發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-01 07:31

【摘要】：專利權(quán)保護(hù)的司法救濟(jì)作為專利權(quán)司法行政保護(hù)雙軌制的重要組成部分，在專利權(quán)的保護(hù)方面發(fā)揮了主要的積極作用。本文主要是對(duì)專利侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則、專利侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定、專利賠償?shù)呐卸ǖ壤碚撋夏：�、�?shí)踐上難以把握的問題進(jìn)行了論述。作者認(rèn)為，認(rèn)定專利侵權(quán)，，無(wú)需看主觀過錯(cuò)；判令承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任，則要看主觀心理。對(duì)于侵權(quán)判定，要在區(qū)分必要技術(shù)特征和非必要技術(shù)特征的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行增減等同的判斷；對(duì)外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利，要突出一般標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、普通消費(fèi)者眼光。在賠償數(shù)額的計(jì)算上，要強(qiáng)調(diào)合理性原則，把專利權(quán)人查明、制止侵權(quán)的合理費(fèi)用計(jì)算在內(nèi)。以此，通過理論上的探討進(jìn)一步指導(dǎo)司法實(shí)踐。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the dual-track system of judicial protection of patent right, the judicial remedy of patent right protection has played a major positive role in the protection of patent right. This paper mainly discusses the principles of imputation of patent infringement, the identification of patent infringement, the judgment of patent compensation, etc., which are vague in theory and difficult to grasp in practice. The author thinks that the determination of patent infringement does not need to look at the subjective fault, and the judgment of liability for compensation depends on the subjective psychology. On the basis of distinguishing necessary technical features from non-essential technical features, we should judge the equivalent of additions and deletions, and give prominence to the general standard and common consumer's vision for the patent of design. In the calculation of the amount of compensation, we should emphasize the principle of reasonableness, and include the reasonable expenses of the patentee to find out and stop the infringement. In this way, through the theoretical discussion to further guide the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉京;專利侵權(quán)損害賠償研究[D];北京化工大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2451364