本文選題：商標(biāo)權(quán) + 合理使用　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：許多國家《商標(biāo)法》對商標(biāo)權(quán)的限制均有相應(yīng)的規(guī)定。然而我國《商標(biāo)法》在歷經(jīng)兩次修改之后，至今尚未對商標(biāo)權(quán)規(guī)定合理的限制。這既與國際立法趨勢不符，也使得我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)立法體系顯得不夠協(xié)調(diào)。商標(biāo)權(quán)作為一種私權(quán)利，其實(shí)施將在一定程度上影響到社會公眾的利益，從平衡商標(biāo)權(quán)人與他社會公眾利益角度看，在商標(biāo)權(quán)人的利益與他人或社會公眾利益發(fā)生沖突時，不僅要考慮商標(biāo)權(quán)人的利益，也需要對他人合法權(quán)益給予必要的保護(hù)，完全沒有限制的商標(biāo)權(quán)顯然忽視了公眾的利益，是不合理的。借鑒國外立法，對我國商標(biāo)權(quán)限制加以規(guī)定、發(fā)展和完善是十分必要的。 本論文首先闡述了商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的理論基礎(chǔ)。從商標(biāo)權(quán)的確立、商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的概念和種類、商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的基本理論、商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的價值等方面對商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的理論進(jìn)行了全面的論證和研究。 商標(biāo)合理使用是商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的內(nèi)容之一。本論文認(rèn)為商標(biāo)權(quán)合理使用的方式包括商業(yè)性合理使用和非商業(yè)性合理使用兩種，其中，商業(yè)性的合理使用主要包括敘述性使用、指示性使用及合理評論性使用，非商業(yè)性合理使用主要包括新聞報道及新聞評論中的合理使用、滑稽模仿言論自由中的合理使用及字典中的合理使用；在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了判斷商標(biāo)合理使用的五大標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；并在分析了我國商標(biāo)合理使用現(xiàn)狀基礎(chǔ)上，提出在《商標(biāo)法》中確立商標(biāo)合理使用制度和在《商標(biāo)法實(shí)施細(xì)則》中明確商標(biāo)合理使用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的建議。 商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭是商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的內(nèi)容之二。本論文首先對商標(biāo)窮竭的適用條件進(jìn)行了分析、探討，商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭僅指銷售權(quán)、贈與權(quán)的窮竭，貿(mào)易自由是商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭的目的，首次銷售合法是商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭的前提。商標(biāo)窮竭的效力范圍有國內(nèi)窮竭、區(qū)域窮竭和國際窮竭，本論文認(rèn)為我國應(yīng)采取國際窮竭的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而又不否認(rèn)其例外。 商標(biāo)的在先使用權(quán)是商標(biāo)權(quán)限制的內(nèi)容之三。本論文首先對一些國家商標(biāo)的在先使用權(quán)進(jìn)行了比較分析，進(jìn)而確立商標(biāo)在先使用權(quán)的構(gòu)成條件和商標(biāo)在先使用權(quán)行使原則，，提出在《商標(biāo)法》中明確規(guī)定商標(biāo)在先使用權(quán)和在《商標(biāo)法實(shí)施細(xì)則》中明確規(guī)定在先使用權(quán)的具體內(nèi)容及在先權(quán)利受到侵犯時對在先權(quán)利主體進(jìn)行補(bǔ)救的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Many countries'Trademark Law has the corresponding stipulation to the trademark right restriction. However, after two amendments, the Trademark Law of our country has not yet stipulated reasonable restrictions on trademark rights. This not only does not accord with the international legislative trend, but also makes the intellectual property legislation system of our country appear uncoordinated. Trademark right as a private right, its implementation will affect the interests of the public to a certain extent. From the point of view of balancing the trademark owner and other social public interests, when the trademark owner's interests conflict with others or the public interests of the society, It is not only necessary to consider the interests of trademark owners, but also to protect the legitimate rights and interests of others. It is unreasonable that the completely unlimited trademark rights ignore the interests of the public. It is necessary to develop and perfect the limitation of trademark rights in our country by using foreign legislation for reference. Firstly, this paper expounds the theoretical basis of the limitation of trademark rights. From the establishment of trademark right, the concept and type of trademark right limitation, the basic theory of trademark right limitation, The theory of trademark right limitation is fully demonstrated and studied in the aspects of the value of trademark right restriction, and the rational use of trademark is one of the contents of trademark right restriction. This paper holds that the rational use of trademark rights includes commercial rational use and non-commercial rational use, in which the commercial rational use mainly includes narrative use, indicative use and rational critical use. Non-commercial rational use mainly includes reasonable use in news reports and news reviews, reasonable use in parody speech freedom and rational use in dictionaries, on the basis of which five criteria for judging the rational use of trademarks are put forward. And on the basis of analyzing the current situation of the rational use of trademarks in China, This paper puts forward the suggestion of establishing the system of fair use of trademark in Trademark Law and clarifying the standard of rational use of trademark in the detailed rules of Trademark Law. The exhaustion of trademark right is the second part of the limitation of trademark right. This paper first analyzes the applicable conditions of trademark exhaustion and discusses that the exhaustion of trademark right only refers to the exhaustion of the right of sale and the exhaustion of the right of gift. The purpose of exhaustion of trademark right is trade freedom, and the premise of exhaustion of trademark right is the exhaustion of trademark right for the first time. The scope of trademark exhaustion includes domestic exhaustion, regional exhaustion and international exhaustion. This paper holds that our country should adopt the standard of international exhaustion without denying its exception. The first use right of trademark is the third part of the limitation of trademark right. First of all, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the first use right of trademark in some countries, and then establishes the constitution condition of trademark first use right and the principle of trademark first use right. This paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on the clear stipulation of the first use right of trademark in Trademark Law and the specific content of prior right of use and the remedy of the subject of prior right when the prior right is infringed in the detailed rules for the implementation of Trademark Law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 宋紅松,劉君;商標(biāo)權(quán)的限制與漏洞補(bǔ)充[J];中華商標(biāo);2002年02期

2 黃瑩;對未注冊商標(biāo)保護(hù)的法律思考[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2004年03期

3 楊淑霞,李彬;論注冊商標(biāo)的合理使用[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

4 邱平榮,張大成;試論商標(biāo)法中在先權(quán)的保護(hù)與限制[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2002年03期

5 金多才;我國商標(biāo)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的進(jìn)步與不足[J];商丘師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

6 齊云峰;在先使用:論對商標(biāo)使用人權(quán)利的保護(hù)制度[J];云南財貿(mào)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

7 張永艾;商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭原則質(zhì)疑[J];政法論叢;2004年01期

8 李虹;論注冊商標(biāo)商業(yè)性的合理使用[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 苗自富;論商標(biāo)權(quán)的限制[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

本文編號：2009106