國有獨資公司資產(chǎn)監(jiān)管機制初探
[Abstract]:The wholly state-owned company is the product and the legal form of the reform of the state-owned enterprise in our country. One of the important considerations of independent state investment to set up a company is to maintain national security, take into account social interests, ensure the normal operation of the national economy, and engage in those business affairs that the society can not run and the state has to do. In our country, wholly state-owned companies involve a wide range of fields and have a wide range of influence. The establishment and improvement of wholly state-owned companies is aimed at deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises, mastering the direction of national economic development, and then on the economic development of the whole country. Social stability is of great significance. At the same time, the wholly state-owned companies in our country have been troubled by the absence of owners, the distinction between government and enterprises, and the lack of effective supervision of managers. Although the theoretical and practical exploration has achieved achievements for many years, it has still failed to achieve good results. This paper takes this problem as the center, mainly through the comparative analysis and the system analysis method, proposed from the asset supervision, compares the fund operation mode to construct the state-owned sole proprietorship company supervision new model. This paper summarizes the experience and lessons of the reform of state-owned enterprises since the reform and opening up in China, and probes into this system in combination with the objective laws of the market economy and the related theories of commercial law. The full text is divided into three parts: the first part mainly analyzes the uniqueness of wholly state-owned companies in China, and is also the logical starting point for the supervision of wholly state-owned companies. On the basis of defining and defining its concept, this paper expounds it from four aspects: 1. The singleness and specificity of investment subject; 2. The specificity of the emergence and development: it is a special form of company established in the process of reforming the state-owned enterprises in the process of establishing the socialist market economy system; 3. Status, the uniqueness of the role: involving a wide range of fields, a wide range of influence, plays an important role in the national economy; 4. Compared with other forms of company, the organizational structure is obviously different, and the development is not in place in one step. The second part mainly discusses the particularity of supervision of wholly state-owned companies. First of all, this paper analyzes and expounds the problems existing in the wholly state-owned company; secondly, it explains the existing regulatory methods, analyzes its disadvantages, and draws the conclusion that it has not effectively solved the problems existing in the wholly state-owned company. On this basis, an ideal supervision mode is put forward, and it is described concretely from two aspects: the road sign followed and the realization mode. The third part compares the fund operation mode, constructs the state-owned sole proprietorship company assets supervision mechanism. Firstly, the operation mode and related theories of the fund are defined, and then the constituent elements and concrete operation of the regulatory system are described on the basis of the trust relationship theory. The innovation of this paper mainly lies in comparing with the operation mode of the fund, trying to combine supervision and management organically through the indirect supervision means of asset supervision, and construct a new type of supervision system of wholly state-owned company combining prior supervision with ex post supervision.
【學位授予單位】:中央民族大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D922.291.91
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 趙樹杰;李婧;;論國資委在國有獨資公司中的職權[J];牡丹江大學學報;2011年07期
2 國務院國資委監(jiān)事會課題組;;現(xiàn)行外派監(jiān)事會制度面臨的難題[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2011年36期
3 李眾敏;;央企境外資產(chǎn)監(jiān)管重在機制建設[J];世界知識;2011年14期
4 李天星;;國際化經(jīng)營的法律保障——《境外資產(chǎn)監(jiān)管辦法》和《境外產(chǎn)權管理辦法》解讀[J];中國石油企業(yè);2011年08期
5 李佐漢;;侯某構成貪污罪——兼與常建黨同志探討[J];中國檢察官;2011年12期
6 ;2010年工會組織和工會工作發(fā)展狀況統(tǒng)計公報[J];中國工運;2011年08期
7 崔帥;;國有獨資公司職工董事制度探析[J];經(jīng)濟師;2011年07期
8 劉宇翔;;對公司高管天價薪酬的法律思考[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2011年02期
9 黃振中;;論高校資產(chǎn)經(jīng)營公司一人公司形式之揚棄[J];國有資產(chǎn)管理;2010年02期
10 山東省國資委課題組;汲斌昌;石長河;;國資監(jiān)管機構行權履職的指針——對實施《企業(yè)國有資產(chǎn)法》的意見和建議[J];國有資產(chǎn)管理;2010年04期
相關會議論文 前10條
1 嚴繼超;;中國國有獨資公司外派監(jiān)事會制度研究[A];第五屆(2010)中國管理學年會——公司治理分會場論文集[C];2010年
2 葛春林;;對國有軍工企業(yè)實施規(guī)范改制現(xiàn)實問題的思考[A];新世紀 新機遇 新挑戰(zhàn)——知識創(chuàng)新和高新技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展(上冊)[C];2001年
3 李康寧;;國有資本運營的法律障礙與解決路徑[A];中國商法年刊第三卷(2003)[C];2003年
4 ;河南物資集團公司[A];全國生產(chǎn)資料流通行業(yè)紀念改革開放30周年座談會資料匯編[C];2008年
5 馮亞;;國有獨資公司的治理問題研究[A];第七屆中國煤炭經(jīng)濟管理論壇暨2006年中國煤炭學會經(jīng)濟管理專業(yè)委員會年會論文集[C];2006年
6 杜恒;;國有獨資公司治理權力優(yōu)化配置研究[A];第五屆國有經(jīng)濟論壇“海峽兩岸企業(yè)改革與重組”學術研討會論文集[C];2005年
7 兗礦集團有限公司法人治理結構研究課題組;;國有獨資公司的法人治理結構建設——兗礦集團有限公司法人治理結構研究[A];2004中國生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展研究報告[C];2005年
8 肖海軍;;論國有獨資公司董事長的權源結構與運行[A];中國商法年刊第三卷(2003)[C];2003年
9 黃朗喜;;國有獨資公司法人治理結構研究[A];中國企業(yè)運籌學學術交流大會論文集[C];2007年
10 ;煙草商業(yè)企業(yè)理順資產(chǎn)管理體制后的任務及期待[A];中國煙草學會2006年學術年會論文集[C];2007年
相關重要報紙文章 前10條
1 袁菲 Q孟推,
本文編號:2475713
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2475713.html