【摘要】：根據(jù)運(yùn)輸貨物時(shí)起運(yùn)港和目的港的地理位置不同,可以將水路貨物運(yùn)輸分為國際海上貨物運(yùn)輸和國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸。就我國而言,國際海上貨物運(yùn)輸是指在不同國家港口之間從事的貨物運(yùn)輸,而國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸是指在我國沿海各港口之間、沿海港口與內(nèi)河港口之間以及內(nèi)河港口之間從事的貨物運(yùn)輸。由于《海商法》第四章明確規(guī)定該章僅適用于國際海上貨物運(yùn)輸,因此,在國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域主要以《中華人民共和國民法通則》(以下簡稱《民法通則》)、《中華人民共和國合同法》(以下簡稱《合同法》)及其相關(guān)司法解釋作為調(diào)整國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸法律關(guān)系的依據(jù)。其中,關(guān)于實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度僅有已廢止的《國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸規(guī)則》(以下簡稱《貨規(guī)》)中有所規(guī)定。但是《貨規(guī)》已于2016年5月30日廢止,這就造成了實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度的法律空缺。在此情形下,筆者分析了實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度缺失通過現(xiàn)行法律解決的不可行性,論述了實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度亟需立法構(gòu)造,最后提出應(yīng)以原《貨規(guī)》和《海商法》為藍(lán)本,可在未來《民法典》合同編中,從實(shí)際承運(yùn)人含義、權(quán)利義務(wù)和責(zé)任三個(gè)方面入手重新構(gòu)造實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度,以期解決國內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度缺失的問題,對國內(nèi)航運(yùn)運(yùn)輸發(fā)展有所裨益。
[Abstract]:According to the different geographical position between the port of departure and the port of destination, waterway cargo transport can be divided into international sea cargo transport and domestic waterway cargo transport. In the case of China, the international carriage of goods by sea refers to the carriage of goods between ports of different countries, while the domestic carriage of goods by sea refers to the transport of goods between the ports along the coast of our country. Transport of goods between coastal ports and inland ports and between inland ports. As Chapter IV of the Maritime Law clearly stipulates that this chapter applies only to the international carriage of goods by sea, in the field of domestic carriage of goods by sea, the general principles of civil law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the General principles of the Civil Law") are mainly used in the field of domestic carriage of goods by water. "contract Law of the people's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as "contract Law") and its related judicial interpretation as the basis for adjusting the legal relationship of domestic waterway freight transport. Among them, the actual carrier system only has been abolished in the domestic regulations for the carriage of goods by water (hereinafter referred to as "cargo Code"). But the Code was repealed on May 30, 2016, leaving a legal gap in the actual carrier system. In this case, the author analyzes the impossibility of solving the deficiency of the actual carrier system through the current law, discusses that the actual carrier system needs to be legislated urgently, and finally puts forward that the original cargo Code and the Maritime Law should be taken as the original model. In the future Civil Code, we can reconstruct the actual carrier system from three aspects: the actual carrier's meaning, the right and the obligation and the responsibility, in order to solve the problem of the lack of the actual carrier system in the domestic waterway freight transport. It is beneficial to the development of domestic shipping transportation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳正棟;;淺析我國實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度的完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年15期

2 歐陽Z，

本文編號(hào)：2369027