【摘要】：破產(chǎn)法對市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的建立具有重要作用，它往往是衡量一國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)成熟程度的重要標(biāo)志之一。破產(chǎn)法的核心在于，以破產(chǎn)方式終止企業(yè)法人資格時，債務(wù)人只負(fù)有以實(shí)有財(cái)產(chǎn)清償債務(wù)的責(zé)任，并免除其它不能償還部分的清償義務(wù)。破產(chǎn)法的初衷本是為了優(yōu)化市場，平衡債權(quán)人與債務(wù)人之間的利益，給債務(wù)人以更生的機(jī)會。然而，當(dāng)法律對某一群體的保護(hù)走到極致時，法律往往被這一群體當(dāng)作謀取私利的工具。 當(dāng)前我國社會上就有不少債務(wù)人利用這一規(guī)定，，事先策劃以種種方式將企業(yè)主要有效經(jīng)營資產(chǎn)抽走，以僅剩下少許廢舊物資的空殼企業(yè)承擔(dān)原企業(yè)的全部債務(wù)，再申請破產(chǎn)，以達(dá)到逃避債務(wù)清償?shù)哪康摹Ｓ捎谀壳拔覈鐣w信用意識尚處于貧困狀態(tài)，因此，給予債權(quán)人以充分的法律保障在相當(dāng)長的一段時間內(nèi)都將是民商法最重要的任務(wù)之一。破產(chǎn)法作為規(guī)范市場主體退出機(jī)制的商事法律更應(yīng)肩負(fù)起對債權(quán)人利益實(shí)施臨終關(guān)懷的神圣使命。 然而，相比市場對破產(chǎn)法的極高期望，我國現(xiàn)行法律對債務(wù)人破產(chǎn)欺詐的規(guī)定顯得過于粗糙和簡陋，不利于對債權(quán)人利益的保護(hù)。這些破產(chǎn)欺詐行為如不能在法律上給予明確的定性，及時得到有力的制止，破產(chǎn)法的實(shí)施將步入一個可悲的誤區(qū)。 本文基于我國現(xiàn)行破產(chǎn)法之規(guī)定，比較、借鑒當(dāng)今發(fā)達(dá)國家之立法，立足于破產(chǎn)法對欺詐轉(zhuǎn)移的法律規(guī)制這一角度，對欺詐轉(zhuǎn)移的認(rèn)定、效力和相關(guān)人員的責(zé)任等方面進(jìn)行了闡述，最終提出構(gòu)建我國欺詐轉(zhuǎn)移法律體系的若干見解。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy law plays an important role in the establishment of market economy system, and it is often one of the important marks to measure the maturity of a country's market economy. The core of the bankruptcy law is that when the enterprise legal personality is terminated by bankruptcy, the debtor is only liable to pay off the debt with real property and is relieved of the other non-repayable part of the repayment obligation. The original intention of bankruptcy law is to optimize the market, balance the interests between creditors and debtors, and give the debtor the opportunity to rehabilitate. However, when the legal protection of a group of people to the extreme, the law is often used by this group as a tool for personal gain. At present, quite a number of debtors in our society have used this provision to plan in advance to withdraw the main effective operating assets of the enterprises in various ways, so that shell enterprises with only a few scrap materials will assume all the debts of the original enterprises and apply for bankruptcy again. In order to avoid paying off debts. At present, the whole credit consciousness of our country is still in the state of poverty, so it will be one of the most important tasks of civil and commercial law to give sufficient legal protection to creditors in a long period of time. Bankruptcy law, as a commercial law regulating the withdrawal mechanism of market subjects, should shoulder the sacred mission of carrying out hospice care to the interests of creditors. However, compared with the extremely high expectations of the market for bankruptcy law, the current law of our country is too rough and simple to protect the interests of creditors. If these bankruptcy fraud can not be clearly defined in the law and can be stopped in time, the implementation of bankruptcy law will step into a sad misunderstanding. Based on the provisions of the current bankruptcy law of our country, this paper compares and draws lessons from the legislation of today's developed countries, based on the legal regulation of fraud transfer in the bankruptcy law, and determines the fraud transfer. Finally, the author puts forward some opinions on constructing the legal system of fraud transfer in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：D912.29

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張龐坤;破產(chǎn)欺詐法律規(guī)制研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2011年

2 劉青一;虛假破產(chǎn)罪研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2429661