本文選題：銀行的法律地位 + 商事關(guān)系��； 參考：《法制博覽》2015年24期

【摘要】：隨著轟動(dòng)一時(shí)的"許霆案"判決結(jié)果的出現(xiàn),公眾對(duì)此案的關(guān)注和評(píng)論也漸漸平息,但此案卻產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。許霆案由廣州市中級(jí)法院二審,以盜竊罪判處許霆5年有期徒刑,罰金2萬元,并退賠173826元給受害單位。針對(duì)該案的結(jié)果引發(fā)了學(xué)界的討論,大多是從刑法角度來探討的,本文試通過商法的角度對(duì)該案加以分析。
[Abstract]:With the emergence of the sensational "Xu Ting case" judgment, the public attention and comments on the case gradually subsided, but the case has had a profound impact. Xu Ting case by the Guangzhou Intermediate Court of second instance, with theft sentenced to 5 years in prison, a fine of 20, 000 yuan, and 173826 yuan to the injured unit. The result of this case has aroused the academic discussion, mostly from the angle of criminal law, this article tries to analyze the case through the angle of commercial law.
【作者單位】： 河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D923.99

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣大興;;商事關(guān)系法律調(diào)整之研究——類型化路徑與法體系分工[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2005年03期

2 朱和鴿;論商事信用[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

3 孫s，

本文編號(hào)：2000789