【摘要】： 如何解決有限責(zé)任公司因其閉鎖性而引致的股東內(nèi)部沖突是各國法律感覺頗為棘手的問題,其中之一就是當(dāng)公司內(nèi)部出現(xiàn)“離心股東”時公司或其他股東應(yīng)如何解決的問題。為此,各國在法律實踐的基礎(chǔ)上形成了一項起初作為司法解散替代制度的法律制度——除名權(quán)法律制度。因其滿足了社會的需求,逐步發(fā)展成為解決公司股東內(nèi)部沖突的一項重要制度而在國外得以蓬勃發(fā)展。在我國因?qū)嵺`和研究起步較晚,該制度才略具雛形,然我國現(xiàn)實亦迫切需要該制度以解決有限責(zé)任公司股東內(nèi)部沖突問題。因此筆者以回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實需要為目的,綜合運用實證分析法、歷史分析法、比較分析法等研究方法對除名權(quán)法律制度進(jìn)行較為深入的研究,希望能夠構(gòu)建出我國的有限責(zé)任公司股東除名權(quán)法律制度。 本文分為引言、正文和結(jié)論三個部分: 在引言中,提出了我國建立有限責(zé)任公司股東除名權(quán)法律制度是現(xiàn)實的需要,研究該問題對于解決有限責(zé)任公司中“離心股東”問題具有重要意義。并梳理了我國的研究現(xiàn)狀,明確了進(jìn)一步研究的方向。 正文部分分為四章。第一章從除名權(quán)所關(guān)涉的基本問題出發(fā)論述了除名權(quán)法律制度的基本范疇和除名權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性,將其與我國現(xiàn)存的公司法解決公司內(nèi)部沖突的制度相比較,指出除名權(quán)是具有特殊存在價值的一項解決股東內(nèi)部沖突的重要制度,而且在制度功能上有其他相關(guān)制度所無法比擬的優(yōu)勢,有利于平衡公司、股東之間和其他利益相關(guān)者之間的利益。當(dāng)然,任何一項制度的構(gòu)建必須有其理論基礎(chǔ),第二章即從基本理論層面上探討了除名權(quán)能夠成為獨立制度的理論基礎(chǔ),認(rèn)為單一理論支持一項制度可能會顯得理論基礎(chǔ)單薄和片面,所以從民法、商法和公司法三個層面上提出除名權(quán)法律制度構(gòu)建的理論基礎(chǔ),以從各個角度來證明除名權(quán)法律制度的構(gòu)建是有其深厚理論基礎(chǔ)的。公司形態(tài)的日益國際化,使其制度在各國間有很大的相似性和可借鑒性,因此國外的先進(jìn)制度經(jīng)驗不可能不予考慮。因此,第三章通過對大陸法系的典型國家德國和英美法系的典型國家美國的相關(guān)制度及其實踐進(jìn)行比較分析,證成了除名權(quán)法律制度是契合時代要求和順應(yīng)公司法發(fā)展趨勢的一項解決股東內(nèi)部沖突的重要制度。第四章在借鑒德國和美國制度經(jīng)驗的情況下,結(jié)合我國的現(xiàn)實,分別從除名權(quán)法律制度的實體制度層面和程序制度層面進(jìn)行分析并提出了自己的制度構(gòu)建設(shè)想,期望能夠盡可能詳盡的為我國有限責(zé)任公司股東內(nèi)部沖突的解決提供較為可行的制度——除名權(quán)法律制度。 結(jié)論部分對全文進(jìn)行了總結(jié),認(rèn)為我國法律應(yīng)該回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實的需求,盡快就有限責(zé)任公司股東除名權(quán)法律制度進(jìn)行立法,如果短期內(nèi)立法不能實現(xiàn),也應(yīng)通過立法解釋的方式來滿足現(xiàn)實的需求。
[Abstract]:How to solve the internal conflict of shareholders caused by the locking of limited liability company is a thorny problem in various countries, one of which is how to solve the problem that the company or other shareholders should solve when there are "centrifugal shareholders" in the company. Therefore, on the basis of legal practice, countries have formed a legal system, the right of delisting, which was used as a substitute system for judicial dissolution. Because it meets the needs of the society, it has gradually developed into an important system to solve the conflict among the shareholders of the company and has developed vigorously in foreign countries. Because of the late start of practice and research in our country, the system has a rudimentary form, but the reality of our country also urgently needs the system to solve the internal conflict of shareholders of limited liability company. Therefore, in order to respond to the needs of reality, the author comprehensively uses empirical analysis, historical analysis, comparative analysis and other research methods to deeply study the legal system of delisting right. The author hopes to construct the legal system of shareholder's delisting right of limited liability company in our country. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion: in the introduction, it is put forward that it is necessary to establish the legal system of shareholder's delisting right of limited liability company in our country. The study of this problem is of great significance to solve the problem of "centrifugal shareholders" in limited liability companies. And combed our country's research present situation, has defined the further research direction. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the basic category of the legal system of delisting right and the property of the right of delisting from the basic problems involved in the right of delisting, and compares it with the existing system of corporate law in our country to resolve the internal conflict of the company. It is pointed out that the right of delisting is an important system with special existence value to resolve the conflict among shareholders, and has the advantage that other relative systems can not compare in the system function, which is beneficial to balance the company. Interests between shareholders and other stakeholders. Of course, the construction of any system must have its theoretical basis, the second chapter is from the basic theoretical level to explore the delisting right can become the theoretical basis of the independent system. It is considered that a single theory supporting a system may appear as a weak and one-sided theoretical basis, so the theoretical basis of the legal system of the right to remove from the law is put forward from the three levels of civil law, commercial law and company law. It is proved from various angles that the legal system of delisting right has its profound theoretical foundation. With the increasing internationalization of corporate form, its system has great similarity and reference among countries, so the advanced institutional experience of foreign countries can not be ignored. Therefore, the third chapter makes a comparative analysis of the relevant systems and practices of Germany, a typical country of the continental law system, and the United States, a typical country of the common law system. It is an important system to solve the internal conflict of shareholders in accordance with the requirements of the times and the trend of company law. In the fourth chapter, based on the experience of Germany and the United States, combined with the reality of our country, this chapter analyzes the legal system of delisting right from the substantive system level and the procedural system level, and puts forward its own system construction ideas. The author hopes to provide a more feasible system-the legal system of the right of delisting for the resolution of the conflict among shareholders of the limited liability company in our country as much as possible. The conclusion part summarizes the full text, thinks our country law should respond to the realistic demand, as soon as possible carries on the legislation to the limited liability company shareholder delisting right legal system, if the legislation cannot be realized in the short term, We should also meet the actual needs by means of legislative interpretation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 汪晨;;驅(qū)逐有限責(zé)任公司的“離心股東”——以構(gòu)建股東除名制度為核心[J];證券法苑;2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王穎;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

2 徐翔;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名規(guī)則研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

3 顧曉慧;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

4 費小麗;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名法律制度研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

5 楊海燕;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2012年

6 申峰;瑕疵出資股東的資格認(rèn)定研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2193627