【摘要】：商會糾紛解決機(jī)制也就是由商會這種民間社會團(tuán)體解決糾紛的理念、規(guī)則、制度、方法和組織機(jī)構(gòu)及活動(dòng)等構(gòu)成的體系。商業(yè)領(lǐng)域是公認(rèn)的自治程度最高的社會領(lǐng)域,解決商事糾紛是早期東西方地方商會和行業(yè)商會的基本活動(dòng),也是其自治規(guī)則的一種“司法實(shí)踐”。近現(xiàn)代中國商會解決商事糾紛的實(shí)踐經(jīng)歷了從形成到規(guī)范,然后隨現(xiàn)代法制的形成而衰落的過程。 我國歷來強(qiáng)調(diào)運(yùn)用民事訴訟程序解決商事糾紛,沒有獨(dú)立的商事審判制度,過分著眼于民、商事糾紛都是平等主體之間的社會關(guān)系共性的把握,忽略了商事糾紛與商事糾紛解決機(jī)制的特殊性以及商法的獨(dú)立品格,出現(xiàn)了不利于糾紛解決的現(xiàn)象。基于此,本文通過對商會糾紛解決機(jī)制的歷史沿革與現(xiàn)狀的把握,在對商事糾紛和商事糾紛解決機(jī)制的特殊性分析的基礎(chǔ)上,指出其他糾紛解決方式在解決商事糾紛方面的功能局限,進(jìn)而提出商會糾紛解決機(jī)制在助力構(gòu)建行業(yè)規(guī)范、緩解糾紛解決的剛性化、緩和情感對立、注重商事習(xí)慣和慣例、強(qiáng)調(diào)對專業(yè)技術(shù)性規(guī)范的運(yùn)用等方面具有不可替代的優(yōu)勢,對于解決日益復(fù)雜、多發(fā)的商事糾紛有獨(dú)特價(jià)值。賦予商會解決商事糾紛的職能,是商會自治性的延伸,也符合當(dāng)下商事糾紛解決的制度性需求。 目前雖然我國商會組織較多,但由于其自治性的缺失和法律規(guī)定不明確,缺乏明確的職能界定和相應(yīng)權(quán)力,在解決糾紛方面發(fā)揮功能有限,因而商會解決商事糾紛的制度成熟性取決于商會自身的組織建設(shè)和規(guī)范發(fā)展。本文建議,除了在法律層面對商會職能予以明確定位與規(guī)范,和在現(xiàn)實(shí)層面對商會自治予以鼓勵(lì)和引導(dǎo)外,還應(yīng)對其效力、制度保障、救濟(jì)等方面進(jìn)行一系列的制度設(shè)計(jì),從而完善商會糾紛解決機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The dispute resolution mechanism of chamber of commerce is a system of ideas, rules, systems, methods, organizations and activities of civil society organizations such as chambers of commerce. The commercial field is recognized as the social field with the highest degree of autonomy. The settlement of commercial disputes is the basic activity of the local chambers of commerce and trade chambers of the early East and West, and is also a kind of "judicial practice" of its autonomy rules. The practice of Chinese Chamber of Commerce in solving commercial disputes experienced from formation to norm, then declined with the formation of modern legal system. Our country has always emphasized the use of civil procedure to solve commercial disputes, there is no independent commercial trial system, too much attention to the people, commercial disputes are equal subjects of social relations between the common grasp. Ignoring the particularity of commercial dispute and the settlement mechanism of commercial dispute and the independent character of commercial law, the phenomenon is unfavorable to the settlement of disputes. Based on this, this paper analyzes the particularity of the settlement mechanism of commercial disputes and commercial disputes on the basis of grasping the historical evolution and present situation of the dispute resolution mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce, and on the basis of the analysis of the particularity of the settlement mechanism of commercial disputes and commercial disputes. The paper points out the functional limitations of other dispute resolution methods in resolving commercial disputes, and then points out that the dispute resolution mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce can help to construct industry norms, ease the rigidity of dispute resolution, ease the emotional antagonism, and pay attention to commercial habits and practices. It emphasizes the irreplaceable advantage in the application of professional technical norms, which is of unique value in solving the increasingly complex and frequent commercial disputes. Giving the Chamber of Commerce the function of resolving commercial disputes is an extension of its autonomy and meets the needs of the current commercial dispute resolution system. At present, although there are many chambers of commerce in our country, due to their lack of autonomy and unclear legal provisions, lack of clear definition of functions and corresponding powers, they play a limited role in the settlement of disputes. Therefore, the system maturity of the Chamber of Commerce in resolving commercial disputes depends on its own organizational construction and normative development. This paper suggests that in addition to clearly positioning and standardizing the functions of the Chamber of Commerce at the legal level and encouraging and guiding the autonomy of the Chamber of Commerce in the practical level, it should also carry out a series of system designs on its effectiveness, system protection, relief, etc. In order to improve the Chamber of Commerce dispute resolution mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張啟耀;崔明霞;黃紅蓮;;清末商會調(diào)理經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛的性質(zhì)及評價(jià)[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

2 楊郁;;晉商商事糾紛解決機(jī)制研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2010年05期

3 周荃;;人民法院委托行業(yè)協(xié)會調(diào)解的實(shí)踐及其規(guī)制——以金融糾紛調(diào)解為視角[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

4 趙萬一;;商法的獨(dú)立性與商事審判的獨(dú)立化[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年01期

5 江蘇省高級人民法院"和諧社會與民事制度創(chuàng)新"課題組;;民事案件與商事案件適用訴訟調(diào)解的區(qū)分研究[J];法律適用;2008年11期

6 符喜;林珊;;論國際商會糾紛解決體系之“ADR”制度[J];法制與社會;2008年25期

7 陳剩勇,馬斌;溫州民間商會:自主治理的制度分析——溫州服裝商會的典型研究[J];管理世界;2004年12期

8 余冬愛;;民、商區(qū)分原則下的商事審判理念探析[J];人民司法;2011年03期

9 談蕭;;制度變遷中的自治秩序——以近代以來中國商會自治規(guī)則為例[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

10 常健;;清末民初商會裁判制度:法律形成與特點(diǎn)解析[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 穆子礪;論中國商事調(diào)解制度之構(gòu)建[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 許曉俊;國際商事調(diào)解協(xié)議與和解協(xié)議法律效力問題研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

2 周易;國際商事領(lǐng)域的ADR方法研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2237170