本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)法 + 法律運(yùn)行　； 參考：《云南民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)法是實(shí)質(zhì)理性法或稱回應(yīng)型法,而不是自治法或形式理性法,它的運(yùn)行與民商法、行政法等傳統(tǒng)法律的運(yùn)行有很大區(qū)別。經(jīng)濟(jì)法的運(yùn)行模式是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)形式化法律運(yùn)行模式的突破或背叛。經(jīng)濟(jì)法的不可避免的實(shí)質(zhì)化運(yùn)行趨勢(shì)肯定會(huì)導(dǎo)致法律理論上的沖突和運(yùn)行中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),比如關(guān)于法律運(yùn)行的封閉與開(kāi)放、法律適用的普遍與個(gè)別、法治的確定與變化、法律實(shí)施的強(qiáng)制與自覺(jué)、國(guó)家干預(yù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的正當(dāng)性與規(guī)范性。為了解決上述問(wèn)題,筆者試圖通過(guò)完善正當(dāng)程序機(jī)制的方式,有效地理順經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論上的沖突和化解運(yùn)行中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),彌補(bǔ)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的形式性的不足,從而使回應(yīng)性的國(guó)家干預(yù)能夠運(yùn)行于法治的軌道。 筆者首先研究了法律運(yùn)行的理論和實(shí)踐方面的原理,總結(jié)評(píng)價(jià)了法律運(yùn)行方面的研究成果,為下文的論述做好準(zhǔn)備。依據(jù)韋伯的法律理想模式理論,筆者論述了法律形式化的發(fā)展歷程,分析了傳統(tǒng)法律為什么會(huì)走上形式化的發(fā)展道路和現(xiàn)代法律反形式化的原因。為了論述經(jīng)濟(jì)法實(shí)質(zhì)化的具體特征,筆者對(duì)比研究了法律規(guī)則和法律標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、法律實(shí)務(wù)的壟斷和開(kāi)放、法律推理的形式化和實(shí)質(zhì)化、法律理論的純粹性和復(fù)合性。在充分認(rèn)識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的實(shí)質(zhì)化趨勢(shì)之后,接著分析經(jīng)濟(jì)法運(yùn)行的困惑和沖突,而正當(dāng)?shù)某绦驒C(jī)制正是化解這些矛盾的有效途徑。經(jīng)濟(jì)法程序的主要機(jī)制是對(duì)話、談判、妥協(xié)和自治,它是以平等對(duì)話和民主協(xié)商為基礎(chǔ)的公共選擇機(jī)制,以公正、公開(kāi)和條件優(yōu)勢(shì)為基本原則。一切法律問(wèn)題的最終解決方案都是制度化或規(guī)范化,經(jīng)濟(jì)法的程序機(jī)制最終落實(shí)到具體的主體制度、信息與資訊制度、對(duì)話與聽(tīng)證制度、決定制度之中。針對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的問(wèn)題,筆者提出了一些嘗試性的建議。 本論文的基本結(jié)論:正當(dāng)程序機(jī)制作為法律的“元規(guī)則”,對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)法的實(shí)質(zhì)化運(yùn)行具有重要意義。本論文創(chuàng)新性的側(cè)重論述:正當(dāng)程序機(jī)制是實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)法實(shí)質(zhì)化運(yùn)行與傳統(tǒng)形式化法治相統(tǒng)一的有效路徑。
[Abstract]:Economic law is the substantive rational law or response law, but not the autonomy law or formal rational law. Its operation is very different from the operation of the traditional law, such as civil and commercial law, administrative law and so on.The operation mode of economic law is a breakthrough or betrayal of the traditional formalized law operation mode.The inevitable trend of substantive operation of economic law will inevitably lead to conflicts in legal theory and risks in operation, such as the closure and opening of legal operation, the universal and individual application of law, and the determination and change of the rule of law.The compulsion and consciousness of law enforcement, the legitimacy and standardization of state intervention in economy.In order to solve the above problems, the author tries to improve the mechanism of due process, effectively straighten out the theoretical conflicts of economic law and resolve the risks in operation, and make up for the lack of formality of economic law.So that responsive state intervention can run on the track of the rule of law.Firstly, the author studies the theory and practice of legal operation, summarizes and evaluates the research results of legal operation, and prepares for the following discussion.According to Weber's theory of ideal mode of law, the author discusses the development course of formalization of law, and analyzes the reasons why traditional law has taken the path of formalization and the reason of anti-formalization of modern law.In order to discuss the specific characteristics of the essence of economic law, the author contrasts the legal rules and legal standards, the monopoly and openness of legal practice, the formalization and materialization of legal reasoning, the purity and compounding of legal theory.After fully understanding the substantive trend of economic law, the author then analyzes the confusion and conflict in the operation of economic law, and the proper procedural mechanism is the effective way to resolve these contradictions.The main mechanism of economic law procedure is dialogue, negotiation, compromise and autonomy. It is a public choice mechanism based on equal dialogue and democratic consultation.The final solution to all legal problems is institutionalization or standardization, and the procedural mechanism of economic law is finally implemented in the specific subject system, information and information system, dialogue and hearing system, and decision system.In view of the practical problems, the author puts forward some tentative suggestions.The basic conclusion of this paper is that due process mechanism, as the "meta-rule" of law, is of great significance to the substantive operation of economic law.This paper focuses on the innovative discussion: due process mechanism is an effective way to realize the unity of the essence of economic law and the traditional formalization of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D912.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

2 陳小文;程序正義的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];比較法研究;2003年01期

3 呂忠梅,鄢斌;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的程序理性[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

4 陳彩虹;;亞當(dāng)·斯密與凱恩斯之爭(zhēng)又起[J];讀書;2009年04期

5 劉普生;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的回應(yīng)性[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年02期

6 孫濤;;關(guān)于法國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的概念和學(xué)說(shuō)[J];法學(xué)家;1999年04期

7 邱本,梁代軍;經(jīng)濟(jì)法實(shí)施研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年03期

8 李昌麒,岳彩申,葉明;論民法、行政法、經(jīng)濟(jì)法的互動(dòng)機(jī)制[J];法學(xué);2001年05期

9 左劍君;我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2005年01期

10 錢弘道;法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1737478