本文選題：司法　切入點(diǎn)：仲裁　出處：《上海交通大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 司法與仲裁制度作為我國民商法體系中的重要組成部分,在和諧社會(huì)主義建設(shè)中起到了化解市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)主體在經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中發(fā)生的利益沖突,保護(hù)當(dāng)事人合法的民事權(quán)益,維護(hù)社會(huì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序和生活秩序,保障市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展等積極作用。理論與實(shí)踐,無論從哪個(gè)層面出發(fā),司法與仲裁二者之間都存在著深刻的淵源。體現(xiàn)在仲裁的立法中,就表現(xiàn)為司法對(duì)仲裁的支持與協(xié)助,以及司法對(duì)仲裁的審查與控制。在形式上,司法對(duì)仲裁的參與制式既有支持,也有限制。司法對(duì)仲裁的支持使得仲裁的進(jìn)行有了國家強(qiáng)制力的維護(hù);同時(shí),司法對(duì)仲裁的限制又給予了仲裁公正性的保障。本文通過深入審視與分析司法與仲裁之間的關(guān)系,力爭在理念上形成更為深刻的認(rèn)識(shí),以求能夠更好地平衡二者的地位。這在實(shí)現(xiàn)公正與效率并重的價(jià)值標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、實(shí)現(xiàn)司法介入但無干預(yù)的基本原則等方面具有一定的理論意義。在尋求最大限度發(fā)揮仲裁優(yōu)勢(shì)與作用的模式同時(shí),又不削弱司法應(yīng)有的權(quán)威,使仲裁與司法形成相輔相成、又互相牽制,在一定范圍內(nèi)開展競爭的態(tài)勢(shì)。在實(shí)踐中,司法和仲裁良性關(guān)系的形成及貫徹狀況更是對(duì)國家經(jīng)濟(jì)和法制環(huán)境有著至關(guān)重要的影響力,完善而開放的司法與仲裁的關(guān)系體系可以讓我國在國際經(jīng)濟(jì)競爭中取得優(yōu)勢(shì)地位,增強(qiáng)我國對(duì)外國貿(mào)易伙伴和投資者的吸引力。 首先,本文對(duì)司法與仲裁的關(guān)系進(jìn)行探源。從理論層面的高度對(duì)司法與仲裁進(jìn)行概述,闡明其概念、性質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)、歷史發(fā)展以及相互存在的千絲萬縷的聯(lián)系。 其次,在對(duì)司法與仲裁兩組問題明析的基礎(chǔ)上,延續(xù)歷史的脈絡(luò),進(jìn)一步深入闡釋當(dāng)代法制社會(huì)中,司法與仲裁真正形成的關(guān)系:支持與監(jiān)督。同時(shí)從支持與監(jiān)督兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行剖析,力爭全面解讀二者的聯(lián)系。 然后,綜合借鑒當(dāng)代國際社會(huì)中有代表性的國家的仲裁制度,對(duì)司法與仲裁關(guān)系的相互作用進(jìn)行世界范圍內(nèi)的比較和借鑒。 最后,落實(shí)在當(dāng)代我國法制建設(shè)的社會(huì)進(jìn)程中,對(duì)我國法律系統(tǒng)中的司法與仲裁關(guān)系的積極以及消極方面進(jìn)行思考和分析,對(duì)我國司法與仲裁關(guān)系的完善提出一點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the civil and commercial law system of our country, the judicial and arbitration system has played an important role in resolving the conflicts of interest in the economic activities of the main body of the market economy and protecting the legitimate civil rights and interests of the parties in the construction of harmonious socialism.Maintain social economic order and life order, ensure the healthy development of market economy and other positive roles.Theory and practice, no matter from which level, there is a profound origin between judicature and arbitration.In the legislation of arbitration, the judicial support and assistance to arbitration, as well as the judicial review and control of arbitration.In form, the judicial system of participation in arbitration has both support and limitations.The support of the judicature to the arbitration makes the arbitration have the national compulsory force, at the same time, the restriction of the judicature to the arbitration gives the guarantee of the arbitration fairness.By examining and analyzing the relationship between judicature and arbitration in depth, this paper tries to form a deeper understanding on the idea, in order to balance the status of the two better.It has certain theoretical significance in realizing the value standard of justice and efficiency, and realizing the basic principle of judicial intervention but no intervention.At the same time, it does not weaken the authority of the judicature, make arbitration and judicature complement each other, restrain each other, and develop the situation of competition in a certain range.In practice, the formation and implementation of the benign relationship between judicature and arbitration has a vital influence on the national economic and legal environment.The perfect and open relationship system between judicature and arbitration can make our country gain advantages in the international economic competition and enhance our attraction to foreign trading partners and investors.First of all, this paper explores the relationship between judicature and arbitration.From the perspective of theory, this paper summarizes the concept, nature, characteristics, historical development and interrelationship between judicature and arbitration.Secondly, on the basis of analyzing the two groups of problems of judicature and arbitration, this paper continues the historical context, and further explains the real relationship between judicature and arbitration in the contemporary society of legal system: support and supervision.At the same time, from the support and supervision of the two aspects of analysis, strive to fully understand the relationship between the two.Then, draw lessons from the arbitration system of representative countries in the contemporary international society, compare and draw lessons from the interaction between judicature and arbitration in the world.Finally, in the social process of the construction of legal system in contemporary China, the author thinks and analyzes the positive and negative aspects of the relationship between judicature and arbitration in the legal system of our country, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the relationship between judicature and arbitration in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D925.7;D926

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 樊昌坡;國際民商事仲裁中國家豁免權(quán)問題探析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

2 劉妍婧;關(guān)于我國仲裁趨向訴訟模式的法理思考[D];中共中央黨校;2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1707929