【摘要】：合同自由是一個討論已久的問題,但以往人們的討論只停留在民事領(lǐng)域,對商事合同的關(guān)注較少,更沒有注意到商事合同有其獨(dú)特的目標(biāo)追求和價值取向�？紤]到我國是民商合一的國家,人們習(xí)慣用民事合同規(guī)則來調(diào)整商事合同,造成商事合同調(diào)節(jié)失范,更不利于商事規(guī)則的建立和商事交易的繁榮。本文從一個商事案件出發(fā),分析了商事合同自由不充分的原因,指出了商事合同充分自由的必要性,并為完善我國商事合同自由制度提供新的建議。第一部分問題的提出。該部分引入了一個商事案例,通過對該案例的介紹,提煉出爭議的問題,指出商事合同與民事合同在注意義務(wù)、價值取向、瑕疵分類以及違約責(zé)任等諸多方面都存在著差異。接著對該爭議的問題進(jìn)行分析,形成自己的思考,為下文的論述作鋪墊。第二部分主要分析商事合同不充分自由的原因,指出商事合同與民事合同混淆、商事合同價值目標(biāo)模糊、商主體營利性保護(hù)不力等因素限制了商事合同的充分自由。這一部分是緊接上一部分的,是對上一部分提出問題的原因分析。在明確了問題產(chǎn)生的原因之后,才能更好地解決問題。第三部分商事合同充分自由的合理性,主要論述了商事合同為何需要充分自由。該段指出合同充分的自由是基于商事合同的本質(zhì),是商事合同價值目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)的需要,也是保護(hù)商人的營利性,充分尊重商主體意思表示的要求。第四部分商事合同自由的制度完善,該部分屬于實(shí)施措施部分。商事合同充分自由有如此豐富的意義,因此我們需要采取一定措施來促進(jìn)商事合同自由。這些措施主要包括了確立商法規(guī)則優(yōu)先適用的原則、充分尊重當(dāng)事人意思自治、確立商事效率之原則、增強(qiáng)對商事合同營利性的保護(hù)等,該類措施是在第二部分原因分析的基礎(chǔ)之上提出的,也是對第一部分提出問題的解決。
[Abstract]:Freedom of contract is a long-discussed issue, but in the past people only stay in the civil sphere of discussion, less attention to commercial contracts, not to mention that commercial contracts have its unique goal pursuit and value orientation. This article starts from a commercial case, analyzes the causes of insufficient freedom of commercial contract, points out the necessity of full freedom of commercial contract, and provides new suggestions for perfecting the system of freedom of commercial contract in China. This part introduces a commercial case, through the introduction of the case, extracts the controversial issues, pointing out that commercial contracts and civil contracts in the duty of care, value orientation, classification of defects and liability for breach of contract and many other aspects of the differences. Then the controversial issues are analyzed, forming their own thinking, for the following exposition. The second part mainly analyzes the reasons for the inadequate freedom of commercial contracts, pointing out that the confusion between commercial contracts and civil contracts, the ambiguity of the value objectives of commercial contracts, the inadequate protection of the profitability of commercial subjects and other factors restrict the full freedom of commercial contracts. In the third part, the rationality of full freedom of commercial contract is mainly discussed. This paragraph points out that full freedom of contract is based on the nature of commercial contract, the realization of the value goal of commercial contract and the protection of businessmen. The fourth part is the perfection of the system of freedom of commercial contract, which belongs to the part of implementing measures. The full freedom of commercial contract has so rich significance that we need to take certain measures to promote the freedom of commercial contract. Applicable principles, full respect for the party autonomy, establish the principle of commercial efficiency, enhance the protection of commercial contracts for profit, such measures are put forward on the basis of the analysis of the reasons in the second part, but also the first part of the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施揚(yáng);;論商事合同中“意思”與“表示”的差異[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2007年33期

2 樊濤;;我國商事合同制度的解析與重構(gòu)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2008年06期

3 梁開斌;;商事合同糾紛審判對象范圍的界定[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年05期

4 姜巖;;論商事合同“合意瑕疵”的救濟(jì)[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2009年07期

5 張宇;張睿;;關(guān)于建構(gòu)我國商事合同制度的路徑構(gòu)想[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2011年02期

6 葉敏;;論商事合同解除的法律后果[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年11期

7 王永新;;《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》與《國際商事合同通則》之比較[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2009年05期

8 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于審理涉外民事或商事合同糾紛案件法律適用若干問題的規(guī)定[J];Beijing Review;2008年19期

9 曹守f，

本文編號：2230223