinion is not high, emotional, more lack of management measures should be, so that the judicial environment is not good, more passive. The public opinion of the network often jumped out of the original scope. This powerful force exerts great pressure on the personnel of judicial organs, and also impacts the objective judicial trial. The public opinion in the network is very complex, the average person is very difficult to distinguish which is objective correct, which is false, such produces the function, otherwise cannot be considered to be all correct, the broad masses of people's good wishes. Can not be fully realized through the network. Can only be said to be a strong desire of the common people and the goal of judicial justice, the natural link together. How to avoid the public opinion and judicial trial between the disharmony. It is certain that we should face up to the problem. Only by scientifically and dialectically analyzing the influence of network public opinion on judicial trial, and under the premise of ensuring the trial according to law, we should use network public opinion to promote the progress of the rule of law. Only then can the network public opinion bring into play the positive value of the judicial trial. This paper is discussed in five parts: the first part: the purpose and significance of the thesis writing are explained in detail. On the basis of reading the relevant literature at home and abroad, a more detailed summary is formed. The second part: summarizes the public opinion, the network public opinion, the judicial trial related concept, has analyzed the inherent relation between them. Among them, the discussion to the judicial trial supervision, has summarized the traditional supervision way. It also analyzes the supervision way of network public opinion. The third part: from the perspective of positive and negative analysis of the network public opinion how to influence the judicial trial, both the impact of the specific performance of the analysis. The causes of these effects are also analyzed in detail, and the theoretical analysis is taken as the means and the macroscopic analysis is taken as the angle. Part 4th: taking the bombing of July 20 Capital Airport as an example, this paper makes a case study on the theme and analyzes the influence of network public opinion on judicial trial. The method of content analysis and other empirical research methods. Using Ucinet and other analysis software, the data collection and statistics of relevant cases are carried out, and the data are analyzed and explained. Give specific suggestions. Part 5th: it gives the corresponding suggestions on how to judge the judicial organs according to law under the background of network public opinion, such as improving the understanding of the network, paying attention to the data collection of public opinion on the network, perfecting the legislation and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D926;G206

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅智敏;;從鄧玉嬌案看民眾“干預(yù)”司法的若干問(wèn)題[J];比較法研究;2009年06期

2 王越;梁剛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論監(jiān)督與司法審判互動(dòng)——以“鄧玉嬌案”為例[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 任雪麗;;試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)公共權(quán)力的監(jiān)督[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 卞仁彪;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論與法院審判的關(guān)系探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年05期

5 杜光平;蔣靜;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)司法審判監(jiān)督的正當(dāng)性[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年35期

6 杜可清;;輿論監(jiān)督和司法公正的法理思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年25期

7 鄧達(dá)江;肖穎;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論對(duì)司法審判公正的影響[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年08期

8 浙江省杭州市中級(jí)人民法院課題組;翁鋼糧;鄧興廣;;司法審判與網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情的和諧互動(dòng)之道[J];法治研究;2011年07期

9 邸燦;;公權(quán)力與私權(quán)利的沖突與平衡[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2009年04期

10 紀(jì)紅;馬小潔;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情的搜集、分析和引導(dǎo)[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉李明;社會(huì)輿論的司法意蘊(yùn)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

2 劉序明;網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督在反腐敗中的作用研究[D];中共中央黨校;2012年

本文編號(hào)：1481550