本文選題：無(wú)人提貨 + 民事責(zé)任　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 無(wú)人提領(lǐng)已經(jīng)運(yùn)抵目的港的貨物,目前在國(guó)際海運(yùn)尤其是集裝箱班輪運(yùn)輸中屢見不鮮,因此給當(dāng)事人尤其是承運(yùn)人帶來(lái)嚴(yán)重的損害,也造成社會(huì)財(cái)富的巨大浪費(fèi)。由于目的港無(wú)人提貨,承運(yùn)人的集裝箱長(zhǎng)期被占用,還需支付垃圾處理費(fèi)、堆存費(fèi)、插電費(fèi)等額外費(fèi)用,在此期間,承運(yùn)人為使集裝箱早日騰空,奔走于托運(yùn)人與收貨人之間,究竟誰(shuí)應(yīng)承擔(dān)責(zé)任使承運(yùn)人難以決斷。圍繞目的港無(wú)人提貨相關(guān)的法律問(wèn)題研究較少,在集裝箱班輪運(yùn)輸已經(jīng)成為國(guó)際海運(yùn)最重要的運(yùn)輸方式時(shí),這一問(wèn)題已經(jīng)到了必須引起高度重視的地步,為此,需認(rèn)真研究目的港無(wú)人提貨的民事責(zé)任。 論文以實(shí)際調(diào)研中取得的第一手材料為依據(jù),根據(jù)目的港無(wú)人提貨的原因及因此給運(yùn)輸各方造成的損害,闡述了研究目的港無(wú)人提貨民事責(zé)任這一課題的重要意義;通過(guò)分析海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同的特征及承運(yùn)人、托運(yùn)人、收貨人之間的法律關(guān)系,研究了目的港無(wú)人提貨的權(quán)利主體,分析了承運(yùn)人作為權(quán)利主體、實(shí)際承運(yùn)人不能作為權(quán)利主體的依據(jù);研究了目的港無(wú)人提貨的責(zé)任主體,分析了訂約托運(yùn)人、記名交貨托運(yùn)人及收貨人作為責(zé)任主體的依據(jù);指出了“托運(yùn)人”定義、“收貨人目的港強(qiáng)制性提貨義務(wù)”、“《海商法》與《海關(guān)法》的規(guī)定不協(xié)調(diào)一致”等局限性,提出了《海商法》相關(guān)條款的完善方向。 最后,論文認(rèn)為,目的港無(wú)人提貨是一種違約責(zé)任,承運(yùn)人理所當(dāng)然享受可以索賠損失的權(quán)利,訂約托運(yùn)人、記名交貨托運(yùn)人及收貨人都有可能成為承運(yùn)人權(quán)利行使的對(duì)象;建議通過(guò)立法或司法解釋的方式確立“單證托運(yùn)人”、“收貨人附條件提貨義務(wù)”、“《海商法》與《海關(guān)法》的規(guī)定協(xié)調(diào)一致”等原則,以解決目的港無(wú)人提貨這一法律問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:No one has claimed the goods that have arrived at the port of destination, which is common in international shipping, especially in container liner shipping, which causes serious damage to the parties, especially the carrier, and also causes a huge waste of social wealth. The carrier's containers are occupied for a long time because of the unpicked cargo at the port of destination, and additional expenses such as garbage disposal fee, storage fee and electricity bill are also paid. In the meantime, the carrier, in order to make the container empty as soon as possible, travels between the shipper and the consignee. Who should bear the responsibility makes it difficult for the carrier to decide. There are few studies on the legal issues related to the uncollected cargo from the port of destination. When container liner shipping has become the most important mode of international maritime transport, this problem has reached the point where it must be highly valued. It is necessary to study the civil liability of the port of destination. Based on the firsthand materials obtained in the actual investigation and according to the causes of the unsolicited goods in the port of destination and the damage caused to the parties involved in the transportation, this paper expounds the important significance of the research on the civil liability of the port of destination. By analyzing the characteristics of the contract of carriage of goods by sea and the legal relationship among the carrier, the shipper and the consignee, this paper studies the subject of the right of the port of destination where the goods are not picked up, and analyzes the carrier as the subject of the right. The actual carrier can not be the basis of the subject of the right; the liability subject of the port of destination is studied, the basis of the contracting shipper, the consignor and the consignee is analyzed, and the definition of "shipper" is pointed out. The limitations of "the consignee's obligation to take delivery of goods at the port of destination" and "the incongruity of the provisions of the Maritime Law" and the "Customs Law" are pointed out, and the improvement direction of the relevant articles of the "Maritime Law" is put forward. Finally, the paper holds that the port of destination is a liability for breach of contract, the carrier is entitled to the right to claim for loss, the contracting shipper, the shipper and the consignee may be the object of the carrier's right to exercise their rights; It is suggested that the principles of "documentary shipper", "consignee's obligation to take delivery with conditions" and "consistency between the provisions of the Maritime Law and the Customs Law" should be established by means of legislative or judicial interpretation. In order to solve the port of destination no delivery of the legal issue.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王晨;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中的貨物交付規(guī)則對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》的立法啟示[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2042700