【摘要】：2008年12月11日，聯(lián)合國(guó)第63屆大會(huì)第67次會(huì)議正式通過(guò)了《聯(lián)合國(guó)全程或部分國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸公約》，并于2009年9月23日在荷蘭鹿特丹舉行了簽字儀式，將公約定名為《鹿特丹規(guī)則》。這部新公約對(duì)托運(yùn)人制度作出了很多重大的變革。以往的三個(gè)已經(jīng)生效的國(guó)際海運(yùn)公約可以說(shuō)是以承運(yùn)人為中心的，，重點(diǎn)規(guī)定承運(yùn)人的義務(wù)與責(zé)任�！堵固氐ひ�(guī)則》一改以往的國(guó)際公約中托運(yùn)人不受重視的狀況，對(duì)托運(yùn)人投入了很大的熱情和精力�！堵固氐ひ�(guī)則》重新規(guī)定了托運(yùn)人的定義，引入了單證托運(yùn)人，并且對(duì)托運(yùn)人的權(quán)利與義務(wù)分別進(jìn)行了比較詳細(xì)的規(guī)定。本文從托運(yùn)人出發(fā)，比較《鹿特丹規(guī)則》與以往三個(gè)公約規(guī)定的不同，分析《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中托運(yùn)人制度的優(yōu)劣，最后結(jié)合我國(guó)海運(yùn)的實(shí)踐，對(duì)《海商法》的修改提出一定的建議。全文分為引言、正文和結(jié)論三個(gè)部分。
[Abstract]:At its 67th meeting, on 11 December 2008, the General Assembly of the United Nations formally adopted the United Nations Convention on the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea and held a signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Name the Convention the Rotterdam rules. This new convention has made many major changes to the shipper's system. The three previous international maritime conventions that have entered into force can be said to be carrier-centered, focusing on the obligations and responsibilities of the carrier. The Rotterdam rules change the situation in which shippers are not attached importance to in previous international conventions. Great enthusiasm and energy have been invested in the shipper. The Rotterdam rules redefine the shipper, introduce the documentary shipper, and specify the rights and obligations of the shipper in detail. Starting from the shipper, this paper compares the differences between the Rotterdam rules and the previous three conventions, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the shipper system in the Rotterdam rules, and finally combines the practice of shipping in China. Some suggestions on the amendment of Maritime Law are put forward. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭萍;朱珂;;從國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸公約的變革看船貨雙方利益的博弈[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

2 汪忠華;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下托運(yùn)人義務(wù)變化的初探[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2010年02期

3 馬得懿;;FOB條件下賣方風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)題研究——以托運(yùn)人制度為視角[J];法商研究;2008年04期

4 張榮忠;;集裝箱運(yùn)輸中的托運(yùn)人決定權(quán)[J];集裝箱化;2008年01期

5 姚洪秀,林暉;論我國(guó)《海商法》下“托運(yùn)人”的認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1996年00期

6 李海;關(guān)于“提單是物權(quán)憑證”的反思──兼論提單的法律性質(zhì)[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1996年00期

7 郭春風(fēng);論對(duì)《中國(guó)海商法》托運(yùn)人定義及其相關(guān)條款的修改[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1998年00期

8 司玉琢,胡正良;我國(guó)《海商法》修改的必要性[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2002年00期

9 袁發(fā)強(qiáng);馬之遙;;平衡抑或完善——評(píng)《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對(duì)海運(yùn)雙方當(dāng)事人權(quán)利與義務(wù)的規(guī)制[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2009年04期

10 司玉琢;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的評(píng)價(jià)與展望[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2009年Z1期

本文編號(hào)：2475377