【摘要】： 《鹿特丹規(guī)則》創(chuàng)設(shè)單證托運(yùn)人,試圖為交付貨物的,尤其是FOB價(jià)格術(shù)語下的賣方,提供法律上的保障,以解決以往國際公約因規(guī)定不明而造成的沖突與爭議。通過分析單證托運(yùn)人的定義、權(quán)利、義務(wù)和責(zé)任,探討《鹿特丹規(guī)則》設(shè)置單證托運(yùn)人的合理性,以及單證托運(yùn)人的實(shí)踐可行性,為我國《海商法》的修改提供建議。運(yùn)用歷史研究、比較分析以及體系研究等方法,得出以下結(jié)論：(1)《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對單證托運(yùn)人的創(chuàng)設(shè)較為合理,要成為單證托運(yùn)人需滿足如下三個(gè)條件：第一,單證托運(yùn)人不是與承運(yùn)人訂立運(yùn)輸合同的人；第二,單證托運(yùn)人是在運(yùn)輸單證或電子運(yùn)輸記錄托運(yùn)人一欄中被具名為“托運(yùn)人”的人；第三,單證托運(yùn)人同意此種記載；(2)單證托運(yùn)人享有取得單證的權(quán)利、控制權(quán)以及提起訴訟等主要權(quán)利；(3)單證托運(yùn)人以(推定)過錯(cuò)責(zé)任為原則,以嚴(yán)格責(zé)任為例外,負(fù)有交付運(yùn)輸、危險(xiǎn)貨物說明和提供補(bǔ)充信息、指示及文件等主要義務(wù)；(4)我國《海商法》在修改時(shí)應(yīng)引入單證托運(yùn)人,但對單證托運(yùn)人權(quán)利、義務(wù)和責(zé)任的設(shè)置應(yīng)充分考慮我國法律及航運(yùn)現(xiàn)狀,符合我國利益。
[Abstract]:The Rotterdam rules create documentary shippers who attempt to provide legal safeguards for delivery of goods, especially for sellers under FOB terms, in order to resolve conflicts and disputes arising from unclear provisions in previous international conventions. By analyzing the definition, rights, obligations and responsibilities of the documentary shipper, this paper probes into the reasonableness of setting up the documentary shipper in the Rotterdam rules, and the practical feasibility of the documentary shipper, and provides some suggestions for the revision of the Maritime Law of China. By using the methods of historical research, comparative analysis and system research, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) the establishment of the document shipper in Rotterdam rules is more reasonable, and the following three conditions must be satisfied to become a document shipper: first, The documentary shipper is not a person who has entered into a contract of carriage with the carrier; second, the documentary shipper is a person named "shipper" in the column shipper of the transport document or electronic transport record; and third, the documentary shipper agrees to such a record; (2) the documentary shipper has the main rights of obtaining the document, the right of control and the filing of an action; (3) the documentary shipper is (presumed) liable for fault, with the exception of strict liability, and has the obligation to deliver for carriage, Main obligations such as description of dangerous goods and the provision of supplementary information, instructions and documents; (4) the amendment of our Maritime Code shall introduce the documentary shipper, but shall have the right to the documentary shipper, The establishment of obligation and responsibility should fully consider the present situation of our country's law and shipping, which is in our country's interest.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D996.19

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許小鳳;;交貨托運(yùn)人及其法律問題[J];法制與社會;2012年32期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 高佳璐;論《鹿特丹規(guī)則》單證托運(yùn)人制度及對FOB我國賣方的影響[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

2 周潔;單證托運(yùn)人法律制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

3 王玉德;我國《海商法》托運(yùn)人識別及其權(quán)利義務(wù)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

4 張婉婷;論海上危險(xiǎn)貨物運(yùn)輸中托運(yùn)人的法律責(zé)任[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2119982