【摘要】：作為近年來(lái)法學(xué)界的研究熱點(diǎn),公益訴訟的研究領(lǐng)域橫跨訴訟法、民商法、經(jīng)濟(jì)法、行政法、環(huán)境法等諸多學(xué)科�；趯W(xué)術(shù)研究的需要,學(xué)者們習(xí)慣于從個(gè)人的特定視角來(lái)界定公益訴訟,并以此為基礎(chǔ)展開(kāi)研究。盡管各起爐灶、互不干涉的研究方式使得對(duì)公益訴訟的研究百花齊放,但也因此導(dǎo)致了對(duì)公益訴訟界定的混亂。民事訴訟法修正案新增了公益訴訟條款后,考慮到司法者在個(gè)案裁判時(shí)對(duì)該條款的適用,對(duì)公益訴訟進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確界定已成為現(xiàn)實(shí)且急迫的需要。基于公共利益的不確定性,應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合立法和司法、正向和反向等多種方法解釋公共利益,并在此基礎(chǔ)上準(zhǔn)確界定公益訴訟。
[Abstract]:As a research hotspot in recent years, the research field of public interest litigation spans many disciplines, such as procedural law, civil and commercial law, economic law, administrative law, environmental law and so on. According to the need of academic research, scholars are used to define public interest litigation from the specific perspective of individuals, and carry out research based on it. Although various stoves and non-interference research methods make the study of public interest litigation blooming, but it also leads to the confusion of the definition of public interest litigation. After the amendment of civil procedure law adds the clause of public interest litigation, considering the application of this clause when the judicial judge decides the case, the accurate definition of public interest litigation has become a realistic and urgent need. Based on the uncertainty of public interest, the public interest should be interpreted by many methods, such as legislation and judicature, positive and reverse, and on this basis, the public interest litigation should be defined accurately.
【作者單位】： 集美大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 楊名;預(yù)防公共利益之濫用——訪中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員 劉俊海[J];小康;2005年12期

2 曾祥華;;公共利益的界定方法探討[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

3 劉連泰;;“公共利益”的解釋困境及其突圍[J];文史哲;2006年02期

4 林莉紅;;法社會(huì)學(xué)視野下的中國(guó)公益訴訟[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2008年01期

5 歐陽(yáng)晨雨;;物權(quán)法草案:“公共利益”緣何不作界定?[J];政府法制;2006年19期

6 王利明;;物權(quán)法草案中征收征用制度的完善[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2005年06期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何志鵬;;非社會(huì)契約論[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2005年01期

2 韓春暉;;論行政處分對(duì)象的范圍[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2005年01期

3 張，

本文編號(hào)：2433542