本文選題：商業(yè)秘密 + 民事侵權(quán)��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 當今，世界上許多國家的法律對于商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)及其民事司法救濟制度均作了規(guī)定，中外學者在此問題上也進行了深入研究，且成果頗豐。然而，學界及實務界對于如何加強理論研究與司法實踐的結(jié)合問題涉及者不是很多，且認識不一。我國學界對于商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)及其民事司法救濟制度的研究起步較晚，現(xiàn)行法律對這一制度的規(guī)定還不夠完善，不能適應復雜多變的經(jīng)濟生活的需要。因此，進一步深入研究這一制度，特別是加強理論研究與司法實踐之間的有機結(jié)合就顯得十分必要。 本文從商業(yè)秘密法保護公平競爭、維護商業(yè)秘密權(quán)利人合法權(quán)益的根本宗旨出發(fā)，結(jié)合我國商業(yè)秘密保護的司法實踐，緊扣商業(yè)秘密及商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)行為的本質(zhì)進行探討，，對商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)民事司法救濟制度的幾個主要問題進行了系統(tǒng)闡述，以期實現(xiàn)對我國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)民事司法救濟理論研究的豐富與深化，并對我國商業(yè)秘密保護的司法實踐有所裨益。 本文旨在通過對商業(yè)秘密法律保護理論的歷史沿革與發(fā)展、商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)行為與一般侵權(quán)行為構(gòu)成之不同要求、商業(yè)秘密保護的中外立法與司法實踐等方面進行考察分析，澄清在商業(yè)秘密及商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)行為的構(gòu)成、商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)民事司法救濟等方面存在的認識誤區(qū)，尋求適當?shù)慕鉀Q方案，以實現(xiàn)理論研究與司法實踐的有機結(jié)合。 鑒于我國現(xiàn)行法律對于商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)民事司法救濟制度規(guī)定得不很規(guī)范和具體，有些規(guī)定還與WTO有關(guān)規(guī)則相沖突，因此，有 WP=19 必要進一步完善之。本文提出應在堅持商業(yè)秘密法根本宗旨，適當借鑒國外有益的理論成果和立法經(jīng)驗的前提下，結(jié)合我國國情，通過立法將商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)行為的本質(zhì)、類型、確認原則、損害賠償及其歸責原則等方面的規(guī)定有機地統(tǒng)一起來，從而構(gòu)建科學的、符合當今經(jīng)濟生活需要的商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)民事司法救濟制度。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the laws of many countries in the world provide for the infringement of trade secrets and the system of civil judicial relief. Chinese and foreign scholars have also made a thorough study on this issue, and the results have been quite fruitful. However, there are not many scholars and practitioners involved in how to strengthen the combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. The research on the infringement of trade secrets and its civil judicial relief system in Chinese academic circles started late, and the current law on this system is not perfect enough to adapt to the needs of complex and changeable economic life. Therefore, it is necessary to further study this system, especially to strengthen the organic combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. Starting from the fundamental purpose of protecting fair competition and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders of trade secrets, this paper discusses the essence of trade secrets and their infringing acts in accordance with the judicial practice of the protection of trade secrets in our country. In order to enrich and deepen the theoretical research on the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement in China, this paper systematically expounds several main problems of the civil judicial remedy system of trade secret infringement, in order to realize the enrichment and deepening of the theoretical research on the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement. It is beneficial to the judicial practice of trade secret protection in our country. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and analyze the historical evolution and development of the theory of legal protection of trade secrets, the different requirements of the constitution of the tort of trade secret and the general tort, and the legislation and judicial practice of the protection of trade secret in China and abroad, and so on. This paper clarifies the misunderstanding existing in the aspects of trade secret and the constitution of trade secret infringement, the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement, and seeks appropriate solutions to realize the organic combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. In view of the fact that the current law of our country does not regulate and specify the civil judicial relief system for the infringement of trade secrets, some of the provisions conflict with the relevant rules of WTO, therefore, there are WP=19 It is necessary to further improve it. This paper puts forward that under the premise of adhering to the fundamental purpose of the trade secret law, drawing on the beneficial theoretical achievements and legislative experience of foreign countries appropriately, combining with the national conditions of our country, the essence, types and principles of the infringement of trade secret should be confirmed by legislation. The rules of compensation for damages and their imputation principles are organically unified, so as to construct a scientific judicial relief system for infringement of trade secrets in accordance with the needs of today's economic life.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D913

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 郝建偉;商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)法律救濟制度研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2009年

2 李燕平;商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償研究[D];北京化工大學;2013年

本文編號：1923887