【摘要】： 本文筆者以民法上留置權(quán)的含義、法律性質(zhì)、行使及效力的一般理論為指導(dǎo)，結(jié)合國際公約和國外立法的有關(guān)規(guī)定，系統(tǒng)地分析了我國立法在船舶留置權(quán)方面規(guī)定的不足，及因此可能給海運(yùn)實(shí)踐造成的不利影響。筆者以為，我國立法在船舶留置權(quán)的概念確定上應(yīng)變“封閉式”規(guī)定為“開放式”規(guī)定，擴(kuò)大船舶留置權(quán)所擔(dān)保的債權(quán)范圍，以明確權(quán)利性質(zhì)，增強(qiáng)實(shí)踐中的可操作性；在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步討論了船舶留置權(quán)的行使及實(shí)現(xiàn)，并對留置權(quán)的履行寬限期、受償順序及主債權(quán)訴訟時(shí)效屆滿留置權(quán)的行使進(jìn)行了詳述，認(rèn)為船舶留置權(quán)的履行寬限期應(yīng)不同于一般留置權(quán)，較之要為嚴(yán)格；且在船舶留置權(quán)行使主體擴(kuò)大的前提下，就船舶留置權(quán)與船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)、船舶抵押權(quán)及《海商法》第25條第2款所規(guī)定的船舶留置權(quán)的序位作了排列，，將船舶留置權(quán)排在船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)之后、船舶抵押權(quán)之前受償，存在數(shù)個(gè)留置權(quán)的，以直接占有的優(yōu)先受償。最后，筆者提出立法建議：一是在《海商議》中擴(kuò)大船舶留置權(quán)擔(dān)保的債權(quán)范圍；二是在《海商法》中增加對船舶留置權(quán)行使的規(guī)定，以使權(quán)利人更好地保護(hù)自己的權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the general theory of the meaning, legal nature, exercise and validity of the lien in civil law, the author systematically analyzes the deficiency of the provisions of Chinese legislation in the aspect of ship lien, in combination with the relevant provisions of international conventions and foreign legislation. And the possible adverse effects on maritime practice as a result. The author thinks that the legislation of our country should deal with the "closed" stipulation on the definition of the ship lien, expand the scope of the creditor's rights guaranteed by the ship lien, so as to clarify the nature of the right and enhance the operability in practice. On this basis, the paper further discusses the exercise and realization of the lien on ships, and details the grace period of the lien, the order of payment and the exercise of the lien upon the expiration of the limitation period of action of the principal creditor's rights. The author thinks that the grace period of the ship lien should be different from the general lien and be more strict than the common lien. On the premise of the expansion of the main body of the exercise of the ship lien, the order of the ship lien, the ship mortgage and the ship lien stipulated in Article 25, paragraph 2, of the Maritime Law is arranged. If the lien of a ship is placed after the lien of the ship and the ship is repaid before the mortgage of the ship, if there are several liens, the priority shall be the one in direct possession. Finally, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions: first, to expand the scope of the creditor's rights to guarantee the lien of ships in the Sea negotiation; second, to add the provisions on the exercise of the lien of ships in Maritime Law, so as to make the obligee better protect his rights and interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2001
【分類號】：D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃嘎;船舶留置權(quán)相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2337245