【摘要】：關(guān)于控制權(quán)的內(nèi)容、性質(zhì)、主體及行使等問題，目前學(xué)界頗有爭議。本文以UNCITRAL運輸法草案中控制權(quán)的規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合各國現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，對國際海上貨物運輸中的控制權(quán)問題進行研究分析，提出如下觀點： 第一，控制權(quán)是指在運輸過程中，在承運人責(zé)任期間內(nèi)，依據(jù)運輸合同，指示締約承運人對貨物實施某種行為的權(quán)利。具體包括：A．依據(jù)運輸合同條款，對貨物作出指示及修改指示(不構(gòu)成對運輸合同的根本變更)；B．中止運輸；C．貨物到達(dá)目的地前要求交付貨物；D．改變收貨人。該權(quán)利的規(guī)定不但適用于簽發(fā)傳統(tǒng)提單的運輸，而且適用于簽發(fā)電子提單和海運單的情況。 第二，在有關(guān)控制權(quán)的屬性的諸多學(xué)說中，筆者支持請求權(quán)說，且認(rèn)為控制權(quán)屬債上請求權(quán)。 第三，本文討論的是國際海上貨物運輸中的控制權(quán)，通過比較它與其他運輸方式下的貨物控制權(quán)、與中途停運權(quán)、與《合同法》第308條的關(guān)系，更加明確了控制權(quán)的特點。 第四，，由于海上貨物運輸有其特殊性，控制權(quán)的行使主體、行使方法和喪失原因則根據(jù)是否簽發(fā)可轉(zhuǎn)讓的運輸單證而不同，且控制權(quán)的行使以指示具有被執(zhí)行的合理可能為前提。 最后，本文根據(jù)我國目前的相關(guān)立法現(xiàn)狀，建議《海商法》中增加控制權(quán)的完整規(guī)定；建議規(guī)定貨物運輸合同基本條款的格式，以避免糾紛；建議我國法院進一步承認(rèn)承托雙方當(dāng)事人的保函的效力。
[Abstract]:The content, nature, subject and exercise of the right of control are controversial. Based on the regulation of the right of control in the draft of the UNCITRAL Transport Law, this paper studies and analyzes the control rights in the international carriage of goods by sea in combination with the relevant laws and regulations of various countries. The following points are raised: first, the right of control refers to the contract of carriage during the course of carriage, during the period of the carrier's responsibility, The right to instruct the contracting carrier to perform an act in respect of the goods. Specific include: A. under the terms of the contract of carriage, give instructions to the goods and modify instructions (which do not constitute a fundamental change to the contract of carriage) B. stop the shipment and request delivery of the goods before they arrive at their destination. Change the consignee. This right applies not only to the issue of traditional bills of lading, but also to the issuance of electronic bills of lading and sea waybills. Secondly, in many theories about the attribute of control right, the author supports the claim right theory, and holds that the control right belongs to the claim right on debt. Thirdly, this paper discusses the right of control in the international carriage of goods by sea. By comparing it with the right of control of goods under other modes of transport, with the right of stoppage and with article 308 of the contract Law, the characteristics of the right of control are more clearly defined. Fourthly, because of the particularity of the carriage of goods by sea, the exercise of the right of control, the method of exercise and the reasons for its loss are different depending on whether a negotiable transport document is issued, And the exercise of the right of control is based on the indication that there is a reasonable possibility to be executed. Finally, according to the current legislative situation of our country, this paper suggests that the complete regulation of the right of control should be added to the Maritime Law, and the form of the basic clauses of the contract of carriage of goods should be stipulated in order to avoid disputes. It is suggested that the court of our country further recognize the validity of the guarantee of both parties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：D996.19

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 楊景章;論UNCITRAL運輸法草案中的控制權(quán)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

2 李曉霞;海運貨物控制權(quán)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

3 劉超;海運貨物控制權(quán)之研究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2006年

4 郝靜;國際海運貨物控制權(quán)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

5 董水清;結(jié)合海上貨物運輸合同談海上貨物控制權(quán)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號：2243928