【摘要】：海上履約方是UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法草案中獨(dú)具特色的一項(xiàng)法律制度,這一概念的設(shè)立,對(duì)于澄清復(fù)雜的門到門國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸法律關(guān)系中的責(zé)任主體,確定履行承運(yùn)人義務(wù)的參與方的責(zé)任,具有重要的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。但迄今為止,關(guān)于海上履約方的立法還不夠完善,海上履約方承擔(dān)責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)上存在分歧,實(shí)踐中尚存在很多問(wèn)題亟需解決。本文的寫作目的就是系統(tǒng)地研究海上履約方的責(zé)任制度。 本文共分為五章:第1章是關(guān)于海上履約方設(shè)立背景的研究,具體介紹了履約方的國(guó)際立法現(xiàn)狀和草案適用范圍對(duì)海上履約方的范疇的影響。第2章是關(guān)于海上履約方及其相關(guān)定義的分析,主要對(duì)履約方的概念的發(fā)展過(guò)程、海上履約方的涵義,以及與其相關(guān)定義加以分析和闡述。第3章是關(guān)于海上履約方承擔(dān)責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)研究,首先對(duì)海上履約方承擔(dān)責(zé)任的一般屬性進(jìn)行分析,分別從海上履約方與貨物權(quán)利人和承運(yùn)人兩個(gè)角度,對(duì)其責(zé)任的法定性、侵權(quán)性和連帶性進(jìn)行分析,其次引入不真正連帶債務(wù)的概念,討論不真正連帶債務(wù)理論對(duì)海上履約方的適用。第4章是研究海上履約方的責(zé)任,結(jié)合草案的規(guī)定,主要對(duì)海上履約方的責(zé)任基礎(chǔ)、責(zé)任期間、責(zé)任限制進(jìn)行討論。第5章是對(duì)海上履約方的評(píng)價(jià)及對(duì)我國(guó)海商法的借鑒。本章首先對(duì)草案的價(jià)值,海上履約方存在的意義及缺陷進(jìn)行了闡述,其次,針對(duì)草案與我國(guó)海商法的不同之處,分析我國(guó)海商法的不足,并提出修改意見(jiàn)。 我國(guó)海商法中的實(shí)際承運(yùn)人制度與草案的海上履約方制度雖然在表述上有所差異,但在立法目的上是相同的,因此,作者希望本文能對(duì)我國(guó)完善關(guān)于實(shí)際承運(yùn)人的立法帶來(lái)一些啟示和參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Maritime performing party is a unique legal system in the draft of UNCITRAL Transport Law. The establishment of this concept can clarify the subject of responsibility in the complicated legal relationship of door-to-door international carriage of goods by sea. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to determine the responsibility of the parties involved in fulfilling the carrier's obligations. However, up to now, the legislation on maritime performing party is not perfect, and there are differences on the basis of the theory that the maritime performing party bears responsibility, and there are still many problems to be solved in practice. The purpose of this paper is to systematically study the liability system of maritime performing parties. This paper is divided into five chapters: chapter 1 is a study on the background of the establishment of maritime performing party. It introduces the current situation of international legislation of the performing party and the influence of the scope of application of the draft on the scope of maritime performing party. The second chapter is about the analysis of maritime performing party and its related definitions, mainly to the development process of the concept of performing party, the meaning of maritime performing party, and its related definitions. The third chapter is the theoretical basis of the maritime performing party to bear responsibility, first of all, the general nature of the maritime performing party to bear responsibility is analyzed, respectively from the maritime performing party and cargo obligee and carrier, the legal nature of their liability. This paper analyzes the tort and joint liability, and then introduces the concept of unreal joint and several obligations, and discusses the application of the theory of unreal joint and several obligations to maritime performing parties. The fourth chapter is to study the liability of maritime performing party, combined with the provisions of the draft, mainly discusses the liability basis, liability period, liability limitation of maritime performing party. Chapter 5 is the evaluation of maritime performing party and the reference to our maritime law. In this chapter, the value of the draft, the significance and defects of the maritime performing party are expounded. Secondly, in view of the differences between the draft and the maritime law of our country, this chapter analyzes the shortcomings of the draft and puts forward some suggestions to amend it. The actual carrier system in China's maritime law is different from the maritime performing party system in the draft, but the legislative purpose is the same. The author hopes that this paper can bring some enlightenment and reference value to our country to perfect the legislation on actual carrier.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陽(yáng)雪雅;;論不真正連帶責(zé)任獨(dú)立性的缺失——兼評(píng)新制定的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2011年05期

2 武之歌;玄玉寶;;違約賠償責(zé)任的構(gòu)成及不真正連帶責(zé)任的份額化處理[J];人民司法;2011年02期

3 陳清;;論我國(guó)侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];理論月刊;2011年09期

4 羅佳意;;試論我國(guó)房屋登記賠償責(zé)任的分擔(dān)機(jī)制——解讀《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理房屋登記案件若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定》[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2011年11期

5 孫培賢;;虛假陳述侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)評(píng)析及完善[J];證券法苑;2010年02期

6 g，

本文編號(hào)：2196471