【摘要】：海牙規(guī)則、海牙—維斯比規(guī)則和漢堡規(guī)則的并存，加之各國制定各自的海上貨物運輸法律，導致了國際海上貨物運輸法律統(tǒng)一的局面分崩離析。幸運的是，國際海事委員會(CMI)和聯(lián)合國國際貿(mào)易法委員會(UNCITRAL)并沒有忘記自己的職責所在，在他們的精誠合作和共同努力之下，運輸法草案(DraftInstrument on Transport Law)終于誕生。運輸法草案引進了數(shù)個全新的概念和制度，控制權(quán)就是其中之一。 本文主要是對海運貨物控制權(quán)問題進行研究和探討。除引言和結(jié)論之外，本文共分為五章。其中，引言部分對運輸法草案的出臺背景進行了粗略的描述，并對本文的主旨、內(nèi)容、研究方法、研究目的等問題做了簡要的介紹。第一章主要介紹控制權(quán)目前的立法情況。在論述海上貨物運輸法律的不統(tǒng)一現(xiàn)狀的基礎上，主要介紹運輸法草案的立法過程和對控制權(quán)的爭論這兩個問題，初步提出控制權(quán)的存在有其合理性的觀點。第二章是控制權(quán)的概述。首先，對運輸法草案中有關(guān)控制權(quán)的規(guī)定加以介紹和評論，提出了本文為控制權(quán)所下的定義，并作了簡單的說明。其次，本文對控制權(quán)的性質(zhì)加以辨析，認為控制權(quán)屬于實體權(quán)利、債權(quán)和形成權(quán)。再次，從現(xiàn)實和學理兩個角度，論述了控制權(quán)存在的必要性。第三章主要針對控制權(quán)行使的相關(guān)問題。首先，分三種情況討論了控制權(quán)權(quán)利的主體，并明確指出控制權(quán)的義務主體是承運人，實際承運人不是其義務主體的觀點。其次，指出控制權(quán)的客體是行為，批駁了其客體是物的觀點。再次，，討論了控制權(quán)的行使條件、方式和控制權(quán)的消滅等問題，提出了諸如放寬控制權(quán)的行使條件以更好地發(fā)揮其積極作用等觀點。在第四章中，在對中途停運權(quán)簡要介紹的基礎上，將控制權(quán)與中途停運權(quán)做了詳細的對比，指出了兩者的異同，以期對控制權(quán)有更深入的理解。第五章主要涉及的是我國控制權(quán)立法的問題。首先，對我國《合同法》和《海商法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定加以評論。在此基礎上，提出在我國法律中引入控制權(quán)的必要性。在論述了立法的總體思路和需要注意的問題后，提出了我國控制權(quán)立法具體條文的建議，并加以說明。最后的結(jié)論部分，對全文的內(nèi)容進行了簡單的總結(jié)。 在本文的論述中，多次運用比較分析的方法，將控制權(quán)與中途停運權(quán)作了詳
[Abstract]:The coexistence of the Hague rules, the Hague-Visby rules and the Hamburg rules, together with the enactment of their respective laws on the carriage of goods by sea, has led to the disintegration of the unification of the laws of the international carriage of goods by sea. Fortunately, the International Maritime Commission (CMI) and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) (UNCITRAL) did not forget their duty. Thanks to their sincere cooperation and joint efforts, the draft Transport Law (DraftInstrument on Transport Law) was finally born. Control is one of several new concepts and systems introduced in the draft Transport Law. This article is mainly to carry on the research and the discussion to the maritime cargo control right question. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper is divided into five chapters. Among them, the introduction describes the background of the draft transport law roughly, and makes a brief introduction to the main idea, content, research method, research purpose and so on. The first chapter mainly introduces the current legislative situation of the right of control. On the basis of discussing the disunity of the law of carriage of goods by sea, this paper mainly introduces the legislative process of the draft of the law of carriage and the dispute over the right of control, and puts forward the viewpoint that the existence of the right of control has its rationality. The second chapter is an overview of the right of control. First of all, the article introduces and comments on the provisions of the draft Transport Law concerning the right of control, puts forward the definition of the right of control in this paper, and gives a brief explanation. Secondly, this paper analyzes the nature of the right of control and thinks that the right of control belongs to substantive right, creditor's right and formative right. Thirdly, it discusses the necessity of the existence of control right from the point of view of reality and theory. The third chapter focuses on the relevant issues of the exercise of control rights. Firstly, the author discusses the subject of the right of control in three situations, and points out clearly that the subject of the obligation of control is the carrier, and the actual carrier is not the subject of the obligation. Secondly, the author points out that the object of control is behavior and refutes the view that object is substance. Thirdly, the paper discusses the conditions and methods of the exercise of the right of control and the elimination of the right of control, and puts forward some viewpoints such as relaxing the conditions for the exercise of the right of control in order to play its positive role better. In the fourth chapter, on the basis of a brief introduction to the right of stoppage, the author makes a detailed comparison between the right of control and the right of stoppage, and points out the similarities and differences between the two, in order to have a deeper understanding of the right of control. The fifth chapter mainly deals with the legislation of control right in our country. First of all, the relevant provisions of China's contract Law and Maritime Law are reviewed. On this basis, the necessity of introducing the right of control in Chinese law is put forward. After discussing the general idea of legislation and the problems needing attention, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the specific provisions of the legislation of the right of control in our country, and explains it. The last part of the conclusion, the full text of the content of a simple summary. In this paper, the control right and stoppage right are discussed in detail many times by using the method of comparative analysis.
【學位授予單位】：上海海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D923.6;D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 姚瑩;國際海上貨物運輸中的權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)讓制度研究[D];吉林大學;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 劉亦薇;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下的貨物控制權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年

2 姜琳;FOB貿(mào)易術(shù)語下賣方風險及其規(guī)避[D];大連海事大學;2013年

3 王延威;論海上貨物運輸中的貨物控制權(quán)[D];大連海事大學;2013年

本文編號：2193001