【摘要】：精神損害賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則在我國(guó)法律中沒有明確的規(guī)定,學(xué)說(shuō)上也有多種爭(zhēng)論。精神損害賠償案件紛紜復(fù)雜,大量的案件是很難援引現(xiàn)行的具體規(guī)定來(lái)處理的,借助歸責(zé)原則,司法人員就可以正確處理精神損害賠償案件,制裁各種精神損害侵權(quán)行為,實(shí)行對(duì)人身權(quán)的充分保護(hù)。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段精神損害賠償法律尚不完善的情況下,充分發(fā)揮歸責(zé)原則的這種功能,尤為重要。基于此,本文在此對(duì)精神損害賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則作了一次嘗試性的研究,試圖將紛繁雜亂精神損害賠償歸責(zé)原則整合為一個(gè)具有邏輯聯(lián)系的體系。希望通過(guò)本文的論述,能夠?yàn)檫M(jìn)一步完善精神損害賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則在司法實(shí)踐中的應(yīng)用提供理論依據(jù),使其更加符合我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的實(shí)際,同時(shí)也更加順應(yīng)世界民商法發(fā)展的潮流。 目前,我國(guó)理論界關(guān)于精神損害賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則有兩種觀點(diǎn)占主導(dǎo)地位,一是認(rèn)為精神損害賠償應(yīng)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則,二是認(rèn)為精神損害賠償應(yīng)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則和無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。對(duì)此,本文認(rèn)為由于精神損害賠償可適用范圍的廣泛性和民事不法行為的多樣性,在精神損害賠償領(lǐng)域似不應(yīng)規(guī)定一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的歸責(zé)原則。在侵害精神性人格權(quán)、身份權(quán)的精神損害賠償中,可以適用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則歸責(zé)。在侵害物質(zhì)性人格權(quán)、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的精神損害賠償中,過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則、無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則、公平責(zé)任原則都有其適用的余地。 全文分為三大部分:引言、正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)。 在本文的引言中,主要介紹了本文選題的背景和目的。 本文正文分為四部分。 第一部分介紹了精神損害賠償?shù)闹饕拍�、客體、理論依據(jù),在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了精神損害賠償歸責(zé)原則的適用問題。 第二部分主要論述了過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的歷史沿革及精神損害賠償制度的形成和發(fā)展過(guò)程,過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則作為精神損害賠償基本歸責(zé)則原則的理論依據(jù),并從責(zé)任構(gòu)成、適用范圍、舉證責(zé)任等方面探討了精神損害賠償過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則的適用。最后論述了精神損害賠償過(guò)錯(cuò)推定原則是過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則運(yùn)用的一種特殊方式,介紹了應(yīng)當(dāng)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定原則來(lái)確定精神損害賠償責(zé)任的幾種特殊侵權(quán)行為,討論了精神損害賠償適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任原則的意義及局限。適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任原則來(lái)確定精神損害賠償責(zé)任的幾種特殊侵權(quán)行為主要包括:地下工作物致人物質(zhì)性人格權(quán)損害,建筑物及其他設(shè)施以及建筑物上的
[Abstract]:The principle of imputation of mental damage compensation is not clearly stipulated in Chinese law, and there are many arguments in theory. Mental damage compensation cases are complicated, a large number of cases are difficult to invoke the existing specific provisions to deal with, with the help of the principle of imputation, judicial personnel can correctly deal with mental damage compensation cases, sanction all kinds of violations of mental damage. Full protection of personal rights shall be carried out. It is very important to give full play to the function of imputation principle under the condition that the law of mental damage compensation is not perfect at present in our country. Based on this, this paper makes a tentative study on the principle of imputation of compensation for mental damage, and attempts to integrate the principle of imputation of compensation for mental damage into a system with logical connection. It is hoped that this paper can provide a theoretical basis for the further improvement of the application of the principle of imputation of mental damage compensation in judicial practice, and make it more in line with the reality of our socialist market economy. At the same time, it also conforms to the trend of the development of the world civil and commercial law. At present, there are two dominant views on the principle of imputation of mental damage compensation in our country. One is that the principle of fault liability should be applied to the compensation for mental damage. Secondly, the principle of fault liability and non-fault liability should be applied to mental damage compensation. In view of this, this paper holds that due to the wide scope of application of mental damage compensation and the diversity of civil illegal acts, it seems that a unified imputation principle should not be stipulated in the field of mental damage compensation. The principle of liability for fault can be applied in the compensation for spiritual damage to the right of spiritual personality and identity. The principle of fault liability, the principle of no-fault liability and the principle of fair liability have their own scope of application in the compensation for spiritual damage caused by infringement of material personality rights and property rights. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the introduction of this paper, it mainly introduces the background and purpose of this paper. The text of this paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the main concept, object and theoretical basis of mental damage compensation, and puts forward the application of the principle of imputation of mental damage compensation. The second part mainly discusses the historical evolution of the principle of fault liability and the formation and development of the system of compensation for mental damage. The principle of fault liability is the theoretical basis of the basic principle of imputation of compensation for mental damage, and it is based on the constitution of liability and the scope of application. The application of the principle of fault liability for mental damage compensation is discussed in the aspects of burden of proof. Finally, this paper discusses that the principle of presumption of fault in compensation for mental damage is a special way of applying the principle of fault liability, and introduces several special tort acts in which the principle of presumption of fault should be applied to determine the liability for compensation for mental damage. This paper discusses the significance and limitation of applying the principle of presumption of fault liability to mental damage compensation. Several special tort acts which apply the principle of presumption of fault liability to determine the liability for moral damage mainly include: damage to the material personality rights caused by underground work, buildings and other facilities and buildings
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D913

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 莊群;鐵路交通事故損害賠償研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2257745